Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T00:48:04.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Will to Change: Lessons from Canada's Successful Decarceration of Youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Cheryl Marie Webster ,
Jane B. Sprott  and
Anthony N. Doob
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1997, Canada's youth custodial facilities held 3825 sentenced youths. Eighteen years later, this number was 527—an 86 percent reduction. Overall youth imprisonment (sentenced + pretrial detention) decreased by approximately 73 percent. This paper uses Canada's successful decarceration of youths to understand what might be learned about decarceration more broadly. By examining the reforms that transpired in Canada's treatment of young offenders since the 1960s and the political/cultural shifts that occurred since the 1990s, we demonstrate that the decline resulted from changes occurring in various parts of the system. Finally, we contrast this decarceration with more than 60 years of relative stability of Canadian adult imprisonment rates as well as Canada's failure to substantially decrease youth pretrial detention in order to identify those factors seemingly necessary to reduce imprisonment more generally.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 1092 - 1131
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This work was supported by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the first two authors.

References

Bala, Nicholas (2015) Changing Professional Culture and Reducing Use of Courts and Custody for Youth. 78 Saskatchewan Law Rev. 127–180.Google Scholar
Bala, Nicholas & Anand, Sanjeev (2012) Youth Criminal Justice Law, 3rd ed. Toronto: Irwin.Google Scholar
Bala, Nicholas, Carrington, Peter J., & Roberts, Julian V. (2009) “Evaluating the Youth Criminal Justice Act after Five Years—A Qualified Success,” 51 Canadian J. of Criminology and Criminal Justice 131–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhorst, Richard (2012) “Youth Justice Policy Reform,” in Ismaili, K., et al., eds., Canadian Criminal Justice Policy. Toronto: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bateman, Tim (2014) “Where Has all the Youth Crime Gone? Youth Justice in an Age of Austerity,” 28 Children and Society 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, Tim (2017) “The State of Youth Justice, 2017”. Available at: http://uobrep.openrepository.com/uobrep/handle/10547/622241Google Scholar
Campbell, M. (2014) “The Emergence of Penal Extremism in California,” 48 Law & Society Rev. 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canada (1998) A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice. Ottawa: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987) Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Committee on Juvenile Delinquency (1965) Report: Juvenile Delinquency in Canada. Ottawa: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Doob, A. N. & Sprott, J. B. (1998) “Is the ‘Quality’ of Youth Violence Becoming More Serious?” 40 Canadian J. of Criminology 185–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, A. N. & Sprott, J. B. (2004) “Changing Models of Youth Justice in Canada,” 31 Crime and Justice 185–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, A. N. & Sprott, J. B. (2006) “Punishing Youth Crime in Canada: The Blind Men and the Elephant,” 8 Punishment and Society 223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, A. N. & Webster, C. M. (2006) “Countering Punitiveness: Understanding Stability in Canada's Imprisonment Rate,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 325–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, A. N. & Webster, C. M. (2016) “Weathering the Storm? Testing Longstanding Canadian Sentencing Policy in the 21st Century,” 45 Crime and Justice 359–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, Anthony, et al. (1998) An Exploration of Ontario Residents' Views of Crime and the Criminal Justice System. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony N. and Cheryl, Marie Webster (2013). “The ‘Truth in Sentencing’ Act: The Triumph of Form over Substance” 17 Canadian Criminal Law Review 365–392.Google Scholar
Downes, David & van Swaaningen, René (2007) “The Road to Dystopia? Changes in the Penal Climate of The Netherlands,” 35 Crime and Justice 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (1996) Corrections Population Growth. Government of Canada: Ottawa.Google Scholar
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice (1996) A Review of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada. Canada: Ottawa.Google Scholar
Gartner, Rosemary, Doob, Anthony N., & Zimring, Franklin E. (2011) “The Past as Prologue? Decarceration in California Then and Now,” 10 Criminology and Public Policy 287–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansard (House of Commons Debates) 35th Parliament, 1st Session Volume 4. Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2000) “The Fall in the Finnish Prison Population,” 1 J. of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2007) “Penal Policy in Scandinavia,” 36 Crime & Justice 217–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2012) “Penal Policies in the Nordic Countries 1960–2010,” 13 J. of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour (1989) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Toronto: Canadian-American Committee, C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Minister of Justice (1998). A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice. May 1998.Google Scholar
OJJDP (2018). Juveniles in Residential Placement 2015, Available at: https://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/250951.pdf (accessed February 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Ruth, Henry & Reitz, Kevin (2003) The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking our Response. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scotland (2017). Progress Report on Implementation of the Youth Justice Strategy. Available at: https://beta.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/report/2017/06/youth-justice-strategy-preventing-offending-getting-right-children-young-people/documents/00521348-pdf/00521348-pdf/govscot:document/ (accessed February 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Solicitor General Canada (1975) Young Persons in Conflict with the Law. Ottawa: Solicitor General.Google Scholar
Solicitor General Canada (1977) Highlights of the Proposed New Legislation for Young Offenders. Ottawa: Solicitor General.Google Scholar
Solicitor General Canada (1979) Legislative Proposals to Replace the Young Offenders Act. Ottawa: Solicitor General.Google Scholar
Sprott, J. B. (1996) “Understanding Public Views of Youth Crime and the Youth Justice System,” 38 Canadian J. of Criminology 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs (1997) Reviewing Youth Justice. 35th Parliament, 2nd Session. Committee Report #13.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Justice and the Solicitor General (1993) Crime Prevention in Canada: Toward a National Strategy. 34th Parliament, 3rd Session. Committee Report #12.Google Scholar
Taylor, Melanie (2017) “USA,” in Decker, S. H. & Marteache, N., eds., International Handbook of Juvenile Justice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2004) Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2011). “Making Peace, Not a Desert. Penal Reform Should Be About Values Not Justice Reinvestment” 10 Criminology and Public Policy 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2013) ““Nothing” Works: Sentencing “Reform” in Canada and the United States,” 55 Canadian J. of Criminology and Criminal Justice 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2014) “Remodeling American Sentencing: A Ten-Step Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration,” 13 Criminology and Public Policy 503–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2017) “Making American Sentencing Just, Humane, and Effective,” 46 Crime & Justice 441–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trépanier, Jean (2004) “What Did Quebec Not Want? Opposition to the Adoption of the Youth Criminal Justice Act in Quebec,” 46 Canadian J. of Criminology & Criminal Justice 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. M. (2015) “Broken Bail” in Canada: How we Might Go about Fixing it. Ottawa: Department of Justice, Canada.Google Scholar
Webster, C. M. & Doob, A. N. (2007) “Punitive Trends and Stable Imprisonment Rates in Canada,” 36 Crime & Justice 297–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. M. & Doob, A. N. (2014) “Penal Reform ‘Canadian Style’: Fiscal Responsibility and Decarceration in Alberta, Canada,” 16 Punishment & Society 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. M. & Doob, A. N. (2015) “American Punitiveness ‘Canadian Style’?: Cultural Values and Canadian Punishment Policy,” 17 Punishment & Society 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, C. M. & Doob, A. N. (2018) “Penal Optimism: Understanding American Mass Imprisonment from a Canadian Perspective,” in Reitz, K., ed., American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin (2002) “The Common Thread: Diversion in the Jurisprudence of Juvenile Courts,” in Rosenheim, M. K., et al., eds., A Century of Juvenile Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin (2005) American Juvenile Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar