Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T03:55:40.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's So Special about Specialized Courts? The State and Social Change in Salt Lake City's Domestic Violence Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rekha Mirchandani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nationwide growth in specialized or problem-solving courts, including drug courts, community courts, mental health courts, and domestic violence courts, among others, raises questions about the role of the state with respect to social change. According to social control theories of the state, especially theories of technocratic or rationalized justice, law is increasingly about efficiency, speed, and effectiveness. Specialized courts, however, take on a social problem approach to crime, seeking to address crime's “root causes” within the individual, the society, and the larger culture in ways more characteristic of social movements. Are specialized courts about social control or social change? This study examines state action in a specialized court in domestic violence in order to examine this question. I focus on a domestic violence court that arose in February 1997 and four years later employed full-time judges, prosecuting and defense attorneys, and numerous other staff to handle all misdemeanor domestic violence cases in Salt Lake County, Utah. I ask how legal, political, and community officials justify the court and its operation in order to examine some important issues about the role of the state and social change. Ultimately, I suggest that my findings about the complementary roles of social control and social change within domestic violence courts have implications not only for critical theories of technocratic justice and for the battered women's movement but also for democratic theories of the state.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 379 - 417
Copyright
© 2005 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

American Bar Association (1994) Available at http://www.abanet.org/ftp/pub/yld/2001assemagenda/117.pdf (accessed July 28, 2002).Google Scholar
Beasley, Michele E., & Thomas, Dorothy Q. (1994) “Domestic Violence as a Human Rights Issue,” in Fineman, M. A. & Mykitiuk, R., eds., The Public Nature of Private Violence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Berman, Greg ed. (2000) “What Is a Traditional Judge Anyway?,” 84 Judicature 78.Google Scholar
Berman, Greg, & Feinblatt, John (2001) “Problem-Solving Courts: A Brief Primer,” 23 Law & Policy 125.Google Scholar
Boldt, Richard C. (2002) “The Adversary System and Attorney Role in the Drug Court Movement,” in Nolan, J. L., ed., Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Butts, Jeffrey A. (2001) “Introduction: Problem-Solving Courts,” 23 Law & Policy 121.Google Scholar
Center for Court Innovation (2003). Available at http://www.problem-solvingcourts.org (accessed July 28, 2002).Google Scholar
Church, Thomas (1982) Examining Local Legal Culture: Practitioner Attitudes in Four Criminal Courts. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Clear, Todd R., & Karp, David R. (1999) The Community Justice Ideal: Preventing Crime and Achieving Justice. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Conference of Chief Justices (2000). Available at http://cosca.ncsc.dni.us/Resolutions/resolutionproblemsolvingcts.html (accessed July 28, 2002).Google Scholar
Conference of State Court Administrators (2000). Available at http://cosca.ncsc.dni.us/Resolutions/resolutionproblemsolvingcts.html (accessed July 28, 2002).Google Scholar
Copelon, Rhonda (1994) “Recognizing the Egregious in the Everyday: Domestic Violence as Torture,” 25 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 291, 295.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. Emerson, & Dobash, Russell P. (1979) Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. Emerson, & Dobash, Russell P. (1992) Women, Violence and Social Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dzur, Albert W. (2004) “Democratic Professionalism: Sharing Authority in Civic Life,” 12 The Good Society 18–31.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, James, et al. (1988) The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1985) “Politics and the Battered Woman,” 32 Dissent 55–61.Google Scholar
Epstein, Deborah (1999) “Effective Intervention in Domestic Violence Cases: Rethinking the Roles of Prosecutors, Judges and the Court System,” 11 Yale J. of Law and Feminism 3.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm (1979) The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. (1983) “The Bureaucratization of the Judiciary,” 92 Yale Law J. 1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. (1984) “Against Settlement,” 93 Yale Law J. 1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaddis, Patricia (2001) “In the Beginning … A Creation Story of Battered Women's Shelters,” Off Our Backs, pp. 14–5.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (2004) “The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts,” 1 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 459–570.Google Scholar
Goldkamp, John S. (1994) Justice and Treatment Innovation: The Drug Court Movement. A Working Paper of the First National Drug Court Conference, December 1993.” National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Goldkamp, John S. (2002) “Problem-Solving Courts: From Adversarial Litigation to Innovative Jurisprudence: Eleventh Annual Symposium on Contemporary Urban Challenges: Thursday, February 28, 2002: Afternoon Session: The Changing Face of Justice: Alternative Approaches to Problem-Solving,” 29 Fordham Urban Law J. 2000. pmid/12233898Google Scholar
Goldkamp, John S., & Irons-Guynn, Cheryl (2000) Emerging Judicial Strategies for the Mentally Ill in the Criminal Caseload: Mental Health Courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Assistance.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda (1988) “‘The Powers of the Weak’: Wife-Beating and Battered Women's Resistance,” in Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1975) Legitimation Crisis, Trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1994) “Three Normative Models of Democracy,” 1 Constellations 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1996a) “Paradigms of Law,” 17 Cardozo Law Rev. 771.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1996b) Between Facts and Norms. Trans. William Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1998) “On the Relation between the Nation, the Rule of Law, and Democracy,” in Cronin, C. & De Greif, P., eds., The Inclusion of The Other. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (2001) “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?,” 29 Political Theory 766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Lynne (1996) “Homeboys, Babies, Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance,” 61 American Sociological Rev. 759–78. pmid/9246501Google Scholar
Haney, Lynne (2000) “Feminist State Theory: Applications to Jurisprudence, Criminology and the Welfare State,” 26 Annual Rev. of Sociology 641–66.Google Scholar
Hanna, Cheryl (1996) “No Right to Choose: Mandated Victim Participation in Domestic Violence Prosecutions,” 109 Harvard Law Rev. 1849–62.Google Scholar
Hanna, Cheryl (1998) “The Paradox of Hope: The Crime and Punishment of Domestic Violence,” 39 William & Mary Law Rev. 1505.Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Wolf, & Seron, Carroll (1990) Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of Federal District Courts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. (2000) “The Drug Court Scandal,” 78 North Carolina Law Rev. 1437–1534.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Morris B. (2002) “The Denver Drug Court and Its Unintended Consequences,” in Nolan, J. L., ed., Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holland, Paul, & Mlyniec, Wallace J. (1995) “Whatever Happened to the Right to Treatment? The Modern Quest for a Historical Promise,” 68 Temple Law Rev. 1791.Google Scholar
Horiuchi, Vince (1998) “Fighting Over Stupid Things Lead Cause of ‘97 Murders; Drugs Drop to No. 2 Factor; Domestic Violence Falls to 3,” Salt Lake Tribune, 3 Jan., B-1.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max [1947](1972) Eclipse of Reason. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, & Adorno, Theodor W. [1944](1987) Dialectic of Enlightenment, Trans. John Cumming. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Karan, Amy, et al. (1999) “Domestic Violence Courts: What Are They and How Should We Manage Them? 50 Juvenile & Family Court J. 75.Google Scholar
Kaye, Judith S. (2002) “Problem-Solving Courts: From Adversarial Litigation to Innovative Jurisprudence: Eleventh Annual Symposium on Contemporary Urban Challenges: Thursday, February 28, 2002: Afternoon Session: The Changing Face of Justice: Keynote Address,” 29 Fordham Urban Law J. 1925. pmid/12465391Google Scholar
Kaye, Judith S. (2004) “Delivering Justice Today: A Problem-Solving Approach,” 22 Yale Law and Policy Rev. 125.Google Scholar
Keilitz, Susan (2000) Specialized Domestic Violence Case Management: A National Survey. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Kelly, Kristin A. (2003) Domestic Violence and the Politics of Privacy. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Catherine F, & Orloff, Leslye E. (1993) “Providing Legal Protection for Battered Women: An Analysis of State Statutes and Case Law,” 21 Hofstra Law Rev. 801.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert (1979) “Political Culture, Trial Courts and Criminal Cases,” in Nardulli, P., ed., The Study of Criminal Courts: Political Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Lee, Eric (2000) Community Courts: An Evolving Model. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Assistance.Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allen, & Tyler, Tom R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littel, Kristen (2003) Specialized Courts and Domestic Violence,” Issues of Democracy Available at http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0502/ijde/little.html (accessed July 15, 2003).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Isabel (1994) “Reframing Domestic Violence: Terrorism in the Home,” in Fineman, M. A. & Mykitiuk, R., eds., The Public Nature of Private Violence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert [1964](1991) One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Del (1981) Battered Wives. San Francisco: Volcano Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McColl, William D. (2002) “Theory and Practice in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court,” in Nolan, J. L., ed., Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2001) “Rights, Religion and Community: Approaches to Violence Against Women in the Context of Globalization,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirchandani, Rekha (1989) The Battered Women's Movement: Therapy or Transformation?” M.A. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Nardulli, Peter F., et al. (1988) The Tenor of Justice: Criminal Courts and the Guilty Plea Process. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, James L., ed. (1998) The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century's End. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, James L. (2001) Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, James L. (2002a) Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nolan, James L. (2002b) “Therapeutic Adjudication,” 39 Society 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Susan M. (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M., & Dzur, Albert W. (2004) “Revisiting Informal Justice: Restorative Justice and Democratic Professionalism,” 38 Law & Society Rev. 139–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parnas, Raymond (1970) “Judicial Responses to Intra-Family Violence,” 54 Minnesota Law Rev. 585–644. pmid/5492021Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole (1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pence, Ellen (1987) In Our Best Interest: A Process for Personal and Social Change. Duluth: Minnesota Program Development.Google Scholar
Pleck, Ellizabeth (1987) Domestic Tyranny: The Making of Social Policy Against Family Violence from Colonial Times to Present. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe (1906) “The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice,” 29 American Bar Association Report 395. Reprinted in 40 American Law Rev. 729 [1968].Google Scholar
Ptacek, James (1999) Battered Women in the Courtroom: The Power of Judicial Responses. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith (1982) “Managerial Judges,” 96 Harvard Law Rev. 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, Judith (1985) “Managerial Judges: The Potential Costs,” 45 Public Administration Rev. 686.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith (2002) “Mediating Preferences: Litigant Preferences for Process and Judicial Preferences for Settlement,” 2002 J. of Dispute Resolution 155.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George (2000) The McDonaldization of Society, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ray (1999a) “Court Cracks Down on Domestic Violence,” Salt Lake Tribune, 8 Nov., C-1.Google Scholar
Rivera, Ray (1999b) “More Judges to Rule on Family Woes: Domestic-violence court expands to cover caseloads; More Judges to Rule on Family,” Salt Lake Tribune, 3 Feb., D-1.Google Scholar
Rolly, Paul (1997) “Domestic Abuse Court Feeling the Strain,” Salt Lake Tribune, 29 Dec., D-2.Google Scholar
Schechter, Susan (1982) Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane (1992) “Just the Facts, Ma'am: Sexualized Violence, Evidentiary Habits, and the Revision of Truth,” 37 New York Law School Law Rev. 123.Google Scholar
Schneider, Elizabeth M. (2000) Battered Women & Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, & Sarat, Austin (1989) “Dispute Processing in Law and Legal Scholarship: From Institutional Critique to the Reconstruction of the Juridical Subject,” 66 Denver University Law Rev. 437.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1996) Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1999) “How Americans Became Civic,” in Skocpol, T. & Fiorina, M. P., eds., Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Steen, Sara (2002) “West Coast Drug Courts: Getting Offenders Morally Involved in the Criminal Justice Process,” in Nolan, J. L., ed., Drug Courts in Theory and in Practice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Straus, Murray, et al. (1980) Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R. (1985) “The Juvenile Court and Social Welfare: Dynamics of Progressive Reform,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 107.Google Scholar
Tauber, Jeffrey (1999) “Preface,” in Drug Courts: A Revolution in Criminal Justice. Washington, D.C.: Drug Strategies.Google Scholar
Tierney, Kathleen J. (1982) “The Battered Woman Movement and the Creation of the Wife-Beating Problem,” 29 Social Problems 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Betsy (2000) “The Trend Toward Specialized Domestic Violence Courts: Improvements on an Effective Innovation,” 68 Fordham Law Rev. 1285.Google Scholar
Walker, Lenore (1979) The Battered Woman. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Warchol, Glen (1999) “Domestic Violence Group Honors Four for Service,” Salt Lake Tribune, 15 Dec., B-2.Google Scholar
Weber, Max [1904–1905] (1958) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1946) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Ed. Gerth, Hans & Mills, C.Wright. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1968) Economy and Society, Ed. Roth, Guenther & Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Wharton, Carol S. (1987) “Establishing Shelters for Battered Women: Local Manifestations of a Social Movement,” 10 Qualitative Sociology 146–163.Google Scholar
Zorza, Joan (1992) “The Criminal Law of Misdemeanor Domestic Violence, 1970–1990,” 83 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 46–65. pmid/1561483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statute Cited

Violence Against Women Act, 42 U.S.C. Sections 10418, 13701, 13991, 13992, and 14036 (1994).Google Scholar