Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:11:35.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The convergence of the articles in this issue is the happy product of independent research upon two problems of widespread concern. Warren and Hiday examine civil commitment of the mentally ill in very different jurisdictions: urban California and rural North Carolina. Yet as Monahan suggests, in his synthetic overview, their data and analysis tend to point in similar directions. Steele surveys the literature on dispute processes and indicates how Hannigan, on the one hand, and Best and Andreasen, on the other, pursue complementary approaches to the study of consumer grievances and remedies. The present format has two advantages: the individual scholar retains the choice of topic and method, but research is still cumulative. I hope to encounter like conjunctions in the future.

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 The Law and Society Association

References

HART, Henry M. Jr., and SACKS, Albert M. (1958) The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Law School (tentative edition).Google Scholar
HOLLINGSHEAD, A.B. and REDLICH, F. (1958) Social Class and Mental Illness. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar