Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:38:02.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Participants' Ethnicity and Gender on Monetary Outcomes in Mediated and Adjudicated Civil Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Researchers and policymakers have long been concerned about the extent to which such sociocultural factors as ethnicity and gender determine access to organizational rewards and constraints within legal systems. Scholars have also wondered whether less formal processes, such as those found in alternative dispute resolution, are especially susceptible to bias. To test these arguments, we studied the impact of disputants' ethnicity and gender on monetary outcomes in 312 adjudicated and 154 mediated small claims civil cases in Bernalillo County (Albuquerque), New Mexico, in 1990–91. Multivariate analysis including case characteristics showed that much of the effect of disputants' ethnicity and gender on outcomes—especially in courtroom hearings—was accounted for by the kinds of cases in which women and minorities were involved. Controlling for case characteristics eliminated ethnic and gender differences in adjudication, but some ethnic differences remained in mediated case outcomes. Specifically, cases including at least one Anglo mediator resulted in higher monetary outcomes for Anglo claimants, and minority female claimants received lower monetary outcomes in mediated cases in which both mediators were women.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

Michele Hermann and Mary Beth West were the co-principal investigators for the original project on which this research is based and were primary contributors to both data collection efforts and the preparation of the final report (Hermann, LaFree, Rack and West 1992). The research was supported by Grant #G4-90-35 from the Fund for Research in Dispute Resolution (now handled by the National Institute for Dispute Resolution). We would like to thank the Mediation Alliance, the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court, the New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center and the Institute of Public Law for cooperation and support. We would also like to thank Edward Gilliland, Keiko Nakao, Ray Liedka, and several anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.

References

Abalos, David T. (1986) Latinos in the United States: The Sacred and the Political. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1974) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Rev. 217.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., ed. (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice: An American Experience. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. (1983) Justice without Law? New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1989) Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M., & Wilken, Paul H. (1979) Intergroup Processes: A Micro-Macro Perspective. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Edward (1987) “Questioning the Quality of Alternative Dispute Resolution,” 62 Tulane Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Bryan, Penelope E. (1992) “Killing Us Softly: Divorce Mediation and the Politics of Power,” 40 Buffalo Law Rev. 441.Google Scholar
Buldoc, D. S. (1990) “Mediator Style Perspectives: An Innovative Look at Mediator Behavior.” Unpub. Master's thesis, Arizona State Univ.Google Scholar
Burton, John (1990). Conflict: Resolution and Prevention. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bush, Robert A. Baruch, & Folger, Joseph P. (1994) The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Carnevale, Peter J. D., Conlon, Donald E., Hanisch, Kathy A., & Harris, Karen L. (1989) “Experimental Research on the Strategic-Choice Model of Mediation,” in Kressel & Pruitt 1989.Google Scholar
Chambliss, William J., and Seidman, Robert (1982) Law, Order and Power. 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth (1989) “Administrative Prosecutorial Indiscretion,” 63 Tulane Law Rev. 877.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1975) Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Damaska, Mirjan (1975) “Presentation of Evidence and Factfinding Precision,” 123 Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1083.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, Dunn, Chris, Brown, Pamela, Lee, Helena, & Hubbert, David (1985) “Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution,” 6 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1359.Google Scholar
Duryea, Michelle LeBaron (1992) Conflict and Culture: A Literature Review and Bibliography. Victoria, BC: Institute for Dispute Resolution, Univ. of Victoria.Google Scholar
Edwards, Harry T. (1986) “Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema?” 99 Harvard Law Rev. 668.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen (1984) “Against Settlement,” 93 Yale Law J. 1073.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Ruth (1993) White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon (1971) “Mediation: Its Form and Functions,” 44 Southern California Law Rev. 305.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Stephen, Sander, Frank, & Rogers, Nancy, eds. (1992) Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Grillo, Trina (1991) “The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women,” 100 Yale Law J. 1545.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine (1985) Shadow Justice: The Ideology and Institutionalization of Alternatives to Court. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine, & Merry, Sally Engle (1988) “Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 709.Google Scholar
Hermann, Michele, LaFree, Gary, Rack, Christine, & West, Mary Beth (1992) The MetroCourt Project Final Report. Washington: National Institute for Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
Hofrichter, Richard (1982) “Neighborhood Justice and the Social Control Problems of American Capitalism: A Perspective,” in Abel 1982:v. 1.Google Scholar
Kairys, David, ed. (1982) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Keefe, Susan E., & Padilla, Amando M. (1987) Chicano Ethnicity. Albuquerque, NM: Univ. of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris, Schulz, Muriel, & O'Barr, William, eds. (1984) Language and Power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kressel, Kenneth, & Pruitt, Dean G., eds. (1989) Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
LaFree, Gary (1985) “Adversarial and Nonadversarial Justice: A Comparison of Guilty Pleas and Trials,” 23 Criminology 289.Google Scholar
Lazerson, Mark H. (1982) “In the Halls of Justice, the Only Justice is in the Halls,” in R. Abel 1982:v. 1.Google Scholar
Lefcourt, Carol (1984) “Women, Mediation and Family Law,” 18 Clearinghouse Rev. 266.Google Scholar
Leitch, M. Laurie (1986/87) “The Politics of Compromise: A Feminist Perspective on Mediation,” 14/15 Mediation Q. 163.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard, & Monsma, Karl (1994) “Cultural Differences and Discrimination: Samoans before a Public Housing Eviction Board,” 59 American Sociological Rev. 890.Google Scholar
Leung, Kwok (1987) “Some Determinants of Reactions to Procedural Models for Conflict Resolution: A Cross-national Study,” 53 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 898.Google Scholar
Leung, Kwok, & Bond, Michael H. (1990) “Effects of Cultural Femininity on Preference for Methods of Conflict Processing: A Cross-cultural Study,” 26 J. of Experimental Social Psychology 373.Google Scholar
Leung, Kwok, & Lind, E. Allan (1986) “Procedural Justice and Culture: Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences,” 50 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 1134.Google Scholar
Mann, Coramae Richey (1995) “The Contribution of Institutionalized Racism to Minority Crime,” in Hawkins, D. F., ed., Ethnicity, Race and Crime: Perspectives across Time and Place. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A. (1991) “Pursuing Problem-solving or Predictive Settlement,” 19 Florida State Univ. Law Rev. 77.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., & Maiman, Richard J. (1981) “Small Claims Mediation in Maine: An Empirical Assessment,” 33 Maine Law Rev. 237.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., & Maiman, Richard J. (1984) “Mediation in Small Claims Court: Achieving Compliance through Consent,” 18 Law & Society Rev. 11.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., & Maiman, Richard J. (1989) “Mediation in Small Claims Court: Consensual Processes and Outcomes,” in Kressel & Pruitt 1989.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1989) “Mediation in Nonindustrial Societies,” in Kressel & Pruitt 1989.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Raymond J., & Bohlander, Edward W. (1976) “Repression and Criminal Justice in Capitalist America,” 46 Sociological Injury 95.Google Scholar
Mirandé, Alfredo (1985) The Chicano Experience: An Alternative Perspective. Notre Dame, IN: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, ed. (1969) Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, ed. (1990) Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Eleanor Holmes (1989) “Bargaining and the Ethic of Process,” 64 New York Univ. Law Rev. 493.Google Scholar
Pearson, Jessica, & Theonnes, Nancy (1989) “Divorce Mediation: Reflections on a Decade of Research,” in Kressel & Pruitt 1989.Google Scholar
Rack, Christine, Barnes-Anderson, Susan, & Margolin, Sally (1996) “Latino Disadvantage: The Linkage of Structural and Cultural Effects in Small Claims Disputes.” Presented at Pacific Sociological Association annual meetings, Seattle.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Janet (1989) “Mediation in the Justice System: A Paradox for Women,” 1 Women & Criminal Justice 41.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (1987) “Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption,” 93 American J. of Sociology 348.Google Scholar
Thibaut, John, Walker, Laurens, & Lind, E. Allan (1972) “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal Decisionmaking,” 86 Harvard Law Rev. 386.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella (1988) “Intercultural Conflict Styles: A Face-Negotiation Theory,” in Kim, Young Yun & Gudykunst, William B., eds., Theories in Intercultural Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Triandis, Harry C., Bontempo, Robert, Villareal, Marcelo J., Asai, Masaaki, & Lucca, Nydia (1988) “Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships,” 54 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 323.Google Scholar
Unnever, James D. (1982) “Direct and Organizational Discrimination in the Sentencing of Drug Offenders,” 30 Social Problems 212.Google Scholar
Van Koppen, Peter J., & Maisch, Marijke (1991) “Defendants and One-Shotters Win after All: Compliance with Court Decisions in Civil Cases,” 25 Law & Society Rev. 803.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil (1984) “The Small Claims Court: A Reconceptualization of Disputes and an Empirical Investigation,” 18 Law & Society Rev. 515.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil (1987) “Assessing the Effects of Case Characteristics and Settlement Forum on Dispute Outcomes and Compliance,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 155.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wigmore, John Henry (1940) Evidence in Trials at Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Wrong, Dennis H. (1988) Power: Its Forms, Bases and Uses. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar