Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:36:18.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professionalism and Monopoly of Expertise: Lawyers and Administrative Law, 1933–1937

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Ronen Shamir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study situates the response of various segments of the bar to the New Deal era of administrative expansion in the context of contemporary theories of the legal profession. I focus on the theoretical formulations of a market monopoly approach, a functionalist approach, and a systems approach to the study of professionalism and professional competition. I consider each approach in light of two foundational prisms: (1) the stratified composition of the bar necessarily leads to a corresponding variation in the response to changes in the legal environment; (2) at the elite level of the profession, there is considerable attention to changes that affect the law as a system of knowledge and as a resource around which lawyers establish their professional legitimacy as exclusive experts. I draw attention to the strategic mechanisms that lawyers invoked in order to deal with the inter- and intraprofessional competition that accompanied the expansion of the regulatory state.

Type
Change and Adaptation of Lawyers' Work: Evolving Theories
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , 1993 , pp. 361 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

I thank Richard Abel, Terry Halliday, Christine Harrington, Arthur Stinchcombe, and my anonymous reviewers for helpful and constructive comments from which I benefited greatly.

References

Abbott, Andrew (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1981) “Toward a Political Economy of Lawyers,” 1981 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1117.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1989a) American Lawyers. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1989b) “Comparative Sociology of Legal Professions,” in Abel & Lewis 1989.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., & Lewis, Philip S. C., eds. (1989) Lawyers in Society: Vol. 3, Comparative Theories. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1933a) Report of the Standing Committee on Commerce, Report of the Fifty-sixth Annual Meeting of American Bar Association. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1933b) Report of the Special Committee on Administrative Law, Report of the Fifty-sixth Annual Meeting of American Bar Association 407. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1934a) Report of the Standing Committee on Commerce, Report of the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of American Bar Association 439. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1934b) Report of the Special Committee on Administrative Law, Report of the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of American Bar Association 539. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1936a) General Sessions Proceedings, Annual Report of the American Bar Association. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (1936b) Assembly Proceedings, Annual Report of the American Bar Association. Chicago: American Bar Association.,.Google Scholar
American Liberty League (1936) “Professors and the New Deal,” American Liberty League Document no. 91, p. 2 (Jan.).Google Scholar
Arnold, Thurman W. (1934) “Trial by Combat and the New Deal,” 47 Harvard Law Rev. 913.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. W. (1985) “Without the Law”: Administrative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Nineteenth-Century England. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Association of American Law Schools (1933) Handbook of the Association of American Law Schools and Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Association of American Law Schools.Google Scholar
Association of American Law Schools (1934) Handbook of the Association of American Law Schools and Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Association of American Law Schools.Google Scholar
Association of American Law Schools (1935) Handbook of the Association of American Law Schools and Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Association of American Law Schools.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. (1976) Unequal Justice. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Beck, James M. (1933a) “The Future of the Constitution,” 19 American Bar Association J. 493.Google Scholar
Beck, James M. (1933b) “The NRA Is Unconstitutional,” Fortune Mag., p. 48 (Nov.).Google Scholar
Botein, Stephen (1983) “‘What We Shall Meet Afterwards in Heaven’: Judgeship as a Symbol for Modern American Lawyers,” in Geison, G. L., ed., Professions and Professional Ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Rush C. (1934) Assembly Proceedings, Report of the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of American Bar Association 99. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido (1982) A Common Law for the Age of Statutes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, R. M., & Whitehead, C. L. (1934) “Restriction of the Jurisdiction of the United States District Courts as to Contracts between the United States and Citizens,” Mississippi Law J., p. 168 (Dec).Google Scholar
Clark, Charles E. (1933) “Law Professor, What Now?” in Association of American Law Schools 1933:14.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles E. (1935) Address to the Association of American Law Schools, in Association of American Law Schools 1935:74.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1990) “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority,‘”11 Cardozo Law Rev. 919.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Rout-ledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fox, Frank B. (1935) “What about Administrative Tribunals?” 21 American Bar Association J. 376.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome (1930) Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano's.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, Felix (1935) Address to the Association of American Law Schools, in Association of American Law Schools 1935:90.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mitchell (1934) “Administrative Law in the United States,” 8 Tu-lane Law Rev. 483.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1984) “‘The Ideal and the Actual in the Law’: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers 1870–1910” in Gawalt, G. W., ed., The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Green, Leon (1934) “The Law Professor, the Lawyers' Brain Trust,” 7 American Law Schools Rev. 1031.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. (1987) Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine B. (1983) “The Formation of a New Specialty: The Administrative Bar.” Presented at Annual Meeting of the Law & Society Association, 2–5 June, Denver.Google Scholar
Hawley, Ellis W. (1966) The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, John P., & Laumann, Edward O. (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1977) The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1992) The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, Peter H. (1982) The New Deal Lawyers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. (1934) “The Bar and the New Deal,” in Association of American Law Schools 1934:113.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1986) Legal Realism at Yale, 1927–1960. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali S. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Magali S. (1989) “The Changing Functions of Lawyers in the Liberal State: Reflections for Comparative Analysis,” in Abel & Lewis 1989.Google Scholar
Lisagor, Nancy, & Lispius, Frank (1988) A Law unto itself: The Untold Story of the Law Firm, Sullivan and Cromwell. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
McFarland, Carl (1934) “Administrative Agencies in Government and the Effect Thereon of Constitutional Government,” 20 American Bar Association J. 612.Google Scholar
Miller, Benjamin (1936) New York State Bar Association Annual Meeting and Reports for 1935, p. 330.Google Scholar
Miller, Nathan L. (1934) “The Constitution and Modern Trends,” Report of the Fifty-seventh Annual Meeting of American Bar Association 348. Chicago: American Bar Assocation.Google Scholar
New York State Bar Association (1936) Address of Julius Henry Cohen. Annual Meetings and Reports for 1935, p. 236.Google Scholar
New York State Bar Association (1937) Annual Meetings and Reports for 1936, p. 213.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, & Selznick, Philip (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Octagon.Google Scholar
Ransom, William L. (1936) “Which Road for the Legal Profession?” 22 American Bar Association J. 21.Google Scholar
Robinson, William H. Jr. (1935) “Lawyers and Practitioners: A Study in Contrasts,” 21 American Bar Association J. 277.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1980) “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal,” 10 Politics & Society 155.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen (1982) Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Hal H. (1934) “The National Industrial Recovery Act: Is It Constitutional?” 20 American Bar Association J. 273.Google Scholar
Stone, Harlan F. (1934) “The Public Influence of the Bar,” 48 Harvard Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Thacher, Thomas D. (1935) “Invasions of Judicial Powers,” New York State Bar Association Annual Meeting and Reports for 1934, p. 94.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary (1934) Jurisdiction of United States District Courts over Suits relating to Orders of State Administrative Boards. 73d Cong., 2d sess., 27 Feb.-1 March.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary (1933) Limiting Jurisdiction of Federal Courts. 73d Cong., 1st Sess., 26 May.Google Scholar
Verkuil, Paul R. (1978) “The Emerging Concept of Administrative Procedure,” 78 Columbia Law Rev. 258.Google Scholar
Whitman, Charles S. (1934) “The Bar and the Future,” 25 Proceedings of the Nebraska State Bar 104.Google Scholar
Wood, Frederick H. (1934) “Some Constitutional Aspects of the National Recovery Program,” 20 American Bar Association J. 284.Google Scholar