Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T01:41:57.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idle Rights: Employees' Rights Consciousness and the Construction of Sexual Harassment Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Anna-Maria Marshall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes women's legal consciousness in responding to unwanted sexual attention in the workplace. By focusing on a particular social problem, this study is situated in the particular legal domain of sexual harassment laws and in a specific organizational context. Taking the perspective of the intended beneficiaries of sexual harassment policies and procedures—women with complaints about sexual conduct in the workplace—I show that the implementation of grievance procedures creates powerful obstacles to women's efforts to assert those rights. Moreover, the practices implementing the policies can alter the very definition of sexual harassment in that setting. Thus, in enacting grievance procedures, women and supervisors construct a legality in particular workplaces that offers only limited protection for women's rights.

Type
Law in the Workplace
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 83 - 121
Copyright
© 2005 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association and at the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program at the University of California, Berkeley. I would especially like to thank Ruth Aguilera, Scott Barclay, Jonathan Casper, Lauren Edelman, Michael Goldman, Bert Kritzer, Zine Magubane, Winnie Poster, Joseph Sanders, Vicki Schultz, Rachel Schurman, Charis Thompson, Sandy Welsh, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that have considerably improved the article.

References

References

Arvey, Richard D., & Cavanaugh, Marcie A. (1995) “Using Surveys to Assess the Prevalence of Sexual Harassment: Some Methodological Problems,” 51 J. of Social Issues 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Anita (1994) “Law, Culture, and Harassment,” 142 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1227–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence (1992) “Prejudice and Alternative Dispute Resolution,” 12 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 147–76.Google Scholar
Brooks, Linda, & Perot, Annette R. (1991) “Reporting Sexual Harassment: Exploring a Predictive Model,” 15 Psychology of Women Q. 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin (1988) The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Caroline C., Frazier, Patricia A., & Olson, Andrea M. (1997) “Predictors of Responses to Unwanted Sexual Attention,” 21 Psychology of Women Q. 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, Barbara (1977) The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, Dunn, Chris, Brown, Pamela, Lee, Helena, & Hubbert, David (1985) “Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution,” Wisconsin Law Review 1359–404.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, & Sutton, John R. (1998) “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resource Management Divisions,” 104 American J. of Sociology 441–76. DOI: 10.1086/210044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401. DOI: 10.1086/229459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., & Lande, John (1993) “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Fuller, Sally Riggs, & Mara-Drita, Iona (2001) “Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law,” 106 American J. of Sociology 1589–641. DOI: 10.1086/321303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, & Erlanger, Howard (1999) “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth,” 105 American J. of Sociology 406–54. DOI: 10.1086/210316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M., & Munger, Frank W. (2003) Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. (2002) Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (198081) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–55.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise F., Shullman, Sandra L., Bailey, Nancy, Richards, Margaret, Swecker, Janice, Gold, Yael, Ormerod, Mimi, & Weitzman, Lauren (1988) “The Incidence and Dimensions of Sexual Harassment in Academia and the Workplace,” 32 J. of Vocational Behavior 152–75. DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(88)90012-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Louise, Swan, Suzanne, & Fischer, Karla (1995) “Why Didn't She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment,” 51 J. of Social Issues 117–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, Gillian (1997) “A Pioneer Program Nurtures a Harassment Free Workplace,” 76 Workforce 38–43.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine (1997) “What's Wrong With Sexual Harassment? 49 Stanford Law Rev. 691–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen B., Green, Eric D., & Sander, Frank E. A. (1986) “ADR Problems and Prospects: Looking to the Future,” 69 Judicature 291–99.Google Scholar
Gruber, James E. (1998) “The Impact of Male Work Environments and Organizational Policies on Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment,” 12 Gender and Society 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, James E., & Smith, Michael D. (1995) “Women's Responses to Sexual Harassment: A Multivariate Analysis,” 17 Basic Applied Social Psychology 543–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutek, Barbara (1985) Sex and the Workplace: The Impact of Sexual Behavior and Harassment on Women, Men and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gutek, Barbara (1992) “Disputes and Dispute-Processing in Organizations,” 12 Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 31–52.Google Scholar
Harkavy, Jonathan R. (1999) “Privatizing Workplace Justice: the Advent of Mediation in Resolving Sexual Harassment Disputes,” 34 Wake Forest Law Rev. 135.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. (1999) “Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 17–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Eve (1990) “Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Feminist Voice,” 5 Ohio State J. on Dispute Resolution 337–79.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Elizabeth (2000) “Expectation, Acceptance, and Agency.” Paper presented at Law and Society Annual Meeting, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
Hull, Kathleen E. (2003) “The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of Legality: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 629–58. DOI: 10.1086/380074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary, & Leonard, Alice (1997) “Sex Discrimination and Alternative Dispute Resolution: British Proposals in the Light of International Experience,” Public Law, (Summer 1997) 298–314.Google Scholar
Jacob, Herbert (1969) Debtors in Court. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kihnley, Jennie (2000) “Unraveling the Ivory Fabric: Institutional Obstacles to the Handling of Sexual Harassment Complaints,” 25 Law and Social Inquiry 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., Vidmar, Neil, & Bogart, W. A. (1991) “To Confront or Not to Confront: Measuring Claiming Rates in Discrimination Grievances,” 25 Law & Society Rev. 875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Kay, & Mellema, Virginia (2001) “Strategizing the Street: How Law Matters in the Lives of Women in the Street-Level Drug Economy,” 26 Law and Social Inquiry 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, Jessica (1982) “Responses to Sexual Harassment on the Job: Legal, Organizational, and Individual Actions,” 38 J. of Social Issues 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loy, Pamela, & Stewart, Lea (1984) “The Extent and Effects of the Sexual Harassment of Working Women,” 17 Sociological Focus 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. (1979) The Sexual Harassment of Working Women. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria (2003) “Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 659–89. DOI: 10.1086/380077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, & Barclay, Scott W. (2003) “In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World,” 28 Law and Social Inquiry 617–28. DOI: 10.1086/380076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1985) “For and Against Settlement: Uses and Abuses of the Mandatory Settlement Conference,” 33 UCLA Law Rev. 485–514.Google Scholar
Merit Systems Protection Board (1995) Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Trends, Progress and Continuing Challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1995) “Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2003) “Rights Talk and the Experience of Law: Implementing Women's Human Rights to Protection from Violence,” 25 Human Rights Q. 343–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezey, Naomi (2001) “Out of the Ordinary: Law, Power, Culture, and the Commonplace,” 26 Law and Social Inquiry 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Phoebe A. (1999) “Risking Relationships: Understanding the Litigation Choices of Sexually Harassed Women,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2000) “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment 34 Law & Society Rev. 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Beth A. (2000) “The Paradox of Complaining: Law, Humor and Harassment in the Everyday Work World,” 25 Law and Social Inquiry 1151–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Jackie, & Henson, Kevin (1997) “‘Hey, Why Don't You Wear a Shorter Skirt?’ Structural Vulnerability and the Organization of Sexual Harassment in Temporary Clerical Employment,” 11 Gender and Society 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. (2000) “Employment Discrimination or Sexual Violence? Defining Sexual Harassment in American and French Law,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 1091–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Kearns, Thomas R. (1995) “Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life,” in Sarat, A. & Kearns, T. R., eds., Law in Everyday Life. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki (1998) “Reconceptualizing Sexual Harassment,” 107 Yale Law J. 1732–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. (1992) “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and Transformation,” 98 American J. of Sociology 1–29. DOI: 10.1086/229967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwyn, David, Heise, Michael, & Eigen, Zev. J. (2001) “Don't Train Your Employees and Cancel Your ‘1-800’ Harassment Hotline: An Empirical Examination and Correction of the Flaws in the Affirmative Defense to Sexual Harassment Charges,” 69 Fordham Law Rev. 1265–304.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R., Dobbin, Frank, Meyer, John W., & Scott, W.Richard (1994) “Legalization of the Workplace,” 99 American J. of Sociology 944–71. DOI: 10.1086/230368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1987) The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1952. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, Sandy (1999) “Gender and Sexual Harassment,” 25 Annual Rev. of Sociology 169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Christine (1997) “Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Critique of Current Research and Policy,” 1 Sexuality and Culture 19–43.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice, & Aniakudo, Patricia (1995) “The Response of African-American Women Firefighters to Gender Harassment at Work,” 32 Sex Roles 125–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemans, Frances K. (1983) “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System,” 77 American Political Science Rev. 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998).Google Scholar
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998).Google Scholar
Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993).Google Scholar
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998).Google Scholar