Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T16:32:14.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Study PACs?

Review products

Matasar Ann B.. Corporate PACs and Federal Campaign Financing Laws. (Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 1986). x + 161 pp. Tables, notes, appendices, bibliography, index. $35.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Stephen E. Gottlieb
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , 1988 , pp. 907 - 909
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by The Law and Society Association

References

References

ADAMANY, David, and George, AGREE (1975) Political Money. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
ALEXANDER, Herbert (1980) Financing Politics: Money, Elections and Political Reform. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
CEASER, James (1979) Presidential Selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOTTLIEB, Stephen E. (1985) “Fleshing Out the Right of Association: The Problem of Contribution Limits of the Federal Election Campaign Act,” 49 Albany Law Review 825.Google Scholar
JACOBSON, Gary (1980) Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
LOWENSTEIN, Daniel (1985) “Political Bribery and the Intermediate Theory of Politics,” 32 UCLA Law Review 784.Google Scholar
NOONAN, John (1984) Bribes. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
WERTHEIMER, Fred, and Randy, HUWA (1980-81) “Campaign Finance Reforms: Past Accomplishments, Future Challenges,” 10 NYU Review of Law and Social Change 43.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Sun Oil Company, Federal Election Commission Advisory Opinion, 1975-23.Google Scholar