Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:43:38.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Leadership Problem in the Legal Services Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Philip J. Hannon*
Affiliation:
Skidmore College
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sargent Shriver, the first Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity, forecast at the outset that the lawyers in the legal services program would come to be recognized as the heavy artillery in the war on poverty (Shriver, 1966: 219). Shriver's success as a soothsayer was considerable. Poverty lawyers have proven to be among the most effective weapons in the war on poverty's arsenal. In practice it seems that many of the lawyer's skills and much of his legal training are helpful and even powerful when directed at the legal problems of the poor. Nevertheless, one wonders how much credit for the poverty lawyer's success can properly be attributed to OEO's leadership. There never really was reason to doubt the lawyer's fire power. But the record reveals much reason to doubt whether his potential power has been used efficiently and with maximum efficacy. An examination of OEO's belated efforts to orient the local legal services offices toward more meaningful targets leads to the belief that the strength of the program lies in the professional training and prodigious labors of the lawyers in the field and its weakness lies in the manner in which OEO has constructed and conducted the legal services program.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 by the Law and Society Association.

References

BAMBERGER, E. C. (1966) “The legal services program of the Office of Economic Opportunity.” Notre Dame Lawyer 41, 6: 847852.Google Scholar
BROWNELL, E. A. (1951) Legal Aid in the United States. Rochester, N. Y.: Lawyers Cooperative.Google Scholar
CAHN, J. and E., CAHN (1964) “The war on poverty: civilian perspective.” Yale Law J. 73 (July): 13171352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARLIN, J. E. and J., HOWARD (1965) “Legal representation and class justice.” UCLA Law Rev. 12 (January): 381437.Google Scholar
GRIFFIN, B. W. (1968) CEB Legal Services Gazette 2 (July): 302304.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Rev. [Note] (1967) “Neighborhood law offices: the new wave in legal services for the poor.80 (February): 805850.Google Scholar
House of Delegates, Amer. Bar Assn. (1965) Resolution (February).Google Scholar
JOHNSON, L. B. (1964) “Message on poverty.” Congressional Q. Weekly Report 22 (January-March): 554557.Google Scholar
MAYER, M. (1967) The Lawyers. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
National Conference on Law and Poverty (1966) Conference Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Office of Economic Opportunity (1968) Newsletter—Law in Action (June).Google Scholar
Office of Economic Opportunity (1967a) Evaluation Manual: Legal Services Programs.Google Scholar
Office of Economic Opportunity (1967b) Newsletter—Law in Action (April, June).Google Scholar
Office of Economic Opportunity (1966) Guidelines for Legal Services Programs.Google Scholar
PYE, A. K. (1966) “The role of legal services in the antipoverty program.” Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (Winter): 211249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regional Legal Services Directors (1967) Conference Minutes.Google Scholar
SHRIVER, S. (1966) “National policy.” State Bar of California J. 41 (May-June): 219222.Google Scholar
SMITH, R. H. (1919) Justice and the Poor. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
State Bar of California J. (1965) “The ABC's of Legal Services Under OEO.” San Francisco. August 23 (mimeo).Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Employment, Manpower, and Poverty, Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare (1967) “Hearings on S. 1545” 90th Cong., First Sess., part 9.Google Scholar
WALD, P. M. (1965) Law and Poverty. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar