Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:35:59.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legal Profession and Legal Services: Explorations in Local Bar Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Harry P. Stumpf ,
Henry P. Schroerluke  and
Forrest D. Dill
Harry P. Stumpf
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Henry P. Schroerluke
Affiliation:
California Bar
Forrest D. Dill
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“Students of law and society have grown increasingly aware of the contribution to the character of the legal system made by the attorney in his professional role.” In his capacity as “gate keeper to the courts” the private attorney is a significant actor in the judicial process, especially at the community level (Jacob and Vines, 1963: 251). His decisions, formulated within limits set by the norms, rules, and expectations of the profession (i.e., bar associations) initially determine who has a right to lodge a grievance, at what cost, under what conditions, and to what ends.

The Legal Services Program of the Office of Economic Opportunity provides a unique opportunity to explore the professional values and attitudes of lawyers, because the Program challenges the traditional prerogatives of bar associations in controlling access to the legal resources. The three aspects of the Program representing the most serious challenge to the traditional practice of law are: (1) OEO's insistence that local programs utilize the legal process as an instrument of social and political reform on behalf of the poor; (2) the conscious, though wavering, effort to structure programs so as to insure their independence from local bar domination; and (3) the concept and practice of “maximum feasible participation” of the poor in the actual management of local programs. The response of private practitioners to the OEO challenge provides some insights into such matters as the profession's criteria for gatekeeping and the lawyers' instruments of control.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , August 1971 , pp. 47 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

AUTHORS' NOTE: Initial work on the case study presented herein was supported by the Center for the Study of Law and Society, University of California, Berkeley. The larger research project was performed pursuant to a contract with the Office of Economic Opportunity, Executive Office of the President, Washington, D.C., 20506. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policy of any agency of the United States Government. This paper is a condensation of a paper by the same title delivered at the Sixty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, 1970.

References

BARNES, Peter (1971) “Reagan versus the Poverty Lawyers,” 165 New Republic (Western Edition, January 23) 16.Google Scholar
CAHN, Edgar S. and Jean C., CAHN (1964) “The War on Poverty: A Civilian Perspective,” 73 Yale Law Journal 1317.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E. (1970) “Store Front Lawyers in San Francisco,” 7 Transaction 64.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E., Jan, HOWARD, and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1966) “Civil Justice and the Poor: Issues for Sociological Research,” 1 Law and Society Review 67.Google Scholar
DEWEY, Frank L. (1970) “What Happened in Albuquerque,” 28 The Legal Aid Briefcase 227.Google Scholar
DILL, Forrest D. (1966) “Waging the War on Poverty: A Case Study of the Solimar County Legal Services Project,” Berkeley: Center for the Study of Law and Society. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Evaluation Manual: Legal Services Programs, Section 205 Grants. (1967) Washington: Legal Services Program.Google Scholar
HANNON, Philip J. (1969) “The Leadership Problem in the Legal Services Program,” 4 Law and Society Review 235.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review [Note] (1967) “Neighborhood Law Offices: The New Wave in Legal Services for the Poor,” 80 Harvard Law Review 805.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert and Kenneth, VINES (1963) “The Role of the Judiciary in American State Politics,” in Glendon, SCHUBERT, Judicial Decision-Making. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
KLONOSKI, James R. and Robert I., MENDELSOHN (1970) “The Allocation of Justice: A Political Approach,” in James R. KLONOSKI and Robert I. MENDELSOHN, The Politics of Local Justice. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Landerman County Bar Association (1966) “Review of Elections, Votes, and Plebiscites.” Unpublished.Google Scholar
NADER, Ralph (1969) “Law School and Law Firms,” 161 New Republic (October 11) 20.Google Scholar
NONET, Phillipe and Jerome E., CARLIN (1968) “The Legal Profession,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: The MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
PARKER, Charles J. (1966) “The Relations of Legal Services Programs with Local Bar Associations,” in Conference Proceedings: National Conference on Law and Poverty. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
PYE, A. Kenneth (1966) “The Role of Legal Services in the Antipoverty Program,” 31 Law and Contemporary Problems 211.Google Scholar
Report of the American Assembly on Law and the Changing Society (1968) Chicago: Center for Continuing Education. SAVOY, Paul N. (1970) “Toward a New Politics of Legal Education,” 79 Yale Law Journal 444.Google Scholar
SCHUBERT, Glendon A. (1968) “Behavioral Jurisprudence,” 2 Law and Society Review 409.Google Scholar
Study of OEO Legal Services Program, Bay Area, California (1968).Google Scholar
STUMPF, Harry P. (1970) “The Legal Profession and Legal Services,” Delivered at the Sixty-sixth Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, California, September 8–12.Google Scholar
STUMPF, Harry P. (1968) “Law and Poverty: A Political Perspective,” 1968 Wisconsin Law Review 701.Google Scholar
STUMPF, Harry P. and Robert J., JANOWITZ (1969) “Judges and the Poor: Bench Responses to Federally Financed Legal Services,” 21 Stanford Law Review 1058.Google Scholar
WATSON, Richard A. and Randal G., DOWNING (1969) The Politics of Bench and Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
WELLS, Richard S. (1970) “Lawyers and the Allocation of Justice,” in James R. KLONOSKI and Robert I. MENDELSOHN, The Politics of Local Justice. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, Eric W. (1967) “Competition in Legal Services Under the War on Poverty,” 19 Stanford Law Review 579.Google Scholar