Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T19:15:12.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Countering Punitiveness: Understanding Stability in Canada's Imprisonment Rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Anthony N. Doob  and
Cheryl Marie Webster
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Canada's imprisonment rate has not changed appreciably since 1960. This stability contrasts with the increased imprisonment rates experienced by Canada's most obvious comparators—the United States and England and Wales. We examine this divergence and propose several interrelated explanations for Canada's anomalous pattern. While Canada is shown not to be immune to pressure for harsher practices and policies, it has been able to counter or balance these trends with other more moderating forces. In particular, we suggest that Canadians have largely been able to escape several of the wider forces or “risk factors” at the root of higher incarceration in other countries. Further, we suggest that certain protective factors of a historical, cultural, and structural nature can also be identified that have limited the extent to which Canada has adopted the same punitive policies documented in the United States and England and Wales.

Type
Two Perspectives on Punishment
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 325 - 368
Copyright
© 2006 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The writing of this article was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant.

References

References

Adams, Michael (2003) Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada, and the Myth of Converging Values. Toronto: Penguin Canada.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew (2000) Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 3d ed. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew (2001) “The Decline of English Sentencing and Other Stories,” in Tonry, M. & Frase, R. S., eds., Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2004) “Australian Crime: Facts and Figures 2004,” Figure 95 (and accompanying text). http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2004/fig095.html (accessed 29 April 2005).Google Scholar
Beckett, Katherine (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Besserer, Sandra, & Trainor, Catherine (2000) “Criminal Victimization in Canada, 1999.” Vol. 20, No. 10 of Juristat. Catalogue no 85-002-XPE. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, & Beck, Allen J. (1999) “Population Growth in U.S. Prisons, 1980–1996,” in Tonry, M. & Petersilia, J., eds., Prisons. Vol. 26 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, & Cohen, Jacqueline (1973) “A Theory of the Stability of Punishment,” 64 The J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, et al. (1977) “The Dynamics of a Homeostatic Punishment Process,” 67 The J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 317–34.Google Scholar
Boritch, Helen (1997) Fallen Women: Female Crime and Criminal Justice in Canada. Toronto: Nelson.Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony, & Dignan, James (2004) “Youth Justice in Great Britain,” in Tonry, M. & Doob, A. N., eds., Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives. Vol. 31 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (1996) Canadian Crime Statistics, 1995. Catalogue no. 85-205-XPE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (1997) Adult Correctional Services in Canada, 1995–1996. Catalogue no. 85-211-XPB. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (1999) Youth Court Statistics, Catalogue no. 85-522-XPB. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (2004) Adult Correctional Services in Canada, 2002–2003. Catalogue no. 85-211-XIE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Committee on Corrections (1969) Toward Unity: The Report of the Canadian Committee on Corrections. Ottawa: Queen's Printer.Google Scholar
Canadian Sentencing Commission (1987) Sentencing Reform: A Canadian Approach. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.Google Scholar
Cauchon, , The Honourable Martin (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada) (2002) Notes for an Address before The Canadian Bar Association, London, Ontario, August 12, 2002.Google Scholar
Cesaroni, Carla, & Doob, Anthony N. (2003) “The Ddecline in Support for Penal Welfarism: Evidence of Support Among the Elite for Punitive Segregation,” 43 British J. of Criminology 434–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correctional Service of Canada (2002) Briefing Book. October 2002. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar
Corrections Population Growth: Report for Federal/Provincial/Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice (1996). Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General.Google Scholar
Daubney, David (M. P.) Chairman (1988) Taking Responsibility: Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Solicitor General on its Review of Sentencing, Conditional Release and Related Aspects of Corrections. Ottawa: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Dauvergne, Mia (2004) “Homicide in Canada, 2003.” Vol. 24, No. 8 of Juristat. Catalogue no. 85-002-XPE. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony N. (1995) “The United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines: If you don't know where you are going, you may not get there,” in Clarkson, C. & Morgan, R., eds., The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony N. (2000) “Transforming the Punishment Environment: Understanding Public Views of What should Be Accomplished at Sentencing,” 42 Canadian J. of Criminology 323–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, Anthony N., & Cesaroni, Carla (2004) Responding to Youth Crime in Canada. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony N., & Sprott, Jane B. (2004) “Changing Models of Youth Justice in Canada,” in Tonry, M. & Doob, A. N., eds., Youth Crime and Youth Justice: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives, Vol. 31 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Doob, Anthony N., & Webster, Cheryl Marie (2003) “Looking at the Model Penal Code Sentencing Provisions through Canadian Lenses,” 7 Buffalo Criminal Law Rev. 139–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doob, Anthony N., et al. (1998) An exploration of Ontario residents' views of crime and the criminal justice system. Toronto: Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Friedland, Martin L. (1995) A Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Judicial Council.Google Scholar
Friedland, Martin L. (2004) “Criminal Justice in Canada Revisited,” 48 Criminal Law Q. 419–73.Google Scholar
Garland, David (2000) “The Culture of High Crime Societies: Some Preconditions of Recent ‘Law and Order’ Policies,” 40 British J. of Criminology 347–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Rosemary (2004) “Trends in Crime and Criminal Punishment in Canada and the United States in the Post-Charter Period.” Presented at The Reddin Symposium XVII, The Canadian Studies Center, Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Gartner, Rosemary, & Doob, Anthony N. (1994) “Trends in Criminal Victimization: 1988–1993,” Vol. 14, No. 13 of Juristat. Catalogue no. 85-002. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Giles, Chris, & Jackson, Margaret (2003) “Bill C-7: The New Youth Criminal Justice Act: A Darker Young Offenders Act?,” 27 International J. of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Canada (1982) The Criminal Law in Canadian Society. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Canada (1984) Sentencing. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Canada (1998) A Strategy for the Renewal of Youth Justice. Ottawa: Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Government of New Zealand (1998) “Table 8: Rate of imprisonment (including remands) per 100,000 total population by selected jurisdictions 1986–1995,” http://www.justice.govt.nz/pubs/reports/1998/imprisonment/chapter_5.html.Google Scholar
Haggerty, Kevin D. (2001) Making Crime Count. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, John (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogeveen, Bryan (2005) “‘If we are tough on crime, if we punish crime, then people get the message’: Constructing and governing the punishable young offender in Canada during the late 1990s,” 7 Punishment and Society 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office (1988) Punishment, Custody and the Community. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2003) Prison Statistics, England and Wales, 2002. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty, November. Cm 5996, £25.75. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Home Office (2004a) “Offender Management Caseload Statistics, 2003. England and Wales (December 2004).” http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hosbpubs1.html (accessed 23 May 2005).Google Scholar
Home Office (2004b) “Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004.” Home Office Statistical Bulletin, July 2004.Google Scholar
Hurd, Right Honourable Lord Hurd of Westwell (formerly Douglas Hurd) (2004) “Are Prison Reformers Winning the Arguments? The 2004 Prisoners' Education Trust Lecture,” 154 Prison Service J. 3–5.Google Scholar
Hutton, Neil (2005) “Beyond Populist Punitiveness?,” 7 Punishment and Society 243–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruttschnitt, Candace, & Gartner, Rosemary (2003) “Women's Imprisonment,” in Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 30. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2000) “The Fall in the Finnish Prison Population,” 1 J. of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2001) “Sentencing and Punishment in Finland: The Decline of the Repressive Ideal,” in Tonry, M. & Frase, R. S., eds., Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio (2005) “Punishment and Prisoner Rates in Scandinavia.” Unpublished draft paper, National Research Institute of Legal Policy, prepared for and presented to the Conference on Penal Policy, University of Minnesota Law School, May 2005.Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Canada (1977) Our Criminal Law. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1989) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Toronto: Canadian-American Committee, C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
Manson, Allan (2001) The Law of Sentencing. Toronto: Irwin Law.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jeffrey, & O'Malley, Pat (2005) “Missing the punitive turn? Canadian criminal justice, ‘balance’, and penal modernism,” in Pratt, J. et al., eds., The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Devon, United Kingdom: Willan.Google Scholar
Millie, Andrew, et al. (2003) “Understanding the Growth in the Prison Population in England and Wales,” 3 Criminal Justice 369–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newburn, Tim (2002) “Atlantic Crossings: ‘Policy Transfer’ and Crime Control in the USA and Britain,” 4 Punishment and Society 165–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newburn, Tim (2005) “Criminal Justice and Penal Policy in England and Wales.” Unpublished draft paper, London School of Economics, National Research Institute of Legal Policy, prepared for and presented to the Conference on Penal Policy, University of Minnesota Law School, May 2005.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Ian (2004) “Imprisonment and Penal Policy in Ireland,” 43 The Howard J. 253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, Ian, & O'Sullivan, Eoin (2003) “The Politics of Intolerance–Irish Style,” 43 British J. of Criminology 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakes, Francis (2004) “The Politics of Discontent: The Emergence of a New Criminal Justice Discourse in the Netherlands,” 43 The Howard J. 267–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrunik, Michael (2003) “The Hare and the Tortoise: Dangerousness and Sex Offender Policy in the United States and Canada,” 45 Canadian J. of Criminology and Criminal Justice 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, John (2002) Punishment and Civilization: Penal Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Society. New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada (2001) “Public Fear of Crime and Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System,” http://www.psepc-sppcc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/200111_e.asp (accessed 12 May 2005).Google Scholar
Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System (1995). Toronto: Queen's Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent (1999) Due Process and Victims' Rights. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent (1998) “The Evolution of Penal Policy in Canada,” 32 Social Policy and Administration 420–37.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent (2002) “Determining Parole Eligibility Dates for Life Prisoners: Lessons from Jury Hearings in Canada,” 4 Punishment and Society 103–13.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., & Gabor, Thomas (2004) “Living in the Shadow of Prison: Lessons from the Canadian Experience in Decarceration,” 44 British J. of Criminology 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., & Melchers, Ronald (2003) “The Incarceration of Aboriginal Offenders: Trends from 1978 to 2001,” 45 Canadian J. of Criminology and Criminal Justice 211–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., et al. (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rock, , The Honourable Allan (1996) “Keynote Address: Crime, Punishment and Public Expectations,” in Brisson, J. M. & Greschner, D., eds., Public Perceptions of the Administration of Justice. Montreal: Canadian Institute for the Administration of Justice.Google Scholar
Russell, Peter H., & Ziegel, Jacob S. (1991) “Federal Judicial Appointments: An Appraisal of the First Mulroney Government's Appointments and the New Judicial Advisory Committees,” 41 University of Toronto Law J. 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, Henry, & Reitz, Kevin R. (2003) The Challenge of Crime: Rethinking Our Response. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scottish Executive Online (2005) http://www.scotland.gov.uk/stats/bulletins/00356-01.asp (accessed 4 June 2005).Google Scholar
Segal, Jennifer A. (2000) “Judicial decision making and the impact of election year rhetoric,” 84 Judicature 26–33.Google Scholar
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics (2004) Available at http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook.Google Scholar
Standing Committee on Justice and the Solicitor General (1993) Crime Prevention in Canada: Toward a National Strategy. Twelfth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and the Solicitor General.” Dr. Bob Horner, M.P., Chairman, February. House of Commons, Canada.Google Scholar
Thomas, Mikhail (2004) “Adult Criminal Court Statistics, 2003/4.” Vol. 24, No. 10 of Juristat. Catalogue Number 85-002-XPE. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (1995) Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in the United States. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (1999) “Why Are U.S. Incarceration Rates So High?,” 45 Crime and Delinquency 419–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2001) “Unthought Thoughts: The Influence of Changing Sensibilities on Penal Policies,” 3 Punishment and Society 167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2004a) Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2004b) Punishment and Politics: Evidence and Emulation in the Making of English Crime Control Policy. Devon, United Kingdom: Willan.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael (2004c) “Why Aren't German Penal Policies Harsher and Imprisonment Rates Higher?,” 5 German Law J. 1187–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, & Manza, Jeff (2002) “Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States,” 67 American Sociological Rev. 777–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varma, Kimberly N. (2000) “Exploring Age and Maturity in Youth Justice,” Ph.D. thesis, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Vitiello, Michael (1997) “Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?,” 87 The J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 395–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hofer, Hanns (2003) “Prison Populations as Political Constructs. The Case of Finland, Holland and Sweden,” 4 J. of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, Roy (2003) “Global Incarceration and Prison Trends,” 3 Forum on Crime and Society 65–78.Google Scholar
Wasik, Martin (1997) “England Repeals Key 1991 Sentencing Reforms,” in Tonry, M. & Hatlestad, K., eds., Sentencing Reform in Overcrowded Times. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weigend, Thomas (2001) “Sentencing and Punishment in Germany,” in Tonry, M. & Frase, R. S., eds., Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Young, Warren, & Brown, Mark (1993) “Cross-National Comparisons of Imprisonment,” in Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zedner, Lucia (2002) “Dangers and Dystopias in Penal Theories,” 22 Oxford J. of Legal Studies 341–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. (2001) “Imprisonment Rates and the New Politics of Criminal Punishment,” 3 Punishment and Society 161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

M.[C.A.], 1 S.C.R. 500, at 565 (1996).Google Scholar
R. v. Borde, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Docket C38189 (2003).Google Scholar
R. v. Gladue, 1 S.C.R. 688 (1999).Google Scholar
R. v. Morrissette and two others, 1 C.C.C. (2d) 307 (1970).Google Scholar
R. v. Proux, 1 S.C.R. 61 (2000).Google Scholar
R. v. Smith, 34 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), 3 S.C.R. 519 (2002).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, Chapter C-46 (as amended).Google Scholar
Criminal Justice Act (England), 12 Statutes 1484 (1991).Google Scholar
Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada), S.C. 2002, c. 1 (2003).Google Scholar