Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T07:16:27.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The People's Law versus Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Steven A. Kohm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the popular American daytime courtroom programs Judge Judy and People's Court and comparatively analyzes two distinct models of law and justice developed in these shows. Using the techniques of qualitative media analysis, I argue that Judge Judy represents a shift in the way popular culture imagines the role of law in the lives of ordinary people. This shift accords with neoliberal notions of governance and individual self-responsibility for protection against risk. Conversely, People's Court represents an older, liberal-legal model of law that emphasizes individual rights, public participation in the court process, and due process. By demonstrating the supersession of Judge Judy justice over that of People's Court, I argue that this shift in the way law is imagined in American popular culture signals wider shifts in American and indeed international attitudes toward the law in our everyday lives.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 693 - 728
Copyright
© 2006 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Altheide, David (1996) Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimow, Michael (1999) “Justice With An Attitude: Judge Judy and the Daytime Television Bench,” 38 Judges J. 1–15.Google Scholar
Banks, Taunya L. (2003) “Will the Real Judge Stand-Up: Virtual Integration on TV Reality Court Shows,” Picturing Justice: The On-Line J. of Law & Popular Culture, January, http://www.usfca.edu/pj/realjudge_banks.htm.Google Scholar
Benson, Jim (2005) “Judy Judy Judy,” 135 Broadcasting & Cable 12.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O'Barr, William M. (1990) Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1979) The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Friedman, James (2002) Reality Squared: Televisual Discourse on the Real. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David (2001) The Culture of Control. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J., et al. (1994) Law and Community in Three American Towns. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karno, Valerie (2004) “Remote Justice: Tuning in to Small Claims, Race, and the Reinvigoration of Civic Judgment,” 30 Punishment, Politics, and Culture: Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 261–82.Google Scholar
Lenz, Timothy O. (2003) Changing Images of Law in Film and Television Crime Stories. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Leonard, David P. (1988) “Perry Mason to Kurt Waldheim: The Pursuit of Justice in Contemporary Film and Television,” 12 Legal Studies Forum 377–88.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1987) “Images of Law in Everyday Life: The Lessons of School, Entertainment, and Spectator Sports,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machura, Stefan, & Ulbrich, Stefan (2001) “Law in Film: Globalizing the Hollywood Courtroom Drama,” 28 J. of Law & Society 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Susan (2004) “‘I Think We Need a New Name for It’: The Meeting of Documentary and Reality TV,” in Murray, S. & Ouellette, L., eds., Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Mary B., & Armstrong, G. Blake (1998) “The Color of Crime: Perceptions of Caucasians' and African Americans' Involvement in Crime,” in Cavender, G. & Fishman, M., eds., Entertaining Crime. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ouellette, Laurie (2004) “‘Take Responsibility for Yourself’: Judge Judy and the Neoliberal Citizen,” in Murray, S. & Ouellette, L., eds., Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ouellette, Laurie, & Anderson, Carolyn (1997) “Reading the Talk Show: The Politics of Talk Soup,” in Edgerton, G. et al., eds., In the Eye of the Beholder: Critical Perspectives in Popular Film and Television. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State Univ. Popular Press.Google Scholar
Porsdam, Helle (1994) “Law as Soap Opera and Game Show: The Case of The People's Court,” J. of Popular Culture, 28: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Patricia J. (1995) Public Intimacies: Talk Show Participants and Tell-All TV. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rafter, Nicole (2000) Shots in the Mirror: Crime Films and Society. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (1996) “Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies,” in Barry, A. et al., eds., Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Rationalities of Government. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Cassandra (2002) “Scarlet Letter or Chastity Belt? What Legal Dramas of the Twenty-First Century are “Telling” Law Students About a Career in Law,” Legal Ethics, 5: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shattuc, Jane M. (1997) The Talking Cure: TV Talk Shows and Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sheindlin, Judy (1996) Don't Pee on My Leg and Tell Me It's Raining. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sheindlin, Judy (1999) Beauty Fades, Dumb Is Forever. New York: Cliff Street Books.Google Scholar
Sheindlin, Judy (2000a) Keep It Simple Stupid: You're Smarter Than You Look. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sheindlin, Judy (2000b) Win or Lose by How You Choose. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Slipock, Samantha (1998) “Judge Judy and the People's Court: The Phenomenon of the ‘Real Court’ Television Genre.” Unpublished paper, copy on file with author.Google Scholar
Steadman, Jana (2005) “TV Audience Special Study: African American Audience.” http://www.nielsenmedia.com (accessed 6 Nov. 2005).Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew (2001) Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wapner, Joseph A. (1987) A View from the Bench. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Eds., G. Roth and C. Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
White, Mimi (1992) Tele-Advising: Therapeutic Discourse in American Television. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1989) “Inventing Law in Local Settings: Rethinking Popular Legal Culture,” 98 Yale Law J. 1689–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1962).Google Scholar
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).Google Scholar