Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T06:33:18.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Judicial Abandonment of Blacks? Rethinking the “State Action” Cases of the Waite Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Pamela Brandwein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reconsiders the conventional wisdom that the Supreme Court definitively abandoned the freedmen to their former masters through the “state action” decisions of the 1870s and 1880s. Arguing that anachronisms distort our understanding of this critical period, I offer an historical institutional analysis of state action doctrine by recovering the legal categories, assumptions, and distinctions that constituted judicial discourse about the state action rule. Showing that federal power to protect blacks was more intact than scholars realize, I also add a perspective from the sociology of knowledge. By examining a series of modern developments that erased the contexts of the state action decisions, I show how institutional practices gave rise to the anachronisms that this article seeks to correct.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 343 - 386
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I am deeply grateful to the many people who offered comments on part or all of this material: Richard Aynes, Michael Les Benedict, Daniel Ernst, Bryant Garth, Mark Graber, Ronald Kahn, Ken Kersch, George Lovell, Julie Novkov, Daniel Sharfstein, Rogers Smith, Rick Valelly, G. Edward White, and Bryan Wildenthal. When this material was in its infancy, Sanford Levinson and Mark Tushnet provided highly useful remarks as well. I am also singularly thankful to Robert C. Post for his generous response and critical commentary at a vital time. Herbert Kritzer offered excellent advice, and I would like to convey my appreciation to him and the referees at LSR. I am most indebted, finally, to Douglas C. Dow, who has offered invaluable criticism from the earliest stages of this project.

References

References

Amar, Akhil Reed (1998) The Bill of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed (2000) “Supreme Court 1999 Term Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine,” 114 Harvard Law Rev. 26–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Charles A. (1913) An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick (1992) Race, Racism and American Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Belz, Herman (1976) A New Birth of Freedom: The Republican Party and Freedmen's Rights, 1861-1866. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Michael Les (1978) “Preserving Federalism: Reconstruction and the Waite Court,” 1978 Supreme Court Rev. 39–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. (1986) The Least Dangerous Branch. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Bowers, Claude (1929) The Tragic Era. New York: Literary Guild.Google Scholar
Brandwein, Pamela (1996) “Dueling Histories: Charles Fairman and William Crosskey Reconstruct “Original Understanding,”” 30 Law & Society Rev. 289–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandwein, Pamela (1999) Reconstructing Reconstruction: The Supreme Court and the Production of Historical Truth. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brandwein, Pamela (2006) The Civil Rights Cases and the Lost Language of State Neglect, in Kahn, R. & Kersch, K., eds., The Supreme Court and American Political Development. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Burgess, John W. (1905) Reconstruction and the Constitution. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Carr, Robert K. (1947) Federal Protection of Civil Rights. New York: Rinehart & Company.Google Scholar
Chafee, Zechariah Jr. (1920) Freedom of Speech. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Collins, Michael G. (1996) “Justice Bradley's Civil Rights Odyssey Revisited,” 70 Tulane Law Rev. 1979Google Scholar
Curtis, Michael Kent (1986) No State Shall Abridge. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1957) “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker,” 6 J. of Public Law 279.Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary (2000) Cold War Civil Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, William A. (1907) Reconstruction: Political and Economic, 1865-1877. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore (2000) “Color of Law,” in Levy, L. & Karst, K., eds., Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fairman, Charles (1949) “The Education of a Justice: Justice Bradley and Some of His Colleagues,” 1 Stanford Law Rev. 217–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Charles (1956) “Joseph P. Bradley,” in Dunham, A. & Kurland, P., eds., Mr. Justice. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. (1997) “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the Methodologies of Intellectual History,” 49 Stanford Law Rev. 1065–1110.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric (1988) Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Frantz, Laurent B. (1964) “Congressional Power to Enforce the Fourteenth Amendment Against Private Acts,” 73 Yale Law J. 1353–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, William (1979) Retreat from Reconstruction, 1869-79. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard (1993) The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert M. (2001) “A Free Ballot and a Fair Count” : The Department of Justice and Enforcement of Voting Rights in the South, 1877-1893. New York: Fordham Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert (1984) “Legal Thought and Legal Practice in the Age of American Enterprise, 1870-1920,” in Geison, G., ed., Professions and Professional Ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. (1991) Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John Chipman (1892) “Methods of Legal Education,” 1 Yale Law J. 159–61.Google Scholar
Gressman, Eugene (1952) “The Unhappy History of Civil Rights Legislation,” 50 Michigan Law Rev. 1323–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, James Parker (1913) Cases on Constitutional Law. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. (1992) Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Robert J. (1960) Quest for Equality. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law School Association (1918) Centennial History of the Harvard Law School. Boston: Harvard Law School Association.Google Scholar
Hirshson, Stanley P. (1962) Farewell to the Bloody Shirt: Northern Republicans and the Southern Negro, 1877-1893. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell (1920) Collected Legal Papers. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Hook, Jay (1993) “A Brief Life of James Bradley Thayer,” 88 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Hyman, Harold M., & Wiecek, William M. (1982) Equal Justice Under Law. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Jones, Alan (1967) “Thomas M. Cooley and ‘Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism’: A Reconsideration,” 53 J. of American History 751–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczorowski, Robert (1985) The Politics of Judicial Interpretation: The Federal Courts, the Department of Justice, and Civil Rights. New York: Oceana.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura (1996) Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Keener, William A. (1894) “The Inductive Method in Legal Education,” 17 American Bar Association Reports 473–90.Google Scholar
Kens, Paul (1997) Justice Stephen Field. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (2004) From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan (1999) Colorblind Injustice: Minority Voting Rights and the Undoing of the Second Reconstruction. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, J. Morgan (2003) “Review of Robert Goldman, Reconstruction and Black Suffrage: Losing the Vote in Reese and Cruikshank,” H-Pol, H-Net Reviews, January, http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=179141046324369.Google Scholar
Kurland, Philip, & Gerhard, Casper (1975) Landmark Briefs and Arguments of the Supreme Court. Arlington, VA: Univ. Publications of America.Google Scholar
Langdell, Christopher (1871) Cases on the Law of Contracts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
LaPiana, William (1994) Logic & Experience: The Origin of Modern American Legal Education. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Leonard W. (2000) “United States v. Cruikshank,” in Levy, L. & Karst, K., eds., Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lofgren, Charles A. (1987) The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Logan, Rayford (1954) The Betrayal of the Negro. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Lurie, Jonathan (1986) “Mr. Justice Bradley: A Reassessment,” 16 Seton Hall Law Rev. 343–75.Google Scholar
Mabry, John Mathews (1909) The Legislative and Judicial History of the Fifteenth Amendment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ Press.Google Scholar
Magrath, Peter C. (1963) Morrison R. Waite: The Triumph of Character. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Robert G. (1951) American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. (1995) “Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions,” 81 Virginia Law Rev. 947–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, Frank (1989) “Conceptions of Democracy in American Constitutional Argument,” 56 Tennessee Law Rev. 291.Google Scholar
Miller, Loren (1966) The Petitioners. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter, et al. (1986) American Constitutional Interpretation. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Gustavus (1912) History of the Supreme Court of the United States. Chicago: C. H. Kerr.Google Scholar
Novkov, Julie (2001) Constituting Workers, Protecting Women: Gender, Law, and Labor. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen, & Skowronek, Stephen (1996) “Institutions and Intercurrence: Theory Building in the Fullness of Time,” in Shapiro, I. & Hardin, R., eds., Political Order: Nomos XXXVIII. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Theophilus (1857) Law of Contracts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul (2000) “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics,” 94 American Political Science Rev. 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1985) Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, John Norton (1868) An Introduction to the Constitutional Law of the United States. New York: Hurd and Houghton.Google Scholar
Post, Robert C., & Siegel, Reva (2000) “Equal Protection by Law: Federal Antidiscrimination Legislation After Morrison and Kimel,” 110 Yale Law J. 441–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Mark J., & Kritzer, Herbert M. (2002) “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision-Making,” 96 American Political Science Rev. 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1984) “Historical Consciousness in Nineteenth Century America,” 89 American Historical Rev. 909–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991) Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael A. (2003) Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court during the Civil War Era. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton (1951) The Supreme Court and the Commander in Chief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rotnem, Victor W. (1942) “Clarifications of the Civil Rights Statutes,” 2 Bill of Rights Rev. 252–61.Google Scholar
Rotnem, Victor W. (1943) “The Federal Civil Right Not to Be Lynched,” 28 Washington Univ. Law Q. 57–73.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane (2004) “Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction,” 38 Law & Society Rev. 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Howard (1999) “The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education,” 17 Law & History Rev. 421–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, John (1971) “Justice Bradley's Evolving Concept of the Fourteenth Amendment,” 25 Rutgers Law Rev. 552.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey, & Spaeth, Harold (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. (1990) “Historism in Late Nineteenth Century Constitutional Thought,” 1990 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1431.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. (2002) “Comment: The Revision Thickens,” 20 Law and History Rev. 631–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Joel H. (1991) The American Political Nation, 1838-1893. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002) Visions of Politics, Vol. I, Regarding Method. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. (1988) “Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism” and the Future of Public Law,” 82 American Political Science Rev. 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur (1978) Theoretical Methods in Social History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thayer, James Bradley (1895) Cases on Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Charles W. Sever.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher (2000) “Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 911–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. (2000) American Constitutional Law, 3d ed. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1987) “The Politics of Equality in Constitutional Law: The Equal Protection Clause, Dr. Du Bois, and Charles Hamilton Houston,” 74 J. of American History 884–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urofsky, Melvin, & Finkelman, Paul (2002) A March of Liberty, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. (2004) The Two Reconstructions: The Struggle for Black Enfranchisement. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valelly, Richard M. (2007) “Partisan Entrepreneurship and Policy Windows: George Frisbie Hoar and the 1890 Federal Elections Bill,” in Skowronek, S. & Glassman, M., eds., Formative Acts. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Xi (1997) Trial of Democracy: Black Suffrage and Northern Republicans, 1860-1910. Athens, GA: Univ. of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Charles (1922) The Supreme Court in United States History. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward (2003) Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wiecek, William (1998) The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Lou Faulkner (1996) The Great South Carolina Ku Klux Klan Trials, 1871-1872. Athens: Univ. of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann (1974) The Strange Career of Jim Crow, 3d ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Benjamin F. (1942) Growth of American Constitutional Law. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Michael P. (1986) “Congressional Power under the Fourteenth Amendment: The Original Understanding of,” 3 Constitutional Commentary 123.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Baldwin v. Franks, 120 U.S. 678 (1887).Google Scholar
Blanchard v. Kansas, 16 F. 444 (1883).Google Scholar
Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1872).Google Scholar
Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1884).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).Google Scholar
Campbell v. Holt, 115 U.S. 620 (1885).Google Scholar
Charge to Grand Jury-Civil Rights Act, 30 F. Cas. 1005, 1006-07 (C. C. W. D. Tenn.) (1875).Google Scholar
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway v. Minnesota, 134 U.S. 418 (1890).Google Scholar
Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883).Google Scholar
Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1880).Google Scholar
Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651 (1884).Google Scholar
Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496 (1939).Google Scholar
Hornbuckle v. Toombs, 85 U.S. 648 (1874).Google Scholar
In re Brosnahan, 18 F. 62 (1883).Google Scholar
James v. Bowman, 190 U.S. 127 (1903).Google Scholar
Leavenworth v. United States, 92 U.S. 733 (1876).Google Scholar
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).Google Scholar
Logan v. United States, 144 U.S. 263, 288 (1892).Google Scholar
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961).Google Scholar
Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113 (1877).Google Scholar
Neal v. Delaware, 103 U.S. 370 (1880).Google Scholar
Pace v. Alabama, 106 U.S. 583 (1883).Google Scholar
People v. Salem, 20 Mich 452 (1870).Google Scholar
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. [16 Pet.] 618 (1842).Google Scholar
Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91 (1945).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 38 [16 Wall.] (1873).Google Scholar
United States v. Butler, 25 Fed. Cas. 213, 224 (No. 14,700) (C.C.D.S.C.) (1877).Google Scholar
United States v. Crosby, 25 F. Cas. 701 (No. 14, 893) (C.C.S.C.) (1871).Google Scholar
United States v. Cruikshank, 25 F. Cas. 707 (No. 14,897) (1874).Google Scholar
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876).Google Scholar
United States v. Hall, 26 F. Cas. 79, 81-82 (No. 15,282) (C.C.S.D. Ala.) (1871).Google Scholar
United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883).Google Scholar
United States v. Hodges, 203 U.S. 1 (1906).Google Scholar
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000).Google Scholar
United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966).Google Scholar
United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214, 218 (1876).Google Scholar
United States v. Rhodes, 27 F. Cas. 785, 787 (No. 16,151) (C. C. D. KY) (1867).Google Scholar
Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313 (1880).Google Scholar
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27.Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1875, 18 Stat. 335.Google Scholar
Enforcement Act of 1870, 16 Stat. 140.Google Scholar
Judiciary Act of 1891, 26 Stat. 826.Google Scholar
Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, 17 Stat. 13.Google Scholar
Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 108 Stat. 1941-1942.Google Scholar