Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T08:48:35.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“How Do I Bring Diversity?” Race and Class in the College Admissions Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Anna Kirkland  and
Ben B. Hansen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the first systematic study of what college applicants invoke when required to submit a diversity essay, we revisit many settled assumptions on both the left and the right about how such an essay would operate after Grutter and Gratz as well as after the passage of anti–affirmative action ballot initiatives. Our data are a sample of 176 diversity essays submitted to the University of Michigan in the immediate aftermath of the University's Supreme Court win, analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively with special attention to the differences that the essay writer's race and class position make. We find that in many respects the essays are similar when written by applicants from similar backgrounds but different races, and that conservative critics were wrong to assume the essay would function simply as a way of announcing oneself as an under-the-table affirmative action candidate. Rather than suggesting a straightforward lineup of advantage and disadvantage, we suggest rather that the essay is a vehicle for the youngest generation of citizens to both receive and send back a new conception of difference that has some essentializing elements but overall is turning in a postracial, cosmopolitan direction.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 103 - 138
Copyright
© 2011 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank the Office of Undergraduate Admissions at the University of Michigan, the Office of General Counsel, the College Board, ACT Inc., the National Science Foundation (Grant#SES-0753164), the National Center for Institutional Diversity, the Institute for Research on Women and Gender, and the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program for their considerable cooperation in assembling the data for this project and for providing funding. We received very helpful feedback along the way from audiences at the University of Michigan Law School, the Michigan Center for Political Studies Workshop on Democratic Politics, and the University of Connecticut School of Law, and especially from Ellen Berrey, Anthony Chen, Daniel Lipson, and three anonymous reviewers. Jessica Kosteva provided valuable research assistance.

References

References

Bell, Joyce M., & Hartmann, Douglas (2007) “Diversity in Everyday Discourse: The Cultural Ambiguities and Consequences of Happy Talk,” 72 American Sociological Rev. 895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrey, Ellen C. (2009) Inclusion for All: “Diversity” And the Meaning of Racial Equality in Post-Civil Rights America. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen C. (forthcoming) “Why Diversity Became Orthodox in Higher Education, and How It Changed the Meaning of Race on Campus,” Critical Sociology, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bodine, Paul (2006) Great Application Essays for Business School. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boli, John, & Elliott, Michael A. (2008) “Facade Diversity: The Individualization of Cultural Difference,” 23 International Sociology 540–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, David E. (2007) “Sticking Together: Classroom Diversity and Civic Education,” 35 American Politics Research 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbado, Devon W., & Harris, Cheryl I. (2008) “The New Racial Preferences,” 96 California Law Rev. 1139–214.Google Scholar
College Confidential (2008) “College Confidential,” http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-essays/463195-uh-how-do-i-bring-diversity.html?highlight=diversity (accessed 6 Dec. 2010).Google Scholar
Denson, Nida (2009) “Do Curricular and Cocurricular Diversity Activities Influence Racial Bias? A Meta-Analysis,” 79 Rev. of Educational Research 805–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (2005) “The Endogeneity of Law: Civil Rights at Work,” in Nelson, R. L. & Nielsen, L. B., eds., Handbook on Employment Discrimination Research: Rights and Realities. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., et al. (1993) “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Fuller, Sally Riggs, et al. (2001) “Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law,” 106 American J. of Sociology 589–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graglia, Lino A. (2004) “Grutter and Gratz: Race Preference to Increase Racial Representation Held ‘Patently Unconstitutional’ Unless Done Subtly Enough in the Name of Pursuing ‘Diversity,’” 78 Tulane Law Rev. 2037–53.Google Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, Dey, Eric L., et al. (2003) “How Does Racial/Ethnic Diversity Promote Education?” 27 Western J. of Black Studies 20–9.Google Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, Lehman, Jeffrey S., et al. (2004a) Defending Diversity: Affirmative Action at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, Nagda, Biren A., et al. (2004b) “The Benefits of Diversity in Education for Democratic Citizenship,” 60 J. of Social Issues 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Ben B., & Klopfer, Stephanie O. (2006) “Optimal Full Matching and Related Designs Via Network Flows,” 15 J. of Computational and Graphical Statistics 609–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, David (2004) “In Defense of Intellectual Diversity,” The Chronicle of Higher Education B12 (February 13).Google Scholar
Hurtado, Sylvia, et al. (2003) “College Environments, Diversity, and Student Learning,” 18 Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 145–90.Google Scholar
Kalev, Alexandra, et al. (2006) “Best Practices or Best Guesses? Diversity Management and the Remediation of Inequality,” 71 American Sociological Rev. 589–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karabel, Jerome (2005) The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Kelly, Erin, & Dobbin, Frank (1998) “How Affirmative Action Became Diversity Management: Employer Response to Antidiscrimination Law, 1961 to 1996,” 41 American Behavioral Scientist 960–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Anna (2008) Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Stephen, & London, Michael (2006) The New Rules of College Admissions: Ten Former Admissions Officers Reveal What It Takes to Get into College Today. New York: Fireside.Google Scholar
Lipson, Daniel N. (2007) “Embracing Diversity: The Institutionalization of Affirmative Action as Diversity Management at UC-Berkeley, UT-Austin, and UW-Madison,” 32 Law and Social Inquiry 985–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Michael James (2000) How to Write a Winning College Application Essay. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. Eric (2001) Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascarella, Ernest T., et al. (1996) “Influences on Students' Openness to Diversity and Challenge in the First Year of College,” 67 J. of Higher Education 174–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Julie (2003) “New U-M Undergraduate Admissions Process to Involve More Information, Individual Review,” University of Michigan News Service, http://www.umich.edu/news/index.html?Releases/2003/Aug03/admissions (accessed 11 Jan. 2010).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (2007) “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century,” 30 Scandinavian Political Studies 137–74.Google Scholar
Reinisch, June Machover, et al. (1995) “In Utero Exposure to Phenobarbital and Intelligence Deficits in Adult Men,” 274 J. of the American Medical Association 1518–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, Paul R. (1991) “A Characterization of Optimal Designs for Observational Studies,” 53 J. of the Royal Statistical Society 597–610.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R., & Rubin, Donald B. (1983) “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” 70 Biometrika 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Paul R., & Rubin, Donald B. (1985) “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score,” 39 American Statistician 33–8.Google Scholar
Santos, Silvia J., et al. (2007) “The Relationship Between Campus Diversity, Students' Ethnic Identity and College Adjustment: A Qualitative Study,” 13 Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 104–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, Jacques (2003) The Gatekeepers: Inside the Admissions Process of a Premier College. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mitchell L. (2007) Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trzesniewski, Kali, et al. (2008) “Do Today's Young People Really Think They Are So Extraordinary? An Examination of Secular Trends in Narcissism and Self-Enhancement,” 19 Psychological Science 181–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twenge, Jean M. (2006) Generation Me: Why Today's Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled–and More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Peter W. (2003) “Imaginary Friends: How to Write the Diversity Essay,” National Review Online, September, http://old.nationalreview.com/comment/wood200309300825.asp (accessed 6 Dec. 2010).Google Scholar

Statute Cited

Constitution of Michigan, Article 1, § 26 (Michigan Civil Rights Initiative), approved 7 Nov. 2006, eff. 23 Dec. 2006.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Gratz v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 244 (2003).Google Scholar
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).Google Scholar
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).Google Scholar