Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:13:42.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

States and the Nation: State Cohorts and Amendment Clusters in the Process of Federal Constitutional Amendment in the United States, 1869-1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Edward T. Silva
Edward T. Silva*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, Emile Durkheim (1957: 50) explains that the state is the organ of a particular form of collective consciousness. This consciousness is not

so obscure and so indefinite as these collective representations that are spread throughout all societies-myths, religious or moral legends, and so on. … The representations that derive from the state are always more conscious of themselves, and of their causes and their aims. They have been concerted in a way that is less obscured. The collective agency which plans them realizes better what it is about.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , February 1970 , pp. 445 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 by the Law and Society Association.

References

AMES, H.V. (1897) Proposed Amendments to the Constitution of the United States During the First Century of Its History. United States Congress, House Document 353, pt. 2, Fifty-fourth Congress, Second Session.Google Scholar
CASANOVA, P. G. (1965) Internal colonialism and national development,“ in Horowitz, I. L. (ed.) Studies in Comparative International Development, I, 4. Beverly Hills: Sage Pubns.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, E. (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GREER, S. and P., ORLEANS (1964) “Political sociology,” in Faris, R. L.. The Handbook of Modern Sociology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
HAMILTON, W. (1967) The Politics of Industry. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
HAY, S. (1967) The Response to Industrialism. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KERR, C. (1964) Labor and Management in Industrial Society. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
LEE et al. (1957-64) Methodological Considerations and Reference Tables. Vol. I of S. Kuznets and D. S. Thomas (eds.), Population Redistribution and Economic Growth, United States 1870-1950. Philadelphia: Amer. Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
LIVINGSTON, W.S. (1955) Federalism and Constitutional Change. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
LONG, L. [ed.] (1967) World Almanac and Book of Facts. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
RYDER, N. (1965) “The concept of the cohort in the study of social change.” Amer. Sociological Rev. 30 (December): 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SELZNICK, P. (1968) “The sociology of law.” New Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
SHILS, E. (1951) “The legislator and his environment.” Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 18 (Spring): 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SILLS, D. (1957) The Volunteers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
TAFT, P. (1966) “Violence in American labor disputes.” Annals of the Amer. Academy of Pol. and Social Sci. 364 (March): 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TANSILL, C. C. (1926) Proposed Amendments to the Constitution of the United States Introduced in Congress from December 4, 1889-July 2, 1926. United States Congress, Senate Document 93, Sixty-ninth Congress, First Session.Google Scholar
United States Congress, Senate (1931) Ratification of the Constitution and Amendments by the States. Document 240, Seventy-first Congress, Third Session.Google Scholar
VAN DEN BERGHE, P. L. (1967) Race and Racism. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
WASKOW, A. I. (1966) From Race Riot to Sit-In, 1919 and the 1960's. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar