Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T14:37:57.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Brief History of Doing Time: The California Institution for Women in the 1960s and the 1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Rosemary Gartner  and
Candace Kruttschnitt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent scholarship on penality describes profound changes in the ideology, discourses, and policies shaping criminal punishment in the late-twentieth-century United States. To assess the implications of these changes for those subject to criminal punishment, we examine the experiences of women in prison at two key points in the recent history of penality. We compare how imprisonment was practiced and responded to at the California Institution for Women in the early 1960s, when the rehabilitative model dominated official penal discourse, and in the mid-1990s, near the height of the “get tough” era. We find that the ways in which women related and responded to other prisoners, to staff, and to the prison regime, while in some ways specific to one or the other penal era, did not fundamentally change. Thus, penal regimes ostensibly informed by profoundly different rationalities nevertheless structured the daily lives of prisoners through a very similar set of deprivations, restrictions, and assumptions.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 267 - 304
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research was supported by grant #SBR-9617285 from the National Science Foundation. By sharing the data from their study, David Ward and Gene Kassebaum made this research possible. For their assistance with the collection of the survey and historical data, we thank Robert Nash Parker and the Presley Center for Crime and Justice Studies, University of California, Riverside; Julie Beck; and Doreen Anderson-Facile. Mariana Valverde, Kelly Hannah-Moffat, and the current and former editors of the Law & Society Review provided useful comments on earlier drafts of this article.

References

Abramsky, Sasha (2002) Hard Time Blues. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Kenneth (1992) “Adjusting to Prison Life,” in Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol 16. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Michael, & Longhurst, Brian (1994) Discourse, Power and Justice: Toward a New Sociology of Imprisonment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berk, Bernard (1966) “Organizational Goals and Inmate Organization,” 71 American J. of Sociology 522–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Richard A., Messigner, Sheldon L., Rauma, David, & Berecochea, John E. (1983) “Prisons as Self-Regulating Systems: A Comparison of Historical Patterns in California for Male and Female Offenders,” 17 Law & Society Rev. 547–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Barbara, Chesney-Lind, Meda, & Owen, Barbara (1994) Women in California Prisons: Hidden Victims of the War on Drugs. San Francisco: Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Bookspan, Shelley (1991) A Germ of Goodness: The California State Prison System, 1851-1944. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary (1996) “Resistance and Compliance in Women's Prisons: Towards a Critique of Legitimacy,” 7 Critical Criminology 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, Mary (1999) Engendering Resistance: Agency and Power in Women's Prisons. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Mary (2000) “Confining Femininity: A History of Gender, Power and Imprisonment,” 4 Theoretical Criminology 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, A. Keith (1990) “Parole in Transition: A Comparative Study of Origins, Developments and Prospects for the 1990s,” in Tonry, M. & Morris, N., eds., Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol 12. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony (1995) “The Philosophy and Politics of Imprisonment and Sentencing,” in Clarkson, C. & Morgan, R., eds., The Politics of Sentencing Reform. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony (1999) “Interpersonal Violence and Social Order in Prisons,” in Tonry, M. & Petersilia, J., eds., Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Vol. 26. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buwalda, May (1963) “California Institution for Women,” Correctional Rev. 13–15, (September/October).Google Scholar
California Bureau of Criminal Statistics/California Department of Justice (various years) Crime and Delinquency in California. Sacramento: California Bureau of Criminal Statistics/California Department of Justice.Google Scholar
California Department of Corrections (1957) Orientation to Employment in State Correctional Service. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
California Department of Corrections (1960) Rules of the Director of Corrections and of the Superintendent of the California Institution for Women. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
California Department of Corrections (1962) Biennial Report of Department of Corrections. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
California Department of Corrections (1994) Inside Corrections: Public Safety, Public Service. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
California Department of Corrections (1999) Characteristics of Population in California State Prisons by Institution, December 31, 1998. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
California Senate Concurrent Resolution 33 Commission on Female Inmate and Parolee Issues (1994) Final Report. Sacramento: CDC.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nancy D. (2000) Using Women: Gender, Drug Policy and Social Justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carlen, Pat (1994) “Why Study Women's Imprisonment or Anyone Else's?,” 24 British J. of Criminology 131–40.Google Scholar
Carter, Iverne (1963) “The Challenge at C.I.W,” Correctional Rev. 12 (September/October).Google Scholar
Cassel, Russell, & Van Vorst, Robert B. (1961) “Psychological Needs of Women in a Correctional Institution,” 23 American J. of Corrections 22–24.Google Scholar
Clear, Todd (1994) Harm in American Penology: Offenders, Victims, and Their Communities. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Clemmer, Donald (1950) “Imprisonment as a Source of Criminality,” 41 J. of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 311–19.Google Scholar
Colvin, Mark (1992) The Penitentiary in Crisis: From Accommodation to Riot in New Mexico. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Cressey, Donald (1959) “Contradictory Directives in Complex Organizations: The Case of the Prison,” 4 Administrative Science Q. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Eric (1994) The Rise and Fall of California's Radical Prison Movement. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cotto, Juanita (1996) Gender, Ethnicity, and the State: Latina and Latino Prison Politics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
DiIulio, John J. (1987) Governing Prisons: A Comparative Study of Correctional Management. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Downes, David (2001) “The Macho Penal Economy: Mass Incarceration in the United States – A European Perspective,” in Garland, D., ed., Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, & Simon, Jonathan (1992) “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications,” 30 Criminology 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, & Simon, Jonathan (1994) “Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law,” in Nelken, D., ed., The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Field Institute (various years) The California Poll. San Francisco: Field Institute.Google Scholar
Fox, James G. (1982) “Women in Prison: A Study in the Social Reality of Stress,” in Johnson, R. & Toch, H., eds., The Pains of Imprisonment. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Fox, James G. (1984) “Women's Prison Policy, Prisoner Activism, and the Impact of the Contemporary Feminist Movement: A Case Study,” 1 The Prison J. 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Estelle B. (1981) Their Sisters' Keeps: Women's Prison Reform in America, 1830-1930. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (1995) “Penal Modernism and Postmodernism,” in Blomberg, T. & Cohen, S., eds., Punishment and Social Control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garland, David (1996) “The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society,” 36 British J. of Criminology 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (1997) “‘Governmentality’ and the Problem of Crime: Foucault, Criminology and Sociology,” 1 Theoretical Criminology 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, Rosemary, & Kruttschnitt, Candace (2003) “Women and Imprisonment: A Case Study of Two California Prisons,” in Blomberg, T. & Cohen, S., eds., Punishment and Social Control, 2nd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Genders, Elaine, & Player, Elaine (1990) “Women Lifers: Assessing the Experience,” 80 The Prison J. 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giallombardo, Rose (1966) Society of Women: A Study of a Women's Prison. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Girshick, Lori (1999) No Safe Haven: Stories of Women in Prison. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gomez, Laura A. (1997) Misconceiving Mothers: Legislators, Prosecutors and the Politics of Prenatal Drug Exposure. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Kimberly (2000) “The Changing Nature of Interpersonal Relationships in a Woman's Prison,” 80 The Prison J. 442–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusky, Oscar (1959) “Organizational Goals and the Behavior of Informal Leaders,” 65 American J. of Sociology 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney, Lynn (1996) “Homeboys, Babies, and Men in Suits: The State and the Reproduction of Male Dominance,” 61 American Sociological Rev. 759–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (1999) “Moral Agent or Actuarial Subject: Risk and Women's Imprisonment,” 3 Theoretical Criminology 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah-Moffat, Kelly (2001) Punishment in Disguise. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffernan, Esther (1972) Making It in Prison: The Square, Cool and the Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jacobs, James (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kruttschnitt, Candace, Gartner, Rosemary, & Miller, Amy (2000) “Doing Her Own Time? Women's Responses to Prison in the Context of the Old and the New Penology,” 38 Criminology 681–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruttschnitt, Candace, & Gartner, Rosemary (2003) “Women's Imprisonment,” in Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 30. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lucken, Karol (1998) “Contemporary Penal Trends: Modern or Postmodern?,” 38 British J. of Criminology 106–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (1998) “Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 839–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Mona (2000) “Rehabilitation as Rhetoric: The Ideal of Reformation in Contemporary Parole Discourse and Practices,” 2 Punishment and Society 40–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandaraka-Sheppard, Alexandra (1986) The Dynamics of Aggression in Women's Prisons in England. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Gower.Google Scholar
Mauer, Marc, Potler, Cathy, & Wolf, Richard (1999) Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs, and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC: Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Messinger, Sheldon, Berecochea, John E., Rauma, David, & Berk, Richard A. (1985) “The Foundations of Parole in California,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messinger, Sheldon, & Johnson, Philip (1978) “California's Determinate Sentencing Laws,” in Determinate Sentencing: Reform or Regression? Proceedings of a Special Conference on Determinate Sentencing at the University of California, 1977. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Morales, Richard (1980) History of the California Institution for Women, 1927-1960: A Woman's Regime. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
O'Malley, Pat (1992) “Risk, Power, and Crime Prevention,” 21 Economy and Society 252–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, Pat (1999) “Volatile and Contradictory Punishment,” 3 Theoretical Criminology 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Barbara (1998) In the Mix: Struggle and Survival in a Women's Prison. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Barbara (1999) “Women and Imprisonment in the United States: The Gendered Consequences of the U.S. Imprisonment Binge,” in Cook, S. & Davies, S., eds., Harsh Punishment: International Experiences of Women's Imprisonment. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Pollack, Jocelyn M. (1986) Sex and Supervision: Guarding Male and Female Felons. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Pratt, John (2000) “The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men; or the Arrival of Postmodern Penality?,” 40 British J. of Criminology 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, John (2002) Punishment and Civilization: Penal Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Society. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn (1990) Partial Justice: Women in State Prisons, 1800-1935, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Rierden, Andi (1997) The Farm: Life Inside a Women's Prison. Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Rock, Paul (1996) Reconstructing a Women's Prison: The Holloway Redevelopment Project, 1968-1988. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Nikolas (2000) “Government and Control,” in Garland, D. & Sparks, R., eds., Criminology and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silberman, Mathew (1995) A World of Violence. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890-1990. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1994) “In the Place of the Parent: Risk Management and the Government of Campus Life,” 3 Social and Legal Studies 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (2000) “The ‘Society of Captives’ in the Era of Hyper-Incarceration,” 4 Theoretical Criminology 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (2001) “‘Entitlement to Cruelty’: The End of Welfare and the Punitive Mentality in the United States,” in Stenson, K. & Sullivan, R., eds., Crime, Risk, and Justice: The Politics of Crime Control in Liberal Democracies. Devon, United Kingdom: Willan.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, & Feeley, Malcolm (1995) “True Crime: The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime,” in Blomberg, T. & Cohen, S., eds., Punishment and Social Control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, Richard, Bottoms, Anthony E., & Hay, Will (1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, David, Vinter, Robert D., & Perrow, Charles (1966) Organization for Treatment. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sutton, John (1997) “Doing Time: Dynamics of Imprisonment in the Reformist State,” 52 American Sociological Rev. 612–30.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham (1958) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, Gresham, & Messinger, Sheldon L. (1960) “The Inmate Social System,” in Cloward, R., ed., Theoretical Studies in Social Organization of the Prison. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
United States Bureau of the Census (1993) Census of Population and Housing. Vol. 1: Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana (1998) Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Joyce (1982) “Telling Tales in Prison,” in Frankenberg, R., ed., Custom and Conflict in British Society. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ward, David A., & Kassebaum, Gene (1963) “Patterns of Homosexual Behavior Among Female Prison Inmates,” Los Angeles, CA: School of Public Health, Univ. of California.Google Scholar
Ward, David A., & Kassebaum, Gene (1965) Women's Prison: Sex and Social Structure. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P. (1968) “Patterns of Management and Adaptations to Organizational Roles: A Study of Prison Inmates,” 74 American J. of Sociology 146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalba, Serapio R. (1964) Women Prisoners and Their Families. Sacramento: Department of Social Welfare and Department of Corrections.Google Scholar
Zedner, Lucia (1995) “Wayward Sisters: The Prison for Women,” in Morris, N. & Rothman, D. J., eds., The Oxford History of the Prison: The Practice of Punishment in Western Societies. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, & Hawkins, Gordon (1994) “The Growth of Imprisonment in California,” 34 British J. of Criminology 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, & Hawkins, Gordon (1995) Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin, Hawkins, Gordon, & Kamin, Sam (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar