Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T07:03:37.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“What Are You Going to Do with the Village's Knowledge?” Talking Tradition, Talking Law in Hopi Tribal Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Justin B. Richland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Though the details of face-to-face talk and interaction have been studied in Anglo American and British courtrooms, few attempts have been made to extend similar analyses to the study of contemporary indigenous and (post)colonial legal institutions that continue to employ legal processes informed by both Anglo-style adversarial notions of law and “local” notions of law, culture, and tradition. Using methods of legal discourse analysis and language ideology studies, this article investigates how interlocutors in a hearing before the courts of the Hopi Indian Nation construct discourses of tradition and Anglo American jurisprudence in multiple and competing ways, and for significant sociopolitical effect. An argument is thus made for attending to the microdetails of sociolegal interactions as an important site for exploring the complex articulations between the contemporary lives of indigenous peoples and the laws with which they are imbricated.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 235 - 271
Copyright
© 2005 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The research and preparation of this manuscript was undertaken with support from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and a UCLA Institute of American Cultures Predoctoral Research Grant. I would like to thank Paul V. Kroskrity, Alessandro Duranti, and Sally Merry for their helpful comments and critiques of earlier versions of this article. Of course, all remaining errors are mine alone. I would also like to thank members of the Hopi Tribe and the Hopi Tribal Court, who wish to remain nameless, for their hospitality and graciousness during my periods of research on the Hopi Reservation. I am honored by their friendship and collegiality.

References

References

Amsterdam, Anthony, & Bruner, Jerome (2000) Minding the Law. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Drew, Paul (1979) Order in the Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, F. Lee, & Rothblatt, Henry B. (1978) Cross-Examination in Criminal Trials. San Francisco: Bancroft-Whitney.Google Scholar
Barsh, Russel L. (1999) “Putting the Tribe in Tribal Courts: Possible? Desirable?,” 8 Kansas J. of Law & Public Policy 74–97.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (1990) “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life,” 19 Annual Rev. of Anthropology 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (2000) “Language Philosophy as Language Ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder,” in Kroskrity, P. V., ed., Regimes of Language. Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series, School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B. (1954) Hopi Ethics. A Theoretical Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. (1993) “Metadiscursive Practices and Scholarly Authority in Folkloristics,” 106 J. of American Folklore 387–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunte, Pamela A. (1992) “‘You can't get there from here.’ Southern Paiute Testimony as Intercultural Communication,” 34 Anthropological Linguistics 19–44.Google Scholar
Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology (1997) Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni, A Hopi Dictionary of Third Mesa Dialect. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000) Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James (2001) “Indigenous Articulations,” 13 The Contemporary Pacific 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, James A. (1989) Being and Becoming Indian. Biographical Studies of North American Frontiers. Chicago: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Clifton, James A. (1997) “Avocational Medicine Men: Inventive ‘Tradition’ and New Age Religiosity in a Western Great Lakes Algonquian Population,” in M., Mauze, ed., Present Is Past. Some Uses of Tradition in Native Societies. New York: Univ. Press of America.Google Scholar
Coffey, Wallace, & Tsosie, Rebecca (2001) “Rethinking the Tribal Sovereignty Doctrine: Cultural Sovereignty and the Collective Future of Indian Nations,” 12 Stanford Law & Policy Rev. 191.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, & Comaroff, John L. (1991) “Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa,” Vol. 1. Of Revelation and Revolution. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John L., & Comaroff, Jean (1997) The Dialectics of Modernity on a South African Frontier, Vol. 2. Of Revelation and Revolution. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, John L. (2001) “Symposium Introduction: Colonialism, Culture, and the Law,” 26 Law and Social Inquiry 305.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O' Barr, William M. (1990) Rules Versus Relationships. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., & O' Barr, William M. (1998) Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John, et al. (1978) “The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom,” 78 Duke Law J. 1375. pmid/249254Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., & Fikenstcher, Wolfgang (1998) “Indian Common Law: The Role of Custom in American Indian Tribal Courts,” 46 American J. of Comparative Law 287.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif (1999) “The Past as Legacy and Project: Postcolonial Criticism in the Perspective of Indigenous Historicism,” in Johnson, T., ed., Contemporary Native American Political Issues. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eades, Diana (1996) “Legal Recognition of Cultural Differences in Communication: The Case of Robyn Kina,” 16 Language and Communication 215–27.Google Scholar
Eades, Diana (2000) “‘I don't think it's an answer to the question.' Silencing Aboriginal Witnesses in Court,” 29 Language in Society 161–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jonathan (1993) “Will the Real Hawaiian Please Stand: Anthropologists and Natives in the Global Struggle for Identity,” 149 Bijdragen: J. of the Royal Institute of Linguistics and Anthropology 738.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1989) “Language and Political Economy,” 18 Annual Rev. of Anthropology 328–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, Armin (1994) The Invention of Prophecy. Continuity and Meaning in Hopi Indian Religion. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, F. A. (1989) “The Making of the Maori: Culture Invention and Its Logic,” 91 American Anthropologist 890–902.Google Scholar
Hanson, F. A. (1997) “Empirical Anthropology, Postmodernism, and the Invention of Tradition,” in Mauze, M., ed., Present Is Past. Some Uses of Tradition in Native Societies. New York: Univ. Press of America.Google Scholar
Hunter, Mary Jo B. (1999) “Tribal Court Opinions: Justice and Legitimacy,” 8 Kansas J. of Law and Public Policy 142.Google Scholar
Joh, Elizabeth E. (2000) “Custom, Tribal Court Practice, and Popular Justice,” 25 American Indian Law Rev. 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, Margaret (1992) “Specters of Inauthenticity,” 4 The Contemporary Pacific 49–72.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V., ed. (2000) Regimes of Language. Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Advanced Seminar Series, School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jerrold (1992) Orayvi Revisited. Social Stratification in an “Egalitarian” Society. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Linnekin, J. (1990) “The Politics of Culture in the Pacific,” in Linnekin, J. & Poyer, L., eds., Cultural Identity and Ethnicity in the Pacific. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawai'i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnekin, J. (1991) “Cultural Invention and the Dilemma of Authenticity,” 93 American Anthropologist 446–9. pmid/1891504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory (1995) “Language, Law and Society: Policy Implications of the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 669–701.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory (1998) “Discursive Hegemony in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial: Evidence of an Age Graded Allusion in Expert Testimony,” 8 Pragmatics 3–19.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory (1999) “Intertextuality, Affect, and Ideology in Legal Discourse,” 19 Text 73–109.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory (2001) Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mauze, Marie, ed. (1997) Present Is Past. Uses of Tradition in Native Societies. New York: Univ. Press of America.Google Scholar
Melinkoff, David (1963) Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even. Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (1994) “Courts as Performances: Domestic Violence Hearings in a Hawai'i Family Court,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. (2000) Colonizing Hawai'i. The Cultural Power of the Law. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth (1994) “Legal Language: Pragmatics, Poetics, and Social Power,” 23 American Rev. of Anthropology 435–55.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth (1996) “Recontextualization as Socialization: Text and Pragmatics in the Law School Classroom,” in Silverstein, M. & Urban, G., eds., Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth (1998) “Linguistic Ideology and Praxis in U.S. Law School Classrooms,” in Scheiffelin, B., Woolard, K., & Kroskrity, P., eds., Language Ideologies Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, & Weissbourd, Bernard (1985) “Legal Ideology and Linguistic Theory: Variability and Its Limits,” in Mertz, E. & Parmentier, R., eds., Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Miller, Bruce G. (2001) The Problem of Justice. Tradition and Law in the Coast Salish World. Lincoln, NE, and London: Univ. of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
O'Barr, William M. (1982) Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1993) “Evidentiary Standards for American Trials: Just the Facts,” in Hill, J. & Irvine, J., eds. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. Series in Social and Cultural Foundations of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1994) “Local Legal Hegemony in the Tongan Magistrate's Court: How Sisters Fare Better than Wives,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1998) Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (2000) “Constructing a Tongan Nation-State through Language Ideology in the Courtroom,” in Kroskrity, P. V., ed., Regimes of Language. Ideologies, Polities, Identities: Advanced Seminar Series. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Pommersheim, Frank (1995a) “Tribal Courts: Providers of Justice and Protectors of Sovereignty,” 79 Judicature 134.Google Scholar
Pommersheim, Frank (1995b) Braid of Feathers. American Indian Law and Contemporary Tribal Life. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Robert B. (1997a) “Strengthening Tribal Sovereignty Through Government Reform: What Are the Issues,” 7 Kansas J. of Law and Public Policy 82.Google Scholar
Porter, Robert B. (1997b) “Strengthening Tribal Sovereignty Through Peacemaking: How the Anglo-American Legal Tradition Destroys Indigenous Societies,” 20 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 235–304.Google Scholar
Probert, Walter. (1959) “The Language-Behavior of Lawyers,” 35 University of Pennsylvania Law Review.Google Scholar
Rushforth, Scott, & Upham, Steadman (1992) A Hopi Social History: Anthropological Perspectives on Sociocultural Persistence and Change. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, et al., eds. (1998) Language Ideologies. Practice and Theory. Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, 16. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, & Urban, Greg (1996) Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1990) The Post-Colonial Critic: Essays, Strategies, Dialogues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Titiev, Mischa (1944) “Old Oraibi. A study of the Hopi Indians of Third Mesa,” Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Papers, v. 22, no. 1.Google Scholar
Trask, Haunai Kay (1991) “Natives and Anthropologists: The Colonial Struggle,” 6 The Contemporary Pacific 159–67.Google Scholar
Tso, Thom (1989) “The Process of Decision Making in Tribal Courts,” 31 Arizona Law Rev. 225–35.Google Scholar
Vincenti, Carey N. (1995) “The Reemergence of Tribal Society and Traditional Justice Systems,” 79 Judicature 134.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter (1988) Deliberate Acts. Changing Hopi Culture Through the Oraibi Split. Tucson: Univ. of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter (1998) Rethinking Hopi Ethnography. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn (1998) “Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism,” 8 Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zion, James (1987) “Searching for Indian Common Law,” in Morse, B. & Woodman, G., eds., Indigenous Law and the State. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

James V. Smith, CIV-018-94 (1994).Google Scholar
Hopi Indian Credit Association v. Thomas, AP-001-84 (1996).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Constitution and By-Laws of the Hopi Tribe (1936; Amended 1969, 1980, 1993).Google Scholar
The Indian Reorganization (Wheeler-Howard) Act, 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 461-462, 464-479 (1934).Google Scholar
Resolution, Hopi Tribe H-12-76 (1976).Google Scholar