Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T01:47:19.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business Litigation in the Transition: A Portrait of Debt Collection in Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Kathryn Hendley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Russian firms are drowning in debt. Managers are increasingly turning to the courts for help. Drawing on a database of 100 non-payments cases decided by three courts in 2000, the article explores the parameters of this litigation and the motivations for filing lawsuits. The analysis shows that the docket is dominated by small-scale disputes between trading partners with short shared histories, suggesting that those who have long-term, trust-based relationships avoid the courts. Along with fear of disrupting ongoing relationships, the disinclination to use the courts is also motivated by a reluctance to open up transactions to state scrutiny. By contrast, the petty disputes that are brought to court tend to be simple and, therefore, managers are willing to risk exposure to the state. Indeed, in a world in which firms manipulate their financial records to create the impression of no income in order to avoid taxes (often putting bogus debts on the books), some of these managers bring cases even when there is little chance of recovering the debt because the decision provides convincing evidence to the tax authorities that the debt is bona fide.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 305 - 348
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Thanks are due to Stewart Macaulay, Bob Kagan, Bert Kritzer, Peter Murrell, and Joe Sanders for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. Research assistance was ably provided by Cem Gunusen, Timofey Milovanov, and Michael Morgalla. The field research would not have been possible without the cooperation and assistance of the Solidarity Center in Moscow, Sutyazhnik in Ekaterinburg, and the Center for Legal Reform in Saratov. Many people in these centers deserve thanks, including Irene Stevenson, Elena Gerasimova, Ekaterina Sukhacheva, Sergei Belyaev, Svetlana Mukhambetova, Marina Nemytina, and Alexei Telovalnikov. Support for the field research in the arbitrazh courts over the past decade has been provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research. Support during the writing of the article was provided by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, the University of Wisconsin Law School, and the Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies at the University of Notre Dame.

References

Arbitrazhnyi protsesual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii [APK] (1995) Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, no. 6, 25–79.Google Scholar
Arbitrazhnyi protsesual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii [APK] (2002) Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, special supplement to no. 8.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Daniel, & Li, Wei (2000) “Tax Rights in Transition Economies: A Tragedy of the Commons?,” 76 J. of Public Economics 369–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard (1994) “The Infrastructure for Avoiding Civil Litigation: Comparing Cultures of Legal Behavior in The Netherlands and West Germany,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 789–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caner, Selcuk, & Mokhtari, Manouchehr (2000) “Arrears and Their Implications for Economic Performance in the Russian Federation,” 36 Russian and East European Finance and Trade 27–53.Google Scholar
Cheit, Ross E., & Gerson, Jacob E. (2000) “Why Businesses Sue Each Other: An Empirical Study of State Court Litigation,” 25 Law and Social Inquiry 798–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Torrey (2001) “In Search of Corporate Governance,” Moscow Times, 28 May.Google Scholar
Dunworth, Terence, & Rogers, Joel (1996) “Corporations in Court: Big Business Litigation in U.S. Federal Courts 1971–1991,” 21 Law and Social Inquiry 497–592.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (198081) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc, & Rogers, Joel (1991) “A Transformation of American Business Disputing? Some Preliminary Observations,” Institute for Legal Studies Working Paper DPRP 10-3.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. (1985) “Macaulay, Macneil, and the Discovery of Solidarity and Power in Contract Law,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 565–76.Google Scholar
Goskomstat (2000) Rossiiskii statisticheskii ezhegodnik. Moscow.Google Scholar
Goskomstat (2001) Regiony Rossii. Moscow.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner, & Kandel, Eugene (1995) “Contract Enforcement Institutions: Historical Perspectives and Current Status in Russia,” in Lazar, E. P., ed., Economic Transition in Eastern Europe and Russia. Stanford: Hoover Press.Google Scholar
Guseva, Alya, & Rona-Tas, Akos (2001) “Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Russian and American Credit Card Markets Compared,” 66 American Sociological Rev. 623–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Janothan, & Shleifer, Andrei (1998) “Private Enforcement of Public Laws: A Theory of Legal Reform,” 88 American Economic Rev. 398–403.Google Scholar
Hazard, John N. (1962) “Furniture Arrangement as a Symbol of Judicial Roles,” 19 Etc. 181.Google Scholar
Heise, Michale (2000) “Justice Delayed?: An Empirical Analysis of Civil Case Disposition Time,” 50 Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 813–49.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (1998a) “Growing Pains: Balancing Justice & Efficiency in the Russian Economic Courts,” 12 Temple International and Comparative Law J. 302–32.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (1998b) “Remaking an Institution: The Transition in Russia from State Arbitrazh to Arbitrazh Courts,” 46 American J. of Comparative Law 93–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (2001) “Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg: Business Disputes in Russia,” in Murrell, P., ed., Assessing the Value of Law in Transition Economies. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (2002) “Suing the State in Russia,” 18 Post-Soviet Affairs 148–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn (2004) “Enforcing Judgments in Russian Economic Courts,” 20 Post-Soviet Affairs 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, & Murrell, Peter (2002) “Dispute Resolution in Russia: A Regional Perspective,” in Broadman, H. G., ed., Unleashing Russia's Business Potential: Lessons from the Regions for Building Market Institutions, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 434.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, & Ryterman, Randi (1999) “Do ‘Repeat Players’ Behave Differently in Russia? An Evaluation of Contractual and Litigation Behavior of Russian Enterprises,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 1401–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, & Ryterman, Randi (2000) “Law, Relationships, and Private Enforcement: Transactional Strategies of Russian Enterprises,” 52 Europe-Asia Studies 627–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Murrell, Peter, & Ryterman, Randi (2001) “Agents of Change or Unchanging Agents? The Role of Lawyers within Russian Industrial Enterprises,” 26 Law & Social Inquiry 685–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, Glenn P. (1997) “Business Litigation and Arbitration in Russia,” 31 International Lawyer 1075–103.Google Scholar
Hurst, James Willard (1964) Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836-1915. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Simon, McMillan, John, & Woodruff, Christopher (2002) “Courts and Relational Contracts,” 18 J. of Law, Economics, and Organization 221–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (1984) “The Routinization of Debt Collection: An Essay on Social Change and Conflict in the Courts,” 18 Law & Society Rev. 323–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, Macaully, Stewart, & Rogers, Joel (1996) “‘The More Things Change…’: Business Litigation and Governance in the American Automobile Industry,” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 631–78.Google Scholar
Lambert-Mogiliansky, Ariane, Sonin, Konstantin, & Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina (2001) “Capture of Bankruptcy: Theory and Evidence from Russia,” Mimeo.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Rev. 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1977) “Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract,” 11 Law & Society Rev. 507–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munger, Frank W. Jr. (1986) “Commercial Litigation in West Virginia State and Federal Courts 1870–1940,” 30 American J. of Legal History 322–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudami zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii o gosudarstvennoi poshline” (1997) Postanovlenie Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii, no. 6, March 20, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, April 22.Google Scholar
“O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v Zakon RF ‘O gosudarstvennoi poshline’” (1996) Sobranie Zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii, no. 1.Google Scholar
“Obzor praktiki primeneniya arbitrazhnymi sudame stat'i 333 Grazhdanskogo kodeksaGoogle Scholar
Pomorski, Stanislaw (1977) “State Arbitrazh in the U.S.S.R.: Development, Functions, Organization,” 9 Rutgers-Camden Law J. 61–116.Google Scholar
Priest, George L., & Klein, Benjamin (1984) “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation,” 13 J. of Legal Studies 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proskuryakova, Iuliia (2002) “Veniamin Iakovlev: Biznes poluchil novye pravila resheniia spornykh voprosov,” Rossiiskaia Business-Gazeta, 30 July.Google Scholar
Rossiiskoi Federatsii (1997) Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda, no. 9, 75–80.Google Scholar
Ruhlin, Charles (2000) “Credit Card Debt Collection and the Law: Germany and the United States,” in Kagan, R. A. & Axelrad, L., eds., Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Silver, Charles (2002) “Does Civil Justice Cost Too Much?,” 80 Texas Law Rev. 2073–121.Google Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. Jr., & Foglesong, Todd (2000) Courts and Transition in Russia: The Challenge of Judicial Reform. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
“Sudebno-arbitrazhnaya statistika: Osnovnye pokazateli raboty arbitrazhnykh sudov Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2000-2001 godakh” (2002) Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda, no. 4, 20–29.Google Scholar
Volkov, Vadim (2002) Violent Entrepreneurs: The Use of Force in the Making of Russian Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, Anderi (2000) “Barter in the Russian Economy: Classifications and Implications (Evidence from Case Study Analyses),” 12 Post-Communist Economies 279–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakovlev, V. F., ed. (1999) Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2nd ed. Moscow: INFRA-M.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1985) “Dispute Processing: Re-Examining Continuing Relations and the Law,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 623–46.Google Scholar
Yukov, M. K., & Sherstyuk, V. M. (2000) Kommentarii k Fedral'nomu zamonu Rossiiskoi Federatsii “Ob ispolnitel'nom proizvodstve. Moscow: Gorodets.Google Scholar