Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:53:42.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Criminal Justice Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Jonathan D. Casper  and
David Brereton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Research on the implementation of criminal justice reforms, such as sentence guidelines, determinate sentence laws, and no plea bargaining policies, has proliferated in recent years. This research raises a variety of concerns about how one should evaluate the effectiveness of policy innovations. We deal here with recurring issues in the evaluation of criminal justice innovations, including the problem of specifying goals against which to measure “effectiveness,” the need to interpret research findings in light of theories about how criminal courts operate, and the importance of choosing appropriate time periods in which to conduct implementation or evaluation studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 1984 , pp. 121 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

*

For helping us to think about these issues and for suggesting several of the ideas argued here, we are indebted to Kennette Benedict. Milton Heumann, Michael Gottfredson, and Peter Nardulli provided helpful criticisms of previous drafts. Richard Lempert made valuable substantive and editorial contributions. The research was supported by the National Institute of Justice (79-NI-AX-0042). All responsibility for the arguments and conclusions rests with the authors.

References

ARNOLD, Thurman W. (1935) The Symbols of Government. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
BARDACH, Eugene (1977) The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
BEHA, James A. (1977) “And Nobody Can Get You Out,” 57 Boston University Law Review 96 (Part I), 289 (Part II).Google Scholar
CASPER, Jonathan D., David, BRERETON and David, NEAL (1982) The Implementation of the California Determinate Sentencing Law. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
CHURCH, Thomas W. Jr. (1976) “Plea-Bargains, Concessions, and the Courts: Analysis of a Quasi-Experiment,” 10 Law & Society Review 377.Google Scholar
COHEN, Jacqueline and Michael, TONRY (1983) “Sentencing Reforms and their Impacts,” in Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S.E. and Tonry, M.H. (eds.), Research on Sentencing, Vol. II. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
COOK, Thomas D. and Donald T., CAMPBELL (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
EDELMAN, Murray (1964) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton (1978) Plea-Bargaining: The Experience of Prosecutors, Judges and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEUMANN, Milton and Colin, LOFTIN (1979) “Mandatory Sentencing and the Abolition of Plea-Bargaining: The Michigan Felony Firearms Statute,” 13 Law & Society Review 393.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael, Michael, GOTTFREDSON and Timothy, FLANAGAN (eds.) (1980) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
JOINT COMMITTEE ON NEW YORK DRUG LAW EVALUATION (1977) The Nation's Toughest Drug Law: Evaluating the New York Experience. New York: Association of the Bar of the City of New York.Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1966) “Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study,” 1 Law & Society Review 111.Google Scholar
LOFTIN, Colin, Milton, HEUMANN and McDOWALL, David (1983) “Mandatory Sentencing and Firearms Violence: Evaluating an Alternative to Gun Control,” 17 Law & Society Review 287.Google Scholar
MARTIN, Susan (1983) “The Politics of Sentencing Reform,” in Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S.E. and Tonry, M.H. (eds.), Research on Sentencing, Vol. II. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
MARTINSON, Robert (1974) “What Works? — Questions and Answers about Prison Reform,” 35 Public Interest 22.Google Scholar
MATHER, Lynn M. (1979) Plea-Bargaining or Trial? The Process of Criminal Case Disposition. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
MAZMANIAN, Daniel A. and Paul A., SABATIER (eds.) (1981) Effective Policy Implementation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
MEDALIE, Richard J., Leonard, ZEITZ and Paul, ALEXANDER (1968) “Custodial Police Interrogation in Our Nation's Capital: The Attempt to Implement Miranda,” 66 Michigan Law Review 1347.Google Scholar
MUIR, William K. (1973) Law and Attitude Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MURPHY, Jerome T. (1971) “Title I of ESEA; The Politics of Implementing Federal Educational Reform,” 41 Harvard Educational Review 35.Google Scholar
NAKAMURA, Robert T. and Frank, SMALLWOOD (1980) The Politics of Policy Implementation. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
OAKS, Dallin H. (1970) “Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure,” 37 University of Chicago Law Review 665.Google Scholar
PELTASON, Jack W. (1961) Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
PIERCE, Glenn L. and William J., BOWERS (1981) “The Bartley-Fox Law's Short-Term Impact on Crime in Boston,” 455 Annals 120.Google Scholar
PRESSMAN, Jeffrey L. and Aaron, WILDAVSKY (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
ROSS, H. Laurence (1981) Deterrence of the Drinking Driver: An International Survey. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Technical Report DOT HS-805 820.Google Scholar
RUBINSTEIN, Michael L. and Teresa J., WHITE (1979) “Alaska's Ban on Plea Bargaining,” 13 Law & Society Review 367.Google Scholar
VAN METER, Donald S. and VAN HORN, Carl E. (1975) “The Policy Implementation Process: A Conceptual Framework,” 6 Administration and Society 445.Google Scholar
WALD, Michael (1967) “Interrogations in New Haven: The Impact of Miranda,” 76 Yale Law Journal 1519.Google Scholar