Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-17T13:28:32.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Victim Assessment on Prosecutors' Screening Decisions: The Case of the New York County District Attorney's Office

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Elizabeth Anne Stanko
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines the discretionary judgments of the prosecutor during the screening of felony arrests. In particular, I emphasize the significance of the victim on the prosecutor's definition of serious crime and criminal activity. Descriptive accounts of felony screening illustrate how prosecutors rely on stereotyped characteristics to assess victim credibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , 1982 , pp. 225 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

*

This is a revised version of a paper delivered at the Northeastern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 1980. I would like to thank Lindsey Churchill, George Cole, Cynthia Enloe, Joel Grossman, Jim Thomas, Gaye Tuchman, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper.

References

ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1968) “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 36 University of Chicago Law Review 50.Google Scholar
BITTNER, Egon (1967) “The Police on Skid Row: A Study of Peace Keeping,” 32 American Sociological Review 699.Google Scholar
BLUMBERG, Abraham (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle.Google Scholar
CANNAVALE, Frank J. and William D., FALCON (1976) Witness Cooperation. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
CHAMBLISS, William and Robert, SEIDMAN (1971) Law, Order and Power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
CHICIROS, Theodore G. and Gordon P., WALDO (1975) “Socioeconomic Status and Criminal Sentencing: An Empirical Assessment of a Conflict Proposition,” 40 American Sociological Review 753.Google Scholar
DILL, Forrest (1980) “Reasons for Felony Dismissals,” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Madison, Wisconsin (June 6).Google Scholar
EISENSTEIN, James and Herbert, JACOB (1977) Felony Justice. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
EMERSON, Robert M. and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1977) “The Micro-Politics of Trouble,” 25 Social Problems 121.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
HALL, Donald (1975) “Role of the Victim in the Prosecution and Disposition of a Criminal Case,” 28 Vanderbilt Law Review 931.Google Scholar
HOLMSTROM, Lynda Lytle and Ann W., BURGESS (1978) The Victim of Rape: Institutional Reactions. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
HOSTICA, Carl J. (1979) “We Don't Care About What Happened, We only Care About What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer Client Negotiations of Reality,” 26 Social Problems 599.Google Scholar
JANOVIC, Ivan (1978) “Social Class and Criminal Sentencing,” 10 Crime and Social Justice 9.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn (1979) Plea Bargaining or Trial? Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
MILLER, Frank (1970) Prosecution: The Decision to Charge a Suspect with a Crime. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
MYERS, Martha A. and John, HAGAN (1979) “Private and Public Trouble: Prosecutors and the Allocation of Court Resources,” 26 Social Problems 439.Google Scholar
NEUBAUER, David (1974) Criminal Justice in Middle America. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
NEWMAN, Donald J. (1966) Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence Without Trial. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
QUINNEY, Richard (1970) The Social Reality of Crime. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
ROSETT, Arthur and Donald R., CRESSEY (1976) Justice by Consent. New York: J.B. Lippincott Company.Google Scholar
STANKO, Elizabeth A. (1977) “These are the Cases that Try Themselves.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
STANKO, Elizabeth A. (1981) “The Arrest Versus the Case,” 9 Urban Life 395.Google Scholar
SWIGERT, Victoria Lynn and Ronald A., FARRELL (1976) Murder, Inequality, and the Law. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
UTZ, Pamela (1978) Settling the Facts. Lexington, Mass: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, Kirsten M. (1976) “The Effects of Victim Characteristics on the Disposition of Violent Crimes,” in MacDonald, William F. (ed.), Criminal Justice and the Victim. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar