Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:39:24.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

For What It's Worth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Steven L. Winter
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Usually, one thinks of nostalgia as the characteristic vice of the conservative. When Republicans bandy slogans like “family values,” progressives are quick to recognize the dangerous sentimentality that yearns for a status quo ante in which men were men and women were women and minorities were seldom seen and never heard—the age, as Ronald Reagan so callously put it, “back before we knew we had a race problem.” In contrast, one thinks of Utopian romanticism as the characteristic weakness of the progressive. The radical's longing for revolutionary change is seen by conservatives as the dangerously naive and quixotic yearning for human perfection in a flawed and tragic world.

Type
Comments on Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , 1992 , pp. 789 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

I am grateful to Bruce Ackerman, Tony Alfieri, Mike Fischl, Mark Johnson, George Lakoff, Jeremy Paul, Pierre Schlag, Steve Schnably, and Jonathan Simon for helpful comments and suggestions—which I did not always listen to.

References

References

Baker, Russell (1991) “Hear America Listening,” New York Times, 2 Nov. 1991, p. 23, col. 6.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. (1992) “What Is a Postmodern Constitutionalism?” 90 Michigan Law Rev. 1966.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1990) Revenge of the Crystal: Selected Writings on the Modern Object and Its Destiny, 1968–1983, ed. Foss, P. & Pefanis, J.. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, James (1991) “Is Subjectivity Possible? The Postmodern Subject in Legal Theory,” 62 Univ. of Colorado Law Rev. 489.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla (1992) The Philosophy of the Limit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. (1983) “The Supreme Court 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harvard Law Rev. 4.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1978) “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences,” in Writing and Difference, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1981) Dissemination, trans. Johnson, B.. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. (1982) “Tympan,” in Margins of Philosophy, trans. A. Bass. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. (1986) Glas, trans. Leavey, J. P. Jr., & Rand, R.. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rand, R. (1988) Limited Inc, trans. Weber, S.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Jan G. (1968) “Neutrality, Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court: Some Intersections between Law and Political Science,” 20 Stanford Law Rev. 169.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L., & Rabinow, Paul (1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. 2d ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1989) Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77, ed. Gordon, C.. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (1983a) “The Subject and Power,” in Dreyfus & Rabinow 1983.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. (1983b) “On the Genealogy of Ethics: An Overview of a Work in Progress,” in Dreyfus & Rabinow 1983.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (1992a) “Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 697.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (1992b) “A Reply,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 819.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Mardi J. (1991) “Person Schemas,” in Horowitz, M., ed., Person Schemas and Maladaptive Interpersonal Patterns. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jaff, Jennifer (1991) “Against the Flow,” 6 Wisconsin Women's Law J. 119.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark (1987) The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2d ed. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2d ed. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, C.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1964) Signs, trans. McCleary, R.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967) On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. Kaufmann, W.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Post, Robert (1991) “The Relatively Autonomous Discourse of Law,” in Post, R., ed., Law and the Order of Culture. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, R. (1992) “Postmodern Temptations” (Book Review), 4 Yale J. of Law & Humanities 391.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1984) 1 Time and Narrative, trans. McLaughlin, K. & Pellauer, D.. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David (1975) “Notes on a Schema for Stories,” in Bobrow, D. G. & Collins, A. M., eds., Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C., & Abelson, Robert P. (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1989a) “Contradiction and Denial,” 87 Michigan Law Rev. 1216.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1989b) “Missing Pieces: A Cognitive Approach to Law,” 67 Texas Law Rev. 1195.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1990a) “Normative and Nowhere to Go,” 43 Stanford Law Rev. 167.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1990b) “‘Le Hors de Texte, C'est Moi‘—The Politics of Form and the Domestication of Deconstruction,” 11 Cardozo Law Rev. 1631.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1991a) “The Problem of the Subject,” 69 Texas Law Rev. 1627.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre (1991b) “Normativity and the Politics of Form,” 139 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 801.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1992) “‘In Another Kind of Wood’: Michel Foucault and Sociolegal Studies,” 17 Law & Social Inquiry 49.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. (1983) “Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles,” 96 Harvard Law Rev. 781.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. (1988) Red, White and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. (1992) “The Left Critique of Normativity: A Comment,” 90 Michigan Law Rev. 2325.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1989) “Transcendental Nonsense, Metaphoric Reasoning, and the Cognitive Stakes for Law,” 137 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1105.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1990a) “Indeterminacy and Incommensurability in Constitutional Law,” 78 California Law Rev. 1443.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1990b) Bull Durham and the Uses of Theory,“ 42 Stanford Law Rev. 639.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1991a) Foreword: “On Building Houses,” 69 Texas Law Rev. 1595.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1991b) “Without Privilege,” 139 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1063.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1991c) “Contingency and Community in Normative Practice,” 139 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 963.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (1992).Google Scholar