Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T18:57:32.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negotiations as a Mode of Dispute Settlement: Towards a General Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

P. H. Gulliver
P. H. Gulliver*
Affiliation:
York University, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a previous essay I sought to make a distinction, not an original one, between two processes of dispute settlement: adjudication, and negotiations (Gulliver, 1969: 17). This was not intended as an absolute distinction, for clearly there are certain features common to both. But I was emphasizing what seems to be a key factor: the existence or absence of a third-party adjudicator. Whilst recognizing that this distinction is not acceptable to some scholars in the sociology of law, and that some would not wish to give such importance to that key factor and to other associated processual characteristics, it is nevertheless worthwhile to examine further the processes of negotiation. There are at least two reasons for this. First, anthropologists have given rather little attention to the description and analysis of negotiations in the variety of societies and cultures which is their concern. Secondly, processes of negotiations occur in all societies, including of course our own Western ones, and I believe that there are common patterns to them, cross-culturally, which merit attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Summer 1973 , pp. 667 - 691
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1973.

References

AUBERT, V.A. (1969) “Law as a Way of Resolving Conflicts,” in Laura, NADER (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
DOUGLAS, Ann (1957) “The Peaceful Settlement of Industrial and Inter-group Disputes,” 1 Journal of Conflict Resolution 69.Google Scholar
ECKHOFF, T. (1966) “The Mediator, the Judge and the Administrator in Conflict Resolution,” 10 Acta Sociologica 158.Google Scholar
ECKHOFF, T. (1969) “The Mediator and the Judge,” in V., AUBERT (ed.) Sociology of Law. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
GOULDNER, A.W. (1965) Wildcat Strike. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1971) Neighbours and Networks. Neighbours and Networks: California University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1969) “Introduction: Case Studies cf Law in Non-Western Societies,” in Laura, NADER (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1963) Social Control in an African Society. Social Control in an African Society: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
LANE, T. and K., ROBERTS (1971) Strike at Pilkingtons. London: Collins/Fontana.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl and E. Adamson, HOEBEL (1941) The Cheyenne Way. The Cheyenne Way: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
ROSS, H.L. (1970) Settled Out of Court. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
SCHELLING, Thomas (1963) The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar