Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T23:14:13.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Truth, Reconciliation, and the Creation of a Human Rights Culture in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

James L. Gibson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the stated objectives of the truth and reconciliation process in South Africa was the creation of a political culture respectful of human rights. Thus, part of the “reconciliation” sought by the truth process was nurturing a set of cultural values among the populace that would make the gross human rights abuses that characterized the apartheid regime difficult if not impossible to reimplement in the future. Those creating the truth and reconciliation process assumed (hoped) that knowledge of the truth about the country's apartheid past would somehow contribute to the development of such a culture.

The purpose of this article is to investigate whether a culture respectful of human rights has been created in South Africa. Based on a survey of roughly 3,700 South Africans (concluded early in 2001), I begin by conceptualizing what it means for cultures and individuals to be supportive of human rights. This conceptual approach then provides guidance for operationalizing support for human rights—and in particular support for universalism in the rule of law—within the survey context. Thus, the first objective of my article is descriptive: To what extent has a human rights culture been created in South Africa?

But this article is about far more than describing the human rights culture of South Africa. The truth and reconciliation process hypothesizes that “truth” can contribute to this culture. But does it? With measures of the degree to which individual South Africans accept the truth about the country's apartheid past, this hypothesis can be rigorously tested. In addition, I explore a variety of additional explanations of support for human rights values, ranging from experiences under apartheid to attitudes toward South Africans of a different race. I conclude that whether a South African prefers a universalistic approach to the rule of law depends upon truth acceptance, interracial attitudes, and support for strong majoritarianism. Still, even with controls, racial differences in attitudes toward the rule of law persist in contemporary South Africa. Perhaps the most important contribution of this article is its evidence that the truth—participation in a country's collective memory—can affect the values that individual citizens hold.

Type
Articles Of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 5 - 40
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This is a revised version of a paper delivered at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 25–28, 2002, Chicago, Illinois. This research has been supported by the Law and Social Sciences Program of the National Science Foundation (SES 9906576). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The project is a collaborative effort between Amanda Gouws, Department of Political Science, University of Stellenbosch (South Africa), and me. I am indebted to Charles Villa-Vicencio, Helen Macdonald, Paul Haupt, Nyameka Goniwe, Fanie du Toit, Erik Doxtader, and the staff of the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (South Africa), where I am a Distinguished Visiting Research Scholar, for the many helpful discussions that have informed my understanding of the truth and reconciliation process in South Africa. I also appreciate the research assistance of Eric Lomazoff of the Russell Sage Foundation.

References

Almond, Gabriel A., & Verba, Sidney (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, Richard W. (1970) “Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research,” 1 J. of Cross-Cultural Psychology 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., & Stanley, Julian C. (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Cook, Thomas D., & Campbell, Donald T. (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
De Kock, Eugene (1998) A Long Night's Damage: Working for the Apartheid State. Saxonwold, South Africa: Contra Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (1999) Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (2000) “Social Norms: Internationalization, Persuasion, and History,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. (1998) “Putting Up With Fellow Russians: An Analysis of Political Tolerance in the Fledgling Russian Democracy,” 51 Political Research Q. 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. (2003) “Russian Attitudes towards the Rule of Law: An Analysis of Survey Data,” in Galligan, D. J. & Kurkchiyan, M., eds., Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. (2004) Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? New York: Russell Sage Foundation, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., & Caldeira, Gregory A. (1996) “The Legal Cultures of Europe,” 30 Law & Society Rev. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., & Gouws, Amanda (1997) “Support for the Rule of Law in the Emerging South African Democracy,” 152 International Social Science J. 173–91.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., & Gouws, Amanda (2000) “Social Identities and Political Intolerance: Linkages Within the South African Mass Public,” 44 American J. of Political Science 278–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., & Gouws, Amanda (2003) Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Graubard, Stephen R. (2001) “Preface to the Issue ‘Why South Africa Matters,' 130 Daedalus V–VIII.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla (2000) “Same Species, Different Animal: How South Africa Compares to Truth Commissions Worldwide,” in Villa-Vicencio, C. & Verwoerd, W., eds., Looking Back Reaching Forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Cape Town: Univ. of Cape Town Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Erik P. (1998) “Democratic Theories and Authority Patterns in Contemporary Russian Politics,” in Eckstein, H., Fleron, F. J. Jr., Hoffmann, E. P., & Reisinger, W. M. (with R. Ahl, R. Bova, & P. G. Roeder), eds., Can Democracy Take Root in Post-Soviet Russia? Explorations in State–Society Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Ibhawoh, Bonny (2000) “Between Culture and Constitution: Evaluating the Cultural Legitimacy of Human Rights in the African State,” 22 Human Rights Q. 838–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane-Berman, John (1993) Political Violence in South Africa. Johannesburg: South Africa Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz (2000) Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin (1990) “Marxism and the Rule of Law: Reflections After the Collapse of Communism,” 15 Law & Social Inquiry 633–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Martin A. (1972) “Urban Politics and Judicial Behavior,” 1 J. of Legal Studies 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Martin A. (1977) Urban Politics and Criminal Courts. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1994) “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited [1993 Presidential Address],” 59 American Sociological Rev. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Inga (1995) Imperfect Justice: An East-West German Diary. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Monique (2001) Young Warriors: Youth Politics, Identity and Violence in South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pauw, Jacques (1997) Into the Heart of Darkness: Confessions of Apartheid's Assassins. Johannesburg: Jonathan Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, & Haerpfer, Christian (1998) Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkin, Jeremy (1998) “The Development of a Human Rights Culture in South Africa,” 20 Human Rights Q. 628–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seekings, Jeremy (2000) The UDF—A History of the United Democratic Front in South Africa, 1983–1991. Cape Town: David Philip.Google Scholar
Singer, Eleanor, Hoewyk, John Van, & Maher, Mary P. (1998) “Does the Payment of Incentives Create Expectation Effects? 62 Public Opinion Q. 152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skapska, Grazyna (1990) “The Rule of Law from the East Central European Perspective,” 15 Law & Social Inquiry 699–706.Google Scholar
Slye, Ronald (2000) “Amnesty, Truth, and Reconciliation: Reflections on the South African Amnesty Process,” in Rotberg, R. I. & Thompson, D., eds., Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. Jr. (1992) “Legality in Soviet Political Culture: A Perspective on Gorbachev's Reforms,” in Lampert, N. & Rittersporn, G. T., eds., Stalinism: Its Nature and Aftermath: Essays in Honour of Moshe Lewin. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Spitz, Richard, & Chaskalson, Matthew (2000) The Politics of Transition: A Hidden History of South Africa's Negotiated Settlement. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission (1998) Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Villa-Vicencio, Charles, & Verwoerd, Wilhelm (2000) “Constructing a Report: Writing Up the ‘Truth,’” in Rotberg, R. I. & Thompson, D., eds., Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. (1976) Varieties of Political Behavior. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wilson, Richard A. (2001) The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar