Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T13:15:08.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Change and Sentencing Norms in the Wake of Booker: The Impact of Time and Place on Drug Trafficking Cases in Federal Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Mona Lynch  and
Marisa Omori
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The federal sentencing guidelines have lost some authoritative force since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a series of recent cases that the guidelines are advisory, rather than presumptive, in determining criminal sentences. While these court decisions represent a dramatic legal intervention, sociolegal scholarship suggests that organizational norms are likely to change slowly and less dramatically than the formal law itself. The research reported here looks specifically at the consequences of such legal transformations over time and across locale, using multilevel analysis of U.S. Sentencing Commission sentence outcome data from 1993 to 2009. Our findings suggest that districts vary considerably from each other in sentencing practices over the time period studied, and that there is relative within-district stability of outcomes within districts over time, including in response to the Supreme Court's mandates. We also find that policy change appears to influence the mechanisms by which cases are adjudicated in order to reach normative outcomes. Finally, we find that the relative district-level reliance upon mandatory minimums, which were not directly impacted by the guidelines changes, is an important factor in how drug trafficking cases are adjudicated. We conclude that local legal practices not only diverge in important ways across place, but also become entrenched over time such that top-down legal reform is largely reappropriated and absorbed into locally established practices.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 411 - 445
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We would like to thank Amy Baron-Evans, John Hipp, Richard McCleary, Lou Reedt, Elina Treyger, as well as the LSR editors and anonymous reviewers for their thoughts, comments, and advice. An earlier version of this article was presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Stanford Law School. This project was supported by Grant No. 2010-IJ-CX-0010 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.

References

References

Abel, Richard L. (2010) “Law and Society: Project and Practice,” 6 Annual Rev. of Law & Social Science 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albonetti, Celesta (1997) “Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of Defendant Characteristics, Guilty Pleas, and Departures on Sentence Outcomes for Drug Offenses, 1991–1992,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 789–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Mark (2004) “Feeney's Folly: Why Appellate Courts Should Review Departures from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines with Deference,” 90 Iowa Law Rev. 269–312.Google Scholar
Baron-Evans, Amy, & Stith, Kate (2012) “Booker Rules,” 160 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1631–743.Google Scholar
Berman, Douglas (2010) “Afternoon Keynote Address: Encouraging (and Even Requiring) Prosecutors to Be Second-Look Sentencers,” 19 Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Rev. 249–441.Google Scholar
Carlen, Pat (2002) “Carceral Clawback: The Case of Women's Imprisonment in Canada,” 4 Punishment & Society 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheliotis, Leonidas (2006) “How Iron Is the Iron Cage of New Penology? The Role of Human Agency in the Implementation of Criminal Justice Policy,” 8 Punishment & Society 313–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Thomas (1985) “Examining Local Legal Culture,” 10 Law & Social Inquiry 449–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Jo (1995) “The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing,” 100 American J. of Sociology 1157–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerner, Jill K., & Demuth, Stephen (2010) “The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts,” 27 Justice Q. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, James, & Jacob, Herbert (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, James, et al. (1988) The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Engen, Rodney (2011) “Racial Disparity in the Wake of Booker/Fanfan: Making Sense of “Messy” Results and Other Challenges for Sentencing Research,” 10 Criminology & Public Policy 1139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Amy, & Ward, Geoff (2011) “Examining District Variation in Sentencing in the Post-Booker Period,” 23 Federal Sentencing Reporter 318–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, & Kamin, Sam (1996) “The Effect of ‘Three Strikes and You're Out’ on the Courts: Looking Back to See the Future,” in Shichor, D., & Sechrest, D. K., eds., Three Strikes and You're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: 135–54. Sage.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, & Simon, Jonathan (1992) “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications,” 30 Criminology 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischman, Joshua B., & Schanzenbach, Max M. (2012) “Racial Disparities under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Judicial Discretion and Mandatory Minimums,” 9 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 729–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grattet, Ryken, & Jenness, Valerie (2008) “Transforming Symbolic Law into Organizational Action: Hate Crime Policy and Law Enforcement Practice,” 87 Social Forces 501–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heumann, Milton (1978) Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hofer, Paul J. (2007) “United States V. Booker as a Natural Experiment: Using Empirical Research to Inform the Federal Sentencing Policy Debate,” 6 Criminology & Public Policy 433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, Paul J. (2011) “Has Booker Restored Balance? A Look at Data on Plea Bargaining and Sentencing,” 23 Federal Sentencing Reporter 326–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, Paul J. (2013) “The Commission Defends an Ailing Hypothesis: Does Judicial Discretion Increase Demographic Disparity?,” 25 Federal Sentencing Reporter 311–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holder, Eric (2010) Memorandum from Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, to All Federal Prosecutors (May 19, 2010) . Available at: http://www.justice.gov/oip/holder-memo-charging-sentencing.pdf.Google Scholar
Holder, Eric (2013) Remarks at the Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association's House of Delegates . (August 12). Available at: http://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/ag/speeches/2013/ag-speech-130812.html.Google Scholar
Johnson, Brian, et al. (2008) “The Social Context of Guidelines Circumvention: The Case of Federal District Courts,” 46 Criminology 737–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautt, Paula (2002) “Location, Location, Location: Interdistrict and Intercircuit Variation in Sentencing Outcomes for Federal Drug-Trafficking Offenses,” 19 Justice Q. 633–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemshall, Hazel, & Maguire, Mike (2001) “Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penality: The Multi-Agency Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders,” 3 Punishment & Society 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, John H., & Ulmer, Jeffery T. (2002) “Downward Departures for Serious Violent Offenders: Local Court “Corrections” to Pennsylvania's Sentencing Guidelines,” 40 Criminology 897–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (1998) “Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 839–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2011) “Mass Incarceration, Legal Change and Locale: Understanding and Remediating American Penal Overindulgence,” 10 Criminology and Public Policy 671–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2012) “Theorizing the Role of the ‘War on Drugs’ in US Punishment,” 16 Theoretical Criminology 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddan, Sean, et al. (2012) “Sympathy for the Devil: An Exploration of Federal Judicial Discretion in the Processing of White-Collar Offenders,” 37 American J. of Criminal Justice 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, Candace (1993) Politics and Plea Bargaining: Victims’ Rights in California. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mustard, David B. (2001) “Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts,” 44 J. of Law and Economics 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Ilene, & Schulhofer, Stephen J. (1992) “A Tale of Three Cities: An Empirical Study of Charging and Bargaining Practices under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” 66 Southern California Law Rev. 501–66.Google Scholar
Piehl, Anne Morrison, & Bushway, Shawns (2007) “Measuring and Explaining Charge Bargaining,” 23 J. of Quantitative Criminology 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia, & Skrondal, Anders (2005) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Rehavi, M. Marit, & Starr, Sonia (2012) “Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Charging and Its Sentencing Consequences,” U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper (12-002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Gwen (2002) “Exploring Risk Management in Probation Practice: Contemporary Developments in England and Wales,” 4 Punishment & Society 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saris, Patti (2011) Testimony Before the, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Committee on the Judiciary? United States House of Representatives.Google Scholar
Savelsberg, Joachim J. (1992) “Law That Does Not Fit Society: Sentencing Guidelines as a Neoclassical Reaction to the Dilemmas of Substantivized Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1346–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J., & Nagel, Ilene (1989) “Negotiated Pleas under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The First Fifteen Months,” 27 American Criminal Law Rev. 231–88.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J., & Nagel, Ilene (1996) “Plea Negotiations under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Guideline Circumvention and Its Dynamics in the Post-Mistretta Period,” 91 Northwestern University Law Rev. 1284–1316.Google Scholar
Shermer, Lauren O., & Johnson, Brian J. (2010) “Criminal Prosecutions: Examining Prosecutorial Discretion and Charging Decisions in U.S. Federal District Courts,” 27 Justice Q. 394–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stith, Kate, & Cabranes, Jose (1998) Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stuntz, William J. (2011) The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, John R. (2013) “Symbol and Substance: Effects of California's Three Strikes Law on Felony Sentencing,” 47 Law & Society Rev. 37–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T. (2005) “The Localized Uses of Federal Sentencing Guidelines in Four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of Processual Order,” 28 Symbolic Interaction 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T. (2012) “Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research,” 29 Justice Q. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T., & Johnson, Brian D. (2004) “Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis,” 42 Criminology 137–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T., & Light, Michael (2011) “Beyond Disparity: Changes in Federal Sentencing after Booker and Gall?,” 23 Federal Sentencing Reporter 333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T., et al. (2010) “Trial Penalties in Federal Sentencing: Extra-Guidelines Factors and District Variation,” 27 Justice Q. 560–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T., et al. (2011a) “Racial Disparity in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision,” 10 Criminology & Public Policy 1077–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulmer, Jeffery T., et al. (2011b) “The “Liberation” of Federal Judges’ Discretion in the Wake of the Booker/ Fanfan Decision: Is There Increased Disparity and Divergence Between Courts?,” 28 Justice Q. 799–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USSC (2004) Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing: An Assessment of How Well the Federal Criminal Justice System is Achieving the Goals of Sentencing Reform . Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2006) Final Report on the Impact of United States V. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2009) An Overview of the United States Sentencing Commission. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2010a) 2010 Federal Guidelines Manual. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2010b) Demographic Differences in Federal Sentencing Practices: An Update of the Booker Report's Multivariate Regression Analysis. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2011) Report to the Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
USSC (2012) Report on the Continuing Impact of United States V. Booker on Federal Sentencing. Washington, DC: US Sentencing Commission.Google Scholar
Van Slyke, Shanna, & Bales, William D. (2012) “A Contemporary Study of the Decision to Incarcerate White-Collar and Street Property Offenders,” 14 Punishment & Society 217–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Geoff, et al. (2009) “Does Racial Balance in Workforce Representation Yield Equal Justice? Race Relations of Sentencing in Federal Court Organizations,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 757–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmot, Keith, & Spohn, Cassia (2004) “Prosecutorial Discretion and Real-Offense Sentencing: An Analysis of Relevant Conduct under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines,” 15 Criminal Justice Policy Rev. 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, JawJeong, & Spohn, Cassia (2010) “Interdistrict Disparity in Sentencing in Three U.S. District Courts,” 56 Crime & Delinquency 290–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).Google Scholar
Pepper v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 1229 (2011).Google Scholar
Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007).Google Scholar
Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, (1996).Google Scholar
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007).Google Scholar