Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T10:29:36.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Rankings Matter? The Effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on the Admissions Process of Law Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Michael Sauder  and
Ryon Lancaster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a tremendous proliferation of quantitative evaluative social measures in the field of law as well as society generally. One of these measures, the U.S. News & World Report rankings of law schools, has become an almost obsessive concern of the law school community, generating a great deal of speculation about the effects of these rankings on legal education. However, there has been no attempt to systematically ascertain what, if any, effects these rankings have on the decisionmaking of students and schools in the admission process. This article documents some of these effects by conceptualizing rankings as a signal of law school quality, investigating (1) whether students and schools use this signal to make decisions about where to apply and whom to admit, and (2) whether the creation of this signal distorts the phenomenon—law school quality—that it purports to measure. Using data for U.S. law schools from 1996 to 2003, we find that schools' rankings have significant effects on both the decisions of prospective students and the decisions schools make in the admissions process. In addition, we present evidence that the rankings can become a self-fulfilling prophecy for some schools, as the effects of rank described above alter the profile of their student bodies, affecting their future rank. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that the rankings help create rather than simply reflect differences among law schools through the magnification of the small, and statistically random, distinctions produced by the measurement apparatus.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 105 - 134
Copyright
© 2006 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This article was originally presented at the 2003 annual meeting of the Law and Society Association and received the 2004 ASA Sociology of Law Section Award for best graduate student paper. We thank Steve Demuth, Wendy Espeland, Gary Gephart, Robert Nelson, James Oldroyd, and Arthur Stinchcombe for their insightful comments on previous drafts; we also thank the anonymous reviewers at LSR and Herbert M. Kritzer for their suggestions and guidance. The research for this article was supported by funding from the Law School Admissions Council (LSAC). The opinions and conclusions contained in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the LSAC.

References

Benjamin, Beth A., & Podolny, Joel M. (1999) “Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry,” 44 Administrative Science Q. 563–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Mitchell (2001) “Why the U.S. News and World Report Law School Rankings Are Both Useful and Important,” 51 J. of Legal Education 487–502.Google Scholar
Boulding, William, & Kirmani, Amna (1993) “A Consumer-Side Experimental Examination of Signaling Theory: Do Consumers Perceive Warranties as Signals of Quality?,” 20 J. of Consumer Research 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, Paul L., & Gely, Rafael (2004) “What Law Schools Can Learn from Billy Beane and the Oakland Athletics,” 82 Texas Law Rev. 1483–554.Google Scholar
Elsbach, Kimberly D., & Kramer, Roderick M. (1996) “Members' Responses to Organizational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings,” 41 Administrative Science Q. 442–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson (1998) The Struggle for Water: Politics, Identity and Rationality in the American Southwest. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, & Sauder, Michael (2004) “Quantitative Authority and the Reflexivity of Rankings.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Chicago, IL (3–7 June).Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, & Stevens, Mitchell (1998) “Commensuration as a Social Process,” 24 Annual Rev. of Sociology 312–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William H. (2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Pauline M. (1990) “Bonding and Nonbonding Signals of Product Quality,” 63 J. of Business 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Stephen, & Hamilton, Laura (1998) “The Validity of the U.S. News and World Report Rankings of the ABA Law Schools,” Study commissioned by the American Association of Law Schools, http://www.aals.org/validity.html (accessed 4 November 2005).Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell (1998) “In Praise of Law School Rankings: Solutions to Coordination and Collective Action Problems,” 77 Texas Law Rev. 403–28.Google Scholar
Law School Admissions Council (with the American Bar Association, Association of American Law Schools) (1996–2003) The Official Guide to ABA-Approved U.S. Law Schools. Eds. W. Margolis, et al.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard (2002) “Pseudo Science as News: Ranking the Nation's Law Schools,” Paper presented at American Association of Law Schools, New Orleans, LA (3–5 Jan.).Google Scholar
McDonough, Patricia, et al. (1997) “College Rankings: Who Uses Them and With What Impact,” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, March.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul, & Roberts, John (1986) “Price and Advertising Signals of New Product Quality,” 94 J. of Political Economy 796–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, James, & Ehrenberg, Ronald G. (1999) “The Impact of U.S. News and World Report College Rankings on Admissions Outcomes and Pricing Policies at Selective Private Institutions,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper # 7227.Google Scholar
Nelson, Phillip (1970) “Information and Consumer Behavior,” 78 J. of Political Economy 311–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podolny, Joel M. (1993) “A Status-Based Model of Market Competition,” 98 American J. of Sociology 829–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. (1995) Trust in Numbers. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sauder, Michael, & Espeland, Wendy Nelson (2005) “Strength in Numbers? The Advantages of Multiple Rankings,” Paper presented at the Next Generation of Law School Rankings Symposium. Indiana University School of Law (15 April).Google Scholar
Schmalbeck, Richard (2001) “The Durability of Law School Reputation,” 48 J. of Legal Education 568–90.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael (1974) Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stabile, Tom (2000) “How to Beat U.S. News,” 10 National Jurist 19.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian, & Lancaster, Ryon (2004) “Embeddedness and Price Formation in Corporate Law Markets,” 69 American Sociological Rev. 319–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, Dale (2002) “Doing the Right Thing,” The Newsletter of the Association of American Law Schools 1–4 (April).Google Scholar