Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:10:34.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gendered Lawyering: Difference and Dominance in Lawyer-Client Interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Bryna Bogoch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article addresses the debate about the significance of gender differences by analyzing patterns of interaction between lawyers and clients. It examines features of the language of lawyers and clients associated with the dominance and difference paradigms that are at the center of feminist theory. Talk characterized by dominance includes the control of discourse space, interruptions, topic control, and challenges. Features associated with a particular female “voice” include cooperative responses, affiliative requests, indirection, politeness, and the expression of emotion. Results show that women lawyers' talk is role behavior rather than gendered behavior, with little difference between men and women lawyers. Clients' speech is tempered by gender considerations, with both men and women clients expressing greater deference to men lawyers and women clients expressing cooperation and solidarity with all lawyers. It was mainly in reference to the occasional willingness to grant legitimacy to the clients' emotional concerns, as well as the stress on professional identity, that marked women lawyers' specific style of lawyering.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , 1997 , pp. 677 - 712
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

This article is based on research supported by the Ford Foundation and the Israel Foundation Trustees. An earlier version was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association Meeting in Toronto, Canada, 1995. I am grateful to colleagues who attended the session on Women and the Legal Profession I for their helpful comments. I also appreciate the discussions with Brenda Danet, Robert L. Cooper, Malcah Yaeger-Dror, and Shoshana Blum-Kulka at various stages of the project and the suggestions of the anonymous reviewers. Many thanks to Leonard Weller and Dafna Izraeli who read and commented on an initial draft. I also thank Dafna Izraeli for her kindness and support as well as for her original interpretation of some of the results.

References

Abel, Richard L. (1986) “Lawyers,” in Lipson, L. & Wheeeler, S., eds., Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Adelsward, Viveka, Aronsson, Karin, Jonsson, Linda, & Linell, Per (1987) “The Unequal Distribution of Interactional Space: Dominance and Control in Courtroom Interaction,” 7 Text 313–46.Google Scholar
Adler, Nancy J. (1986) “Women in Management Worldwide,” 16 International Studies of Management & Organization 3–33.Google Scholar
Ainsworth-Vaughn, Nancy (1992) “Topic, Power and Gender in Doctor-Patient Discourse.” Presented at the International Conference on Discourse & the Professions, 26–29 Aug., Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira (1989) “Female and Male Stereotypes in Israeli Literature and Media: Evidence from Introductory Patterns,” 9 Language & Communication 43–68.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira, & Giora, Rachel (1992) “Gender versus Group—Relation Analysis of Impositive Speech Acts,” in Hall, K., Bucholtz, M., & Moonwomon, B., eds., Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Vol. 1. Berkeley: Berkeley Women & Language Group, Univ. of California.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. (1970a) How to Do Things with Words. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.-(1970b) Philosophical Papers. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Katharine T. (1991) “Feminist Legal Methods,” in Bartlett & Kennedy, eds. 1991.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Katharine T., & Kennedy, R., eds. (1991) Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Berends, Miek (1984) “A Case of Divorce.” Presented at Workshop on the Study of Interaction between Lawyer and Client, Univ. of Groningen, 24–27 Oct.Google Scholar
Binion, Gayle (1993) “The Nature of Feminist Jurisprudence,” 77 (3) Judicature 140–43.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1983) “The Dynamics of Political Interviews,” 3 Text 131–53.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana-(1990) “You Don't Touch Lettuce with Your Fingers: Parental Politeness in Family Discourse,” 14 J. of Pragmatics 259–88.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Danet, Brenda, & Gerson, Rimona (1985) “The Language of Requesting in Israeli Society,” in Forgas, J. P., ed., Language and Social Situations. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, & House, Juliane (1989) “Cross Cultural and Situational Variation in Requesting Behavior,” in Blum-Kulka, House, & Kasper, eds. 1989.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane, & Kaspers, G., eds. (1989) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bogaers, Iris E. W. M. (1992) “Dealing with Dominance: Some Implications of Verbal Interactions of Women and Men in Dutch Job Interviews.” Presented at International Conference on Discourse & the Professions, 26–29 Aug., Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna (1991) “The Dynamics of Power: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Lawyer-Client Interaction in a Legal Aid Office.” Ph.D. diss., Hebrew Univ.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna (1994) “Power, Distance and Solidarity: Models of Professional-Client Interaction in an Israeli Legal Aid Setting,” 5(1) Discourse & Society 65–88.Google Scholar
Bogoch, Bryna, & Danet, Brenda (1984) “Challenge and Control in Lawyer-Client Interaction: A Case Study in an Israeli Legal Aid Office,” 4 Text 249–75.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universale in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger, & Gilman, Albert (1960) “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity,” in Sebeok, T. A., ed., Style in Language. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Burton, Deidre (1980) Dialogue and Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Modern Drama Dialogue and Naturally Occuring Conversation. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen E. (1979) “The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception,” 7 (3) International J. of the Sociology of Law 331–54.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen E. (1994) “The Symbol Traders,” in Cain, M. E. & Harrington, C. B., eds., Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah (1992) “‘Not Gender Difference but the Difference Gender Makes‘—Explanation on Research on Sex and Language,” 94 International J. of the Sociology of Language 13–26.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona, & O'Leary, Kathy (1989) “Lakoff in Context: The Social and Linguistic Functions of Tag Questions,” in Coates, J. & Cameron, D., eds., Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. (1983) “Language and the Structure of Belief in Medical Communication,” in Fisher & Todd, eds. 1983.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer (1986) Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Corsaro, William A. (1985) “Sociological Approaches to Discourse Analysis,” in Van Dijk, T. A., ed., Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 1: Disciplines of Discourse. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda (1980) “Language in the Legal Process,” 14 Law & Society Rev. 445–564.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda-(1990) “Language and the Law: An Overview of 15 Years of Research,” in Giles, H. & Robinson, W. P., eds., Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Davis, Sue, Haire, Susan, & Songer, Donald R. (1993) “Voting Behavior and Gender on the U.S. Courts of Appeals,” 77 (3) Judicature 129–33.Google Scholar
Dindia, Kathryn (1987) “The Effects of Sex of Subject and Sex of Partner on Interruptions,” 13 Human Communication Research 345–71.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert (1980) “Orchestrated Encounters: An Essay on the Comparative Analysis of Speech Exchange Systems,” 2 Sociology of Health & Illness 151–73.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, & Heritage, John (1992) “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction,” in Drew, P. & Heritage, J., eds., Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole, & Adams, Karen (1990) “Creating Inequality: Breaking the Rules in Debates,” 9 J. of Language & Social Psychology 171–90.Google Scholar
Edmondson, Willis (1981) Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs (1981) Women in Law. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs-(1988) Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976) “Is Sybil There? The Structure of Some American English Directives,” 5 Language in Society 25–66.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan-(1987) “About, to and by Women,” in Brouwer, D. & Haan, D. de, eds., Women's Language, Socialization and Self-image. Providence, RI: Foris.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sue (1984) “Institutional Authority and the Structure of Discourse,” 7 Discourse Processes 201–24.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sue (1991) “A Discourse of the Social: Medical Talk/Power Talk/Oppositional Talk,” 2 (2) Discourse & Society 157–82.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sue, & Groce, Stephen B. (1990) “Accounting Practices in Medical Interviews,” 19 Language in Society 225–50.Google Scholar
Fisher, Sue, & Todd, Alexander Dundas, eds. (1983) The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, Pamela (1978) “Interaction: The Workwomen Do,” 25 Social Problems 397–406.Google Scholar
Fishman, Pamela-(1990) “Conversational Insecurity,” in Cameron, D., ed., The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger, & Kress, Gunther (1979) “Critical Linguistics,” in Fowler, R. et al., eds., Language and Control. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Frankel, Richard M. (1984) “From Sentence to Sequence: Understanding the Medical Encounter through Microinteractional Analysis,” 7 Discourse Processes 135–70.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice F., & Greenwood, Alice (1996) “Women, Men and Type of Talk: What Makes the Difference?” 25 Language in Society 1–26.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1991) “Between Speech and Silence: The Problematics of Research in Language and Gender,” in Leonardo, M. Di, ed., Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Leonardo, M. Di-(1995) “Language, Gender and Power: An Anthropological Review,” in Hall, K. & Bucholtz, M., eds., Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John (1994a) “Introduction: Language Constructing Law,” in Gibbons, ed. 1994b.Google Scholar
Gibbons, John, ed. (1994b) Language and the Law. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1988) “Cooperation and Competition across Girls' Play Activities”, in Todd, A. D. & Fisher, S., eds., Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Graycar, Regina, & Morgan, Jenny (1990) The Hidden Gender of Law. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul (1975) “Logic and Conversation,” in Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L., eds., Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John (1986) “What Do Dutch Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases?” 20 Law & Society Rev. 135–75.Google Scholar
Harris, Angela P. (1991) “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory,” in Bartlett & Kennedy, eds. 1991.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra (1984) “Questions as a Mode of Control in Magistrate's Court,” 49 International J. of the Sociology of Language 5–27.Google Scholar
Hearn, Jeff, & Parkin, P. Wendy (1988) “Women, Men and Leadership: A Critical Review of Assumptions, Practices, and Change in the Industrialized Nations,” in Adler, N.J. & Izraeli, D. N., eds., Women in Managment Worldwide. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Hein, Norbert, & Wodak, Ruth (1987) “Medical Interviews in Internal Medicine: Some Results of an Empirical Investigation,” 7 Text 37–65.Google Scholar
Henley, Nancy, & Kramarae, Cheris (1991) “Gender, Power, and Miscommunication,” in Coupland, N., Giles, H., & Wiemann, J., eds., “Miscommunication” and Problematic Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (1994) “Constituting and Maintaining Activities across Sequences: And-prefacing as a Feature of Question Design,” 23 Language in Society 1–29.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet (1986) “Functions of ‘You Know’ in Women's and Men's Speech,” 15 Language in Society 1–21.Google Scholar
Hosticka, Carl J. (1979) “‘We Don't Care What Happened, We Only Care about What's Going to Happen’: Lawyer-Client Negotiations of Reality,” 5 Social Problems 599–610.Google Scholar
Izraeli, Dafha (1991) “Women and Work: From Collective to Career,” in Swirski, B. & Safir, M., eds., Calling the Equality Bluff: Women in Israel. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Jack, Dana, & Jack, Rand (1994) “Women Lawyers: Archetypes and Alternatives,” in Gilligan, C., ed., Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women's Thinking, to Psychological Theory and Education. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. (1990) “Sexual Difference and Sexual Equality,” in Rhode, ed. 1990b.Google Scholar
James, Deborah, & Clarke, Sandra (1993) “Women, Men and Interruptions: A Critical Review,” in Tannen, ed. 1993b.Google Scholar
James, Deborah, & Drakich, Janice (1993) “Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research,” in Tannen, ed. 1993b.Google Scholar
Johnson, Cathryn (1994) “Gender, Legitimate Authority and Leader-Subordinate Conversations,” 59 American Sociological Rev. 122–35.Google Scholar
Johnson, Terence James (1972) Professions and Power. London: McMillan.Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar (1986) Talking Straight: Dugri Speech in Israeli Sabra Culture. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Kedar, Leah (1988) Power through Discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga (1993) “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensititivity of Preference Structures,” 22 Language in Society 193–216.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris, Schulz, Muriel, & O'Barr, William M. (1984) “Introduction: Toward an Understanding of Language and Power,” in Kramarae, C., Schulz, M., & O'Barr, W. M., eds., Language and Power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Fanshel, David (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin (1975) Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lee, John R. E. (1987) “Prologue: Talking Organisation,” in Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E., eds., Talk and Social Organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Leet-Pellegrini, Helena M. (1980) “Conversational Dominance as a Function of Gender and Expertise,” in Giles, H., Robinson, W. P., & Smith, P. M., eds., Language: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith N. (1990) “The Study of Language in the Judicial Process,” in Levi, J. N. & Walker, A. G., eds., Language in the Judicial Process. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983) Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littleton, Christine A. (1993) “Reconstructing Sexual Equality,” in Smith, P., ed., Feminist Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith (1984) Women Physicians: Careers, Status and Power. New York: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith-(1991) “Dismantling Noah's Ark,” in Lorber, J. & Farrell, S. A., eds., The Social Construction of Gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Farrell, S. A.-(1994) Paradoxes of Gender: Feminist Social Theories. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1990) “Legal Perspectives on Sexual Difference,” in Rhode, ed. 1990b.Google Scholar
Makri-Tsilipakou, Marianthi (1991) “Doing Disagreement: The Case of Gender,” 1 Working Papers on Language, Gender & Sexism 58–87.Google Scholar
Maley, Yon (1994) “The Language of the Law,” in Gibbons, ed. 1994b.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N., & Borker, Ruth A. (1982) “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication,” in Gumperz, J. J., ed., Language and Social Identity. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M. (1993) Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. (1988) “Language, Interaction, and Social Problems,” 35 (4) Social Problems 311–34.Google Scholar
McFarland, Diane (n.d.) “Lawyer-Client Relations in Criminal Cases.” Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Toronto.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh (1987) “Language and Power in Organizational Process,” 10 Discourse Processes 291–301.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1985) “Portia in a Different Voice: Speculations on a Women's Lawyering Process,” 1 Berkeley Women's Law J. 39–63.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie-(1988) “Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies and Legal Education or ‘The Fem-Crits Go to Law School,‘” 38 J. of Legal Education 61–85.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie-(1992) “Change in the Legal Profession,” in Gender Equality: A Challenge for the Legal Profession. Toronto: Canadian Bar Association.Google Scholar
Mishler, Elliot George (1984) The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Molm, Linda D., & Hedley, Mark (1992) “Gender, Power and Social Exchange,” in Ridgeway, ed. 1992.Google Scholar
Morello, Karen Berger (1986) The Invisible Bar: The Woman Lawyer in America, 1638 to the Present. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mumby, Dennis K., & Stohl, Cynthia (1991) “Power and Discourse in Organization Studies: Absence and the Dialectic of Control,” 2 (3) Discourse & Society 313–32.Google Scholar
Mulac, Anthony, & Bradac, James J. (1995) “Women's Style in Problem Solving Interaction: Powerless or Simply Feminine,” in P. J. Kalbfleisch & M. J. Cody, Gender Power and Communication in Human Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen (1985) “Toward a Model of Members' Methods for Recognizing Interruptions,” 14 Language in Society 31–40.Google Scholar
Murray, Stephen (1987) “Power and Solidarity in Interruption: A Critique of the Santa Barbara School Conception and Its Application by Orcutt and Harvey (1985),” 10 Symbolic Interaction 101–110.Google Scholar
Ng, Sik Hung, & Bradac, James J. (1993) Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M. (1982) Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M., & Atkins, Bowman K. (1980) “‘Women's Language’ or ‘Powerless Language‘?” in McConnell-Gainer, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N., eds., Women and Language in Literature and Society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Paget, Marianne A. (1983) “On the Work of Talk: Studies in Misunderstanding”, in Fisher & Todd, eds. 1983.Google Scholar
Raday, Frances (1996) “Women in Law in Israel: A Study of the Relationship between Professional Integration and Feminism,” 12 Georgia State Univ. Law Rev. 525–52.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. (1990a) “Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference,” in Rhode, ed. 1990b.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L., ed. (1990b) Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L., ed. (1992) Gender, Interaction and Inequality. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, Derek, Bull, Peter, & Smith, Sally (1988) “The Development of a Comprehensive System for Classifying Interruptions,” 7 International J. of Language and Social Psychology 27–34.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1994) Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (1973) Lawyers and Their Society: A Comparative Study of the Legal Profession in Germany and in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation,” 50 Language 676–735.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1988) “Law and Social Relations: Vocabularies of Motive in Lawyer/Client Interaction,” 22 Law & Society Review 735–69.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F. (1995) Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scales, Ann C. (1993) “The Emergence of Feminist Jurisprudence: An Essay,” in Smith, P., ed., Feminist Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, Carola (1984) “The Legal Managment of Emotional Issues: Client Control by Divorce Lawyers.” Presented at Workshop on the Study of Interaction between Lawyer and Client, Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen, 24–27 Oct. 1984.Google Scholar
Scudder, Joseph N., & Andrews, Patricia Hayes (1995) “A Comparison of Two Alternative Models of Powerful Speech: The Impact of Power and Gender upon the Use of Threats,” 12 Communication Research Reports 25–33.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1970) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sherry, Suzanna (1986) “Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication,” 72 Virginia Law Rev. 543–616.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. (1986) “Language and the Law,” in 7 Annual Rev. of Applied Linguistics 50–63. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. (1985) Language, the Sexes and Society. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, & Brody, Charles (1989) “Interruptions in Group Discussions: The Effects of Gender and Group Composition,” 54 American Sociological Rev. 424–36.Google Scholar
Smith-Lovin, Lynn, & Robinson, Dawn T. (1992) “Gender and Conversational Dynamics,” in Ridgeway, ed. 1992.Google Scholar
Strong, P. M. (1988) “Minor Courtesies and Macro Structures,” in Drew, P. & Wootton, A., eds., Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. (1981) “New York Jewish Conversational Style,” 30 International J. of the Sociology of Language 133–49.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1984) Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1990) You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1993a) “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance,” in Tannen, ed. 1993b.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, ed. (1993b) Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine (1987) “Introduction to Part II,” in Philips, S. U., Steele, S. & Tanz, C., eds., Language, Gender and Sex in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny A. (1985) “The Language of Power: Towards a Dynamic Pragmatics,” 9 J. of Pragmatics 765–83.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexandra Dundas (1989) Intimate Adversaries: Cultural Conflicts between Doctors and Women Patients. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Ole (1992) “Is There a Separate Women's Language?” 94 International J. of the Sociology of Language 63–73.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1988) “Social Cognition, Social Power and Social Discourse,” 8 Text 129–57.Google Scholar
Walker, Ann Graffam (1985) “The Two Faces of Silence: The Effect of Witness Hesitancy on Lawyers' Impressions,” in Tannen, D. & Saville-Troike, M., eds., Perspectives on Silence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1988) “Linguistic Manipulation, Power and the Legal Setting,” in Kedar, ed. 1988.Google Scholar
Weisman, Carol S. & Teitelbaum, Martha Ann (1985) “Physician Gender and the Physician-Patient Relationship: Recent Evidence and Relevant Questions,” 20 J. of Social Science & Medicine 1119–27.Google Scholar
West, Candace (1984) “When the Doctor Is a ‘Lady’: Power, Status and Gender in Physician-Patient Encounters,” 7 Symbolic Interaction 87–106.Google Scholar
West, Candace-(1990) “Not Just ‘Doctors’ Orders': Directive-Response Sequences in Patients' Visits to Women and Men Physicians,” 1 Discourse and Society 85–112.Google Scholar
Winter, Joanne (1992) “The Meaning and Pragmatics of Difference,” 2 (1) Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism 99–115.Google Scholar
Worrall, Anne (1987) “Sisters in Law? Women Defendants and Women Magistrates,” in Carlen, P. & Worrall, A., eds., Gender Crime and Justice. Philadelphia: Open Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M., & Sister, E. (1987) “‘Scuse me, Waitaminute’: Directive Use in Israeli Hebrew,” 25 Linguistics 1127–63.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H., & West, Candace (1975) “Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation,” in Thorne, B. & Henley, N., eds., Language and Sex: Differences and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar