Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:01:29.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and Anthropology: A Case Study in Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

William Twining
William Twining*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“If the integration of law and anthropology is to flourish, it must be on a truly functional basis. Each must contribute to the dynamics of the other; each must add to the operative effectiveness of the other; each must nourish the other as a process. Mere static comparison, a paralleling of civilized rules of law with selected examples from sundry primitive tribes, is a sterile accomplishment.”

E. Adamson Hoebel“Law and Anthropology,” 32 Va.L.Rev. 835 (1946)

The partnership between Karl Llewellyn and E. Adamson Hoebel is generally regarded as the most successful example of collaboration between a lawyer and an anthropologist in the annals of Anglo-American scholarship. In many respects it is unique. There have been individuals who have been trained in both disciplines; a number of legal scholars have made extensive use of anthropological literature; jurisprudence has regularly provided ethnographers of law with some of their main concepts and in recent years there has been an extensive, if disjointed, dialogue between representatives of the two disciplines. But, Llewellyn and Hoebel apart, in respect of research there has been little alacrity on the part of lawyers and anthropologists in responding to calls for interdisciplinary co-operation. Moreover, there are sometimes signs of tension in relationships between the two groups, although for the most part such tensions are hidden behind the curtain of academic diplomacy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , Summer 1973 , pp. 561 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © The Law and Society Association, 1973.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1969-70) “Case Method Research in the Customary Law of Wrongs” Part I, 5 E.A.L.J. 247; Part II, 6 E.A.L.J. 20.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1969) “Customary Law of Wrongs in Kenya,” 17 Am. J. Comp. L. 573.Google Scholar
ALI, Obeid Hag. (1970) Anglo-American Studies of Tribal Law: Concepts and Methods. Unpublished L.L.M. thesis. The Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
ALLOTT, A.N., A.L., EPSTEIN and M., GLUCKMAN (1969) Introduction to Max GLUCKMAN (ed.) Ideas and Procedures in African Customary Law. London: Oxford University Press for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
BENEDICT, Ruth (1934) Patterns of Culture. Patterns of Culture: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
BOHANNAN, Paul (1957) Justice and Judgment among the Tiv of Nigeria. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CAIRNS, Huntington (1931) “Law and Anthropology,” 31 Columbia L. Rev. 32.Google Scholar
COSER, Lewis (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
COTRAN, E. (1966) “The Place and Future of Customary Law in East Africa” in East African Law Today. London. I.C.L.Q. Supplement No. 12.Google Scholar
COTRAN, E. (1968) Kenya: The Law of Marriage and Divorce. London: Sweet and Maxwell (Restatement of African Law Vol. 1).Google Scholar
CORY, H. and M.M., HARTNOLL (1945) Customary Law of the Haya Tribe. London: Percy Lund Humphries, for the International African Institute.Google Scholar
DIAMOND, A.S. (1971) Primitive Law, Past and Present. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
DIAMOND, A.S. (1965) The Comparative Study of Primitive Law. Hobhouse Memorial Trust Lecture. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
DOZIER, E.P. (1961) “Rio Grande Pueblos,” In Perspectives in American Indian Culture Change, H., SPICER (ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press 94–186.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, Ronald M. (1968) “Is Law a System of Rules?” in R., SUMMERS (ed). Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, A.L. (ed.) (1967) The Craft of Social Anthropology.Google Scholar
FALLERS, L. (1969) Law Without Precedent. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1949) Courts on Trial. Courts on Trial: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1955) The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia: Manchester University Press, for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute (2nd edition, 1967).Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1962) African Jurisprudence. The Advancement of Science 18:75:439-454.Google Scholar
GLUCKMAN, Max (1965) The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence. The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
GOODENOUGH, Ward H. (1970) Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1955) The Family Herds. International library of sociology and social reconstruction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1963) Social Control in an African Society. Social Control in an African Society: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
GULLIVER, P.H. (1969) “Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies,” in Laura, NADER (ed.) Law in Culture and Society (q.v.).Google Scholar
HART, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1935) 37 American Anthropologist 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1939) 41 American Anthropologist 440–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1940) The Political Organization and Law-Ways of the Comanche Indians, American Anthropological Association Memoir No. 54.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1942) Fundamental Legal Concepts as applied to the Study of Primitive Law. 51 Yale Law Journal 951-966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1946) “Law and Anthropology,” 32 Va. L. Rev. 835.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1952) Keresan Witchcraft. Keresan Witchcraft: 586-589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1954) The Law of Primitive Man. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1960) The authority systems of the Pueblos of the Southwestern United States. Vienna, Akten des 34, Internationalen Amerikan Congresses, pp. 555–563.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1960) “Three Studies in African Law,” 13 Stanford Law Review 412–442.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1964) “Karl Llewellyn — Anthropological Jurisprude,” 18 Rutgers L. Rev. 735.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1965) 67 American Anthropologist 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1969) “Keresan Pueblo Law” in NADER (ed.) 92.Google Scholar
HOEBEL, E. Adamson (1972) Anthropology: The Study of Man (4th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
HOLMES, O.W. Jr. (1897) “The Path of the Law” 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457.Google Scholar
HOLMES, O.W. Jr. (1913) “Profession of the Law” Speeches by Oliver Wendell Holmes. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
IFE UNIVERSITY: INSTITUTE OF AFRICAN STUDIES (1971) Conference on the Integration of Customary and Modern Legal Sysems in Africa. New York: A.P.C.Google Scholar
KENYA GOVERNMENT (1968) Report of the Kenya Commission on the Law of Marriage and Divorce. Report of the Kenya Commission on the Law of Marriage and Divorce: Government Printer.Google Scholar
KENYA GOVERNMENT (1968) Report of the Kenya Commission on the Law of Succession. Report of the Kenya Commission on the Law of Succession: Government Printer.Google Scholar
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude (1942) “Review of The Cheyenne Way,” 1 Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 155.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, K.N. (1930) “A Realistic Jurisprudence — The Next Step,” 30 Columbia Law Review 431.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, K.N. (1940) “The Normative, the Legal and the Law-Jobs” 49 Yale L.J. 1355.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, K.N. (1960) “The Common Law Tradition.” Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, K.N. and HOEBEL, Adamson, E. (1941) “The Cheyenne Way.” Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
LOWIE, Robert H. (1927) “Anthropology and Law,” in The Social Sciences. OGBURN, W.F. and A., GOLDENWEISER (eds.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin 50–57.Google Scholar
MALINOWSKI, B. (1926) Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
MALINOWSKI, B. (1942) “A New Instrument for the Interpretation of Law — Especially Primitive,” 51 Yale L.J. 1237.Google Scholar
MENTSCHIKOFF, Soia, (1960) Some Observations on the Adjudicatory Process (unpublished).Google Scholar
MENTSCHIKOFF, Soia, (1961) “Commercial Arbitration,” 61 Col. L. Rev. 846.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1965a) “The Ethnography of Law,” American Anthropologist, special issue, L. NADER (ed.) 67:6:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NADER, Laura (1965b) “The Anthropological Study of Law,” American Anthropologist 67 (6): 2:3-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NADER, Laura (1969) (ed.) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura, Klaus F., KOCH and Bruce, COX (1966) “The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographical Survey,” 7 Current Anthropology 267.Google Scholar
RATTRAY (1929) Ashanti Law and Constitution. Ashanti Law and Constitution: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
REISMAN, David (1951) “Towards an Anthropological Science of Law and the Legal Profession,” 57 American Journal of Sociology 121.Google Scholar
REISMAN, David (1957) “Law and Sociology” reprinted in Abundance for What? (1964) New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, A.I. (1961) “Anthropology on the Scrap-heap?” Journal of African Administration 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SMITH, Watson and John M., ROBERTS (1954) Zuni Law: A Field of Values. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Peabody Museum Papers.Google Scholar
TWINING, William L. (1964) The Place of Customary Law in the National Legal Systems of East Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar
TWINING, William L. (1968) “Two works of Karl Llewellyn II, 31 Modern L. Rev. 165.Google Scholar
TWINING, William L. (1968a) The Karl Llewellyn Papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School.Google Scholar
TWINING, William L. (1973) Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar