Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T16:07:31.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unfounding Sexual Assault: Examining the Decision to Unfound and Identifying False Reports

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Cassia Spohn ,
Clair White  and
Katharine Tellis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the most controversial—and least understood—issues in the area of sexual violence is the prevalence of false reports of rape. Estimates of the rate of false reports vary widely, which reflects differences in way false reports are defined and in the methods that researchers use to identify them. We address this issue using a mixed methods approach that incorporates quantitative and qualitative data on sexual assault cases that were reported to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) in 2008 and qualitative data from interviews with LAPD detectives assigned to investigate reports of sexual assault. We found that the LAPD was clearing cases as unfounded appropriately most, but not all, of the time and we estimated that the rate of false reports among cases reported to the LAPD was 4.5 percent. We also found that although complainant recantation was the strongest predictor of the unfounding decision, other factors indicative of the seriousness of the incident and the credibility of the victim also played a role. We interpret these findings using an integrated theoretical perspective that incorporates both Black's sociological theory of law and Steffensmeier, Ulmer, and Kramer's focal concerns perspective.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 161 - 192
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Belknap, Joanne (2010) “Rape: Too Hard to Report and Too Easy to Discredit Victims,” 16 Violence Against Women 1335–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1980) The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald (1989) Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
DePrince, Anne P., et al. (2012) “Motivated Forgetting and Misremembering: Perspectives from Betrayal Trauma Theory,” in Belli, R. F., ed., True and False Recovered Memories: Toward a Reconciliation of the Debate. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 58. New York: Springer. 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrich, Susan (1987) Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa (1991) “Discrediting Victims' Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections,” 38 Social Problems 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohmann, Lisa (1997) “Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decision Making,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 531–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Sir Matthew (1736 1971) Historia Placitorum Coronae. The History of the Pleas of the Crown, 2 vols., Emlyn, Sollom, ed. London, 1736. Reprint. Classical English Law Texts. London, UK: Professional Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
Harris, Jessica, & Grace, Sharon (1999) A Question of Evidence?: Investigating and Prosecuting Rape in the 1990s. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Redding, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
IACP (2005) Investigating Sexual Assaults: Concepts and Issues Paper. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Johnson, Brian D., & Betsinger, Sara (2009) “Punishing the ‘Model Minority’: Asian American Sentencing Outcomes in Federal District Courts,” 47 Criminology 1045–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Jan (2004) “Beyond Belief? Police, Rape and Women's Credibility,” 4 Criminal Justice 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalvin, Harry, & Zeisel, Hans (1966) The American Jury. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kanin, Eugene J. (1994) “False Rape Allegations,” 23 Archives of Sexual Behavior 81–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, Liz (2010) “The (In)Credible Words of Women: False Allegations in European Rape Research,” 16 Violence Against Women 1345–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, Liz, Lovett, Jo, & Regan, Linda (2005) A Gap or Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. Home Office Research Study 293. London, UK: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerstetter, Wayne A. (1990) “Gateway to Justice: Police and Prosecutorial Response to Sexual Assaults against Women,” 81 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 267–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konradi, Amanda (2007) Taking the Stand: Rape Survivors and the Prosecution of Rapists. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
LaFree, Gary D. (1989) Rape and Criminal Justice: The Social Construction of Sexual Assault. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lisak, David, Gardinier, Lori, Nicksa, Sarah C., & Cote, Ashley M. (2010) “False Allegations of Sexual Assault: An Analysis of Ten Years of Reported Case,” 16 Violence Against Women 1318–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsway, Kimberly A. (2010) “Trying to Move the Elephant in the Living Room: Responding to the Challenge of False Rape Reports,” 16 Violence Against Women 1356–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsway, Kimberly A., Archambault, Joanne, & Lisak, David (2009) “False Reports: Moving Beyond the Issue to Successfully Investigate and Prosecute Non-Stranger Sexual Assault,” 3 The Voice 1–11.Google Scholar
O'Neal, Eryn N., Spohn, Cassia C., Tellis, Katharine K., & White, Clair (in press) “The Truth Behind the Lies: The Complex Motivations for False Allegations of Sexual Assault,” Women and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Patterson, Debra, & Campbell, Rebecca (2010) “Why Rape Survivors Participate in the Criminal Justice System,” 38 American Psychologist 191–205.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Raphael, Jody (2008) “Book Review: Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case,” 14 Violence Against Women 370–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumney, Philip N. S. (2006) “False Allegations of Rape,” 65 Cambridge Law J. 128–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Candida L. (2012) “The Truth, the Half-Truth, and Nothing Like the Truth: Reconceptualizing False Rape Allegations,” 52 British J. of Criminology 1152–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spohn, Cassia, Beichner, Dawn, & Davis-Frenzel, Erica (2001) “Prosecutorial Justifications for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the Gateway to Justice,” 48 Social Problems 206–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensmeier, Darrel, Ulmer, Jeffery T., & Kramer, John H. (1998) “The Interaction of Race, Gender, and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black, and Male,” 36 Criminology 763–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theilade, Peter, & Thomsen, Jorgen L (1986) “False Allegations of Rape,” 30 Police Surgeon 17–22.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (2004) Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar