Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:25:43.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“For Her Own Protection . . .”: Conditions of Incarceration for Female Juvenile Offenders in the State of Connecticut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Kristine Olson Rogers
Kristine Olson Rogers*
Affiliation:
Yale Law School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Connecticut presents a perfect case study of differential correctional treatment for young male and female offenders. The state controls two juvenile correctional institutions: the Long Lane School (LLS) in Middletown for girls and the Connecticut School for Boys (CSB) in Meriden. Both facilities have existed practically side-by-side for over a century under state management, yet they have evolved in markedly different ways. The boys' school has been in the throes of constant turmoil and consequently under severe public scrutiny throughout most of its operation. The administrators of the “farm for girls,” on the other hand, have run a very tight ship and take pride in their undisrupted tradition. As a result, the Connecticut School for Boys has bungled its way (albeit ineptly) into the twentieth century while the Long Lane School still prepares women to re-enter the community as nineteenth century domestics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Winter 1972 , pp. 223 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

AUTHOR'S NOTE: Special acknowledgments must go to the Connecticut Department of Children and Youth Services, former Commissioner Wayne R. Mucci and current Commissioner Frank H. Moloney for cooperation and information and to Barbara Bowman, former Director of the Legal Aid Agency of the District of Columbia, now on the law faculty at Stanford University, who taught a course at Yale Law School, Spring, 1971, on Women and the Law, for inspiration.

References

AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION (1970) Consultant's Report: Institutional Care of Connecticut's Delinquent Children. Washington, D.C.: LEAA.Google Scholar
CHILDREN'S BUREAU (1960–71) Statistics on Public Institutions for Delinquent Children. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
ELDEFONSO, Edward (1967) Law Enforcement and the Youthful Offender: Juvenile Procedures. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
FINE, R. H. and J. J., FISHMAN (1968) “Institutionalized Girl Delinquents,” 29 Diseases of the Nervous System 17.Google Scholar
GOLD, Sarah (1970) “Equal Protection for Juvenile Girls in Need of Supervision in New York State,” (Unpublished paper) New York University School of Law.Google Scholar
LONG LANE SCHOOL (1970) Program for Treatment at Long Lane School. Middletown, Connecticut: Long Lane School.Google Scholar
MICHLIN, Linda (1970) Long Lane Report. Long Lane Report: Yale Psycho-Educational Clinic.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF JUVENILE DELINQUENTS AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT (1970) Statistical Series 96. Statistical Series 96: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar