Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T05:14:44.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Ronen Shamir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Alien Tort Claims Act suits against multinational corporations as an immediate context for discussion, this article explores the emerging field of corporate social responsibility. The article argues for an understanding of concrete legal struggles as part of broader competing strategies for regulating corporate obligations to a multitude of stakeholders. By identifying and analyzing the positions of concrete actors who operate in the field, the main thesis of this article is that the field strongly tilts in the direction of voluntary and self-reliant models of corporate responsibility. The article identifies this process as consistent with the privatization of regulative structures in general and with extant modeling of corporate governance in particular, and points at the correlation between these trends and the interests of multinational corporations.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 635 - 664
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I wish to thank the anonymous reviewers of LSR for their insightful and helpful comments. This research was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation (Grant No. 943/0233.0).

References

References

American Bar Association (2003) “Report of the ABA Task Force on Corporate Responsibility.” http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/corporateresponsibility/final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Ayres, Ian, & Braithwaite, John (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (2002) Society Under Siege. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1997) What Is Globalization? Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bollier, David (1996) Aiming Higher. New York: Amacom.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, & Chiapello, Eve (2002) “The New Spirit of Capitalism.” Paper presented at Europe in the New Millennium: Enlarging, Experimenting, Evolving. 13th International Conference of Europeanists, March 14–16, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis (2001) “The Costs of International Human Rights Litigation,” 2 Chicago J. of International Law 457.Google Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. (1989) Business and Society: Ethics & Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Brown Judith (2002) “Fighting for Justice Abroad Through Litigation at Home: Multinationals in U.S. Courts.” Paper presented at the 2002 Meetings of the Law and Society Association, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew (2000) “The Question of Jurisdiction Under International Criminal Law over Legal Persons: Lessons from the Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court,” in Kamminga, M. T. & Zia-Zarifi, S., eds., Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew, & Jerbi, Scott (2002) “Categories of Corporate Complicity in Human Rights Abuses,” 24 Hastings International and Comparative Law Rev. 339–49.Google Scholar
D'amato, Anthony (1988) “The Alien Tort Statute and Founding of the Constitution,” 82 American J. of International Law 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidsson, Pall A. (2002) “Legal Enforcement of Corporate Social Responsibility within the EU,” 8 Columbia J. of European Law 529.Google Scholar
DeWinter, Rebecca (2001) “The Anti-Sweatshop Movement: Constructing Corporate Moral Agency in the Global Apparel Industry,” 15 Ethics & International Affairs 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant G. (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dickerson, Clair Moore (2002) “Human Rights: The Emerging Norm of Corporate Social Responsibility,” 76 Tulane Law Rev. 1431.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James, & Gupta, Akhil (2002) “Spatializing States: Governmentality in Africa and India,” 29 American Ethnologist 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayton, Jeffrey T. (2003) “From Here to Extraterritoriality: American Sovereignty Within and Beyond Borders,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review (2001) “Corporate Liability for Violations of International Human Rights Law,” 114 Harvard Law Rev. 2025.Google Scholar
Held, David (2002) “Globalization, Corporate Practice and Cosmopolitan Social Standards,” 1 Contemporary Political Theory 59–78. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgenberg, Hartmut (1999) “A Fresh Look at Soft Law,” 10 European J. of International Law 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. (1982) “The Doctrine of Objective Causation,” in Kairys, D., ed., The Politics of Law—A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Howard, John (2002) “The Alien Tort Claims Act: Is Our Litigation-Run-Amok Going Global?” The United States Chamber of Commerce Op-Eds, October 2002, http://www.uschamber.com/press/opeds/0210howarditigation.htm. Accessed August 10, 2004.Google Scholar
Howitt, Richard (1998) “Report on EU Standards for European Enterprises Operating in Developing Countries: Toward a European Code of Conduct,” Committee on Development and Cooperation, European Parliament, 17 December 1998. http://www.europarl.eu.int/committees/deve_home.htm. Accessed August 11, 2004.Google Scholar
International Chamber of Commerce (2002) “Extra-Territorial Application of National Laws,” Commentary by the ICC Chairmanship, Department of Policy and Business Practices. http://www.iccwbo.org/home/statements_rules/statements/2002/extra-territorial%20application%20of%;20national%20laws.asp. Accessed August 11, 2004.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Niles, Tom (2002) “The Very Long Arm of American Law,” November 5, http://www.usaengage.org. Accessed September 10, 2003.Google Scholar
Oxfam International (2003) White Paper on Globalization. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/trade/globalisation.htm. Accessed December 10.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine (2002) The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Joel R. (2001) “Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible Under International Law,” 24 Hastings International and Comparative Law Rev. 285–96.Google Scholar
Power, Michael (1997) The Audit Explosion. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, Sethi (2002) “Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Success of Globalization,” 16 Ethics and International Affairs 89–106.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Cesar A. (2003) “Global Governance, Cross-Border Organizing, and Labor Rights: Codes of Conduct and Anti-Sweatshop Struggles in Global Apparel Factories in Mexico and Guatemala.” M.A. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Sacharoff, Ariande K. (1998) “Multinationals in Host Countries: Can They Be Held Liable Under The Alien Tort Claims Act For Human Rights Violations?,” 23 Brooklyn J. of International Law 927.Google Scholar
Sklair, Leslie (1995) The Sociology of the Global System. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sklair, Leslie (1997) “Social Movements for Global Capitalism: The Transnational Capitalist Class in Action,” 4 Rev. of International Political Economy 514–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, Beth (2000) “Corporate Accountability: International Human Rights Litigation Against Corporations in US Courts,” in Kamminga, M. T. & Zia-Zarifi, S., eds., Liability of Multinational Corporations under International Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
USA-Engage (2004) “The Alien Tort Provision: Correcting the Abuse of an Early Federalist Statute.” http://www.usaengage.org/legislative/2003/alientort/alientorttpcases.html. Accessed August 11, 2004.Google Scholar
Winston, Morton (2002) “NGO Strategies for Promoting Corporate Social Responsibility,” 16 Ethics and International Affairs 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Aguinda v. Texaco, Inc., 142 F. Supp. 2d 534 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).Google Scholar
Doe, et al. v. Unocal Corporation, et al., 110 F. Supp. 2d 1294 (C.D. Cal. 2000).Google Scholar
Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F. 2d 876 (2nd Cir. 1980).Google Scholar
John Doe I, et al. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., et al., No. 01CV01357 (D.D.C. filed June 19, 2001).Google Scholar
Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F. 3d at 232 (2nd Cir. 1995).Google Scholar
Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina, 965 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992)Google Scholar
Sinaltrainal, et al. v. Coca-Cola Co., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1345 (S.D. Fla. 2003).Google Scholar
The Presbyterian Church of Sudan et al. v. Talisman Energy, Inc., et al., 244 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (Civil Action No. 01 CV 9882 [DLC]).Google Scholar
United States v. Alvarez-Machain (No. 03-485) and Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, No. 03-339, (542 U.S. 2004).Google Scholar
Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., 226 F. 3d 88 (2nd Cir. 2000).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20, §9(b), 1 Stat. 73, 77 (1789). 28 U.S.C. §1350.Google Scholar
Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) of 1991, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1350.Google Scholar
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78dd-1.Google Scholar