Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T07:07:49.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emergicenters and the Need for a Competitive Regulatory Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Joel L. Michaels  and
Mary Jean Crouter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Third party payment for health services in the United States has created an environment which offers little incentive to health care providers to be efficient. In response, health care policymakers have suggested that increased competition in the health care sector would encourage good managerial practices and improved cost efficiency. In recent years, health care providers that have the ability to provide services in a more cost-efficient manner have emerged; some, including health maintenance organizations and ambulatory surgical centers, have been encouraged by regulatory policy. In addition, a new alternative for the provision of emergency medical services has developed and has generated substantial controversy among physicians, hospitals, government officials, and the public. The entities that comprise this alternative are often collectively referred to as freestanding emergency care centers or “emergicenters.”

Much of the controversy surrounding emergicenters is caused by the lack of a definition which can be applied to the various emergicenter structures and operations.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 108 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rhode Island Department of Health, Rules and Regulations for the Licensing of Freestanding Emergency Care Facilities, R23-17-FECF §1.1 (December 30, 1981) [hereinafter cited as Rhode Island Rules and Regulations].Google Scholar
Id. at §1.2.Google Scholar
Preamble and Principles of the National Association of Freestanding Emergency Centers (formerly known as the National Association of Centers for Urgent Treatment).Google Scholar
N.Y. Pub. Health Law §2801(1) (McKinney 1981).Google Scholar
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 111, §52 (Michie/Law Coop 1982) (§51 requires licensure of clinics; §52 defines what clinic is and is not).Google Scholar
Rhode Island Rules and Regulations, supra note 1, at §2.2.Google Scholar
Rhode Island Department of Health, Rules and Regulations for the Licensing of Freestanding Emergency Care Facilities, R23-17-FECF (October 28, 1981).Google Scholar
For example, the Maryland Prince George's County Medical Society recently adopted a resolution which would require regulation of emergicenters if they use such terms as “emergency,” “urgent,” or other words which connote immediate care capability for sudden or unexpected conditions that might potentially require life-saving measures. In addition, such facilities would be required to fulfill a defined role in the local emergency medical system.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§300k et seq. (1976 and Supp. III 1979).Google Scholar
45 Fed. Reg. 69,475 (1980) (to be codified at 42 C.F.R. §123.401).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Special Report: Survey of State CON Law, Health Planning Law Reporter 5(2&3): 1-7 (1982).Google Scholar
Burns, L. Ferber, M., Freestanding Emergency Care Centers Create Public Policy Issues, Hospitals 55(10): 75 (May 16, 1981).Google ScholarPubMed
National Association of Freestanding Emergency Centers, Emergence (January 1982) at 3.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §§1395 et seq.Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §1395(d).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §1395(k).Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §1395(x)(u)Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §1395(f)(b)Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. §1395(l)(a)Google Scholar
Wilmington Gen. Hosp. v. Manlove, 174 A.2d 135 (Del. 1961).Google Scholar
Garcia v. Memorial Hospital, 557 S.W.2d 859 (Tx. Civ. App. 1977).Google Scholar
Hunt v. Palm Springs Gen. Hosp., Inc., 352 So.2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).Google Scholar
Massachusetts Chapter of American College of Physicians, Position Paper on Free Standing Care Facilities, at 2.Google Scholar
Methodist Hosp. v. Ball, 362 S.W.2d 475 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1961).Google Scholar
New Biloxi Hosp., Inc. v. Frazier, 146 So.2d 882 (Miss. 1962).Google Scholar
Nance v. James Archer Smith Hosp., Inc., 329 So.2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).Google Scholar
Rhode Island Rules and Regulations, supra note 1, at §2.2.Google Scholar
Id. at §7.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §9.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §10.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §11.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §16.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §21.0.Google Scholar
Id. at §19.0.Google Scholar
47 Fed. Reg. 12,574 (1982), corrected at 47 Fed. Reg. 13,174 (1982).Google Scholar