Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:52:36.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What We Do When We Do Law and Popular Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jessica M. Silbey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2002 , pp. 139 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach, Erich. 1968. Mimesis. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 1998. Deconstruction and Post-Structuralism. On-Line Writings at http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/jbalkin/writings.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1975. Pleasure of the Text Trans. Miller, Richard. Paris: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1991. Responsibility of Forms Trans. Richard, H. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1990. Fatal Strategies. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Beebee, Thomas. 1994. The Ideology of Genre. University Park: Pennsylvania State Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Feldman, Martha S. 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, Paul, and Asimow, Michael. 1996. Reel Justice: The Courtroom Goes to the Movies. Kansas City, Mo.: Andrews and McMeel.Google Scholar
Brooks, Peter, and Gewirtz, Paul, eds. 1996. Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetori. In the Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, Raymond. 1981. What We Talk About When We Talk About Love. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1971. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Ross. 1991. Room for Maneuver. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, J. Allen. 1997. What Happens When Cyberspace Is Used to Lure Children into Sexual Relations–A Brief Look at Important Federal Venue Provisions. Family Law Quarterly, Fall.Google Scholar
Conley, John, and O'Barr, William M. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Of Grammatology Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Gakraroty. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1990. Ideology of the Aesthetic. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felman, Shoshana, and Laub, Dori. 1991. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1991. Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence. In Sarat and Kearns. 1991.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1988. Fish v. Fiss. In Levinson and Mailloux 1988.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen. 1988. Objectivity and Interpretation. In Levinson and Mailloux 1988.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1965. Contract Law in America: A Social and Economic Case Study. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, and Percival, Robert. 1981. The Roots of Justice: Crime and Punishment in Alameda County, California, 1870–1910. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, Eric. 2000. Art and Illusion. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. 1988. Keep off the Grass, Drop Dead, and Other Indeterminacies: A Response to Sanford Levinson. In Levinson and Mailloux 1988.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, ed. 1980. Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson Press.Google Scholar
Hillis, Bradley. 2001. Federal and State Electronic Signature Law in the United States–From the E-Sign Act to Click Wrap: A Legal Guide to the Creation of Binding Transactions in Electronic Commerce. Practising Law Institute, February, p. 634.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda. 1980. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1998. The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Post Modern: 1993–1998. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Law as Literature. In Levinson and Mailloux 1988.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, and Mailloux, Steven, eds. 1988. Interpreting Law and Literature: A Hermeneutic Reader. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Post-Modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Thirtieth anniversary ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Metz, Christian. 1974. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema Trans. Taylor, Michael. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peyser, Marc. 1995. Don't “Chat” To Strangers. Newsweek, 19 June.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1988. Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1996. The Essential Holmes: Selections from the Letters, Speeches, and Judicial Opinions of Oliver Wendell Holmes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nico. 1979. State, Power, Socialism Trans. Camiller, Patrick. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas, eds. 1991. The Fate of law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in General Linguistics Trans. Baskin, Wade. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian. 1996. The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Story, John. 1993. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Waugh, Patricia. 1984. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-conscious Fiction. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Richard. 1984. The Failure of the Word: The Lawyer as Protagonist in Modern Fiction. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1985. Authority, Autonomy, and Choice: The Role of Consent in the Moral and Political Visions of Franz Kafka and Richard Posner. Harvard Law Review 99: 384–428.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1993. Narrative, Authority, and the Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1987. Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1973. The Legal Imagination. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
White, James Boyd. 1984. When Words Lose Their Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1961. Tractatus Logico Philosophicus Trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1997. Philosophical Investigations Trans. Elizabeth, G. Anscombe, M. London: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara. 1993. Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar