Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T18:57:09.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victorious Transsexuals in the Courtroom: A Challenge for Feminist Legal Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Anna Kirkland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transsexual and transgendered people, despite their exclusion from most civil rights laws, nonetheless occasionally prevail as plaintiffs in litigation. What should feminist legal theorists make of these victories? The theory one uses to win has implications for future conceptions of gender and sexuality in the law as well as for understanding contemporary conflicts and alliances among sex and gender theorists, lawyers, and activists. Conflicting theories of how to ground law's liberation claims abound, however. Evidence suggests that transsexuals secure legal victories only through a disheartening process of medicalization, normalization, and demonstration of traditional sex and gender role adherence. Recent cases, however, reveal some interesting destabilizations in law's account of the transsexual, and they provide critical legal scholars with a new perspective on rights-claiming as a liberation strategy. Attention to the diversity of transsexual and transgendered priorities as well as to the properties of the legal process shows feminist legal theorists how to navigate the problems of identity construction and legal protection raised here sympathetically but unromantically.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). 4th ed. Washington, D. C.: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bornstein, Kate 1994. Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Bower, Lisa C. 1994. Queer Acts and the Politics of “Direct Address”: Rethinking Law, Culture, and Community. Law & Society Review 28: 1009–38.Google Scholar
Brown, Mildred L., and Rounsley, Chloe Ann. 1996. True Selves: Understanding Transsexualism–Far Families, Friends, Coworkers, and Helping Professionals. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin 1987. Victims in the Shadow of the Law: A Critique of the Model of Legal Protection. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12: 421–39.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith 2000. Appearances Aside. California Law Review 88: 55–63.Google Scholar
Califia, Pat 1997, Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne C. 1995. Disaggregating Gender from Sex and Sexual Orientation: The Effeminate Man in the Law and Feminist Jurisprudence. Yale Law Journal 105: 1–105.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne C. 1998. Unpacking Package Deals: Separate Spheres Are Not the Answer. Denver University Law Review 75: 1305–20.Google Scholar
Coombs, Mary 1998. Sexual Dis-Orientation: Transgendered People and Same-Sex Marriage. University of California, Los Angeles Women's Law Journal 8: 219–66.Google Scholar
Corbett, Sara 2001. When Debbie Met Christina, Who Then Became Chris: Does a Sex Change Mean the End of a Relationship New York Times Magazine, 14 October, 84–87.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1988. Race, Reform, and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law. Harvard Law Review 101: 1331–87.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leslie 1996. Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine 1995. The Central Mistake of Antidiscrimination Law: The Disaggre-gation of Sex from Gender. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 1–99.Google Scholar
Garet, Ronald R. 1991. Self-Transformability. Southern California Law Review 65: 121–203.Google Scholar
Green, James 2000. Introduction. In Transgender Equality: A Handbook for Activists and Policymakers, ed. Currah, Paisley and Minter, Shannon. New York: Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet 1989. The Politics of the Closet: Towards Equal Protection for Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Identity. University of California, Los Angeles Law Review 36: 915–76.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet 1996. Introduction: Sexuality, Cultural Tradition, and the Law. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 8: 93–104.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet 2000. “Like Race Arguments. In What's Left of Theory? New Work on the Politics of Literary Theory, ed. Butler, Judith, Guillory, John, and Thomas, Kendall. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Angela 1990. Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review 42: 581–616.Google Scholar
Holt, Kristine W. 1997. Reevaluating Holloway: Title VII, Equal Protection, and the Evolution of a Transgender Jurisprudence. Temple Law Review 70: 283–319.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kevin R. 1998. Race, the Immigration Laws, and Domestic Race Relations: A “Magic Mirror” into the Heart of Darkness. Indiana Law Journal 73: 1111–59.Google Scholar
Minter, Shannon 2000. Do Transsexuals Dream of Gay Rights? Getting Real about Transgender Inclusion in the Gay Rights Movement. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 17: 589–621.Google Scholar
Morris, Jan 1974. Conundrum. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Nevins, Jennifer L. 1998. Getting Dirty: A Litigation Strategy for Challenging Sex Discrimination Law by Beginning with Transsexualism. New York University Review of Law and Social Change 24: 383–418.Google Scholar
Patterson, Charlotte J. 1995a. Adoption of Minor Children by Lesbian and Gay Adults: A Social Science Perspective. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 2: 191–205.Google Scholar
Patterson, Charlotte J. 1995b. Families of the Lesbian Baby Boom: Parents' Division of Labor and Children's Adjustment. Developmental Psychology 31: 115–23.Google Scholar
Queen, Carol, and Schimel, Lawrence, eds. 1997. PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Janice G. 1980. The Transsexual Empire: The Making of the She-Male. London: Women's Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki 1992. Women “Before” the Law: Judicial Stories about Women, Work, and Sex Segregation on the Job. In Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Butler, Judith, and Scott, Joan W., 297–338. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, D. Travers 1997. Le Freak, C'est Chic! Le Fag, Quelle Drag! Celebrating the Collapse of Homosexual Identity. In Queen and Schimel 1997.Google Scholar
Shafiqullah, Hasan 1997. Shape-Shifters, Masqueraders, and Subversives: An Argument for the Liberation of Transgendered Individuals. Hastings Women's Law Journal 8: 195–227.Google Scholar
Stuart, Kim Elizabeth. 1991. The Uninvited Dilemma: A Question of Gender. Portland, Oreg.: Metamorphous Press.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, Debra Sherman. 1995. The Predicament of the Transsexual Prisoner. Tempk Political and Civil Rights Law Review 5: 27–47.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1984. An Essay on Rights. Texas Law Review 62: 1363–403.Google Scholar
Valdes, Francisco 1995. Queers, Sissies, Dykes, and Tomboys: Deconstructing the Conflation of “Sex”, “Gender”, and “Sexual Orientation” in Euro-American Law and Society. California Law Review 83: 1–377.Google Scholar
Society. 1996. Unpacking Hetero-Patriarchy: Tracing the Conflation of Sex, Gender, and Sexual Orientation to its Origins. Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 8: 161–211.Google Scholar
Society. 1997. Acts of Power, Crimes of Knowledge: Some Observations on Desire, Law, and Ideology in the Politics of Expression at the End of the Twentieth Century. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice 1: 213–50.Google Scholar
Walters, Suzanna 1996. From Here to Queer: Radical Feminism, Postmodernism, and the Lesbian Menace (Or, Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Fag?). Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 21: 830–69.Google Scholar
Wilchins, Riki Anne. 1997a. Read My Lips: Sexual Subversion and the End of Gender. Ithaca, N. Y.: Firebrand Books.Google Scholar
Wilchins, Riki Anne. 1997b. Lines in the Sand, Cries of Desire. In Queen and Schimel.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia 1987. Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructed Rights. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 22: 401–33.Google Scholar

Statutes and Cases

Americans with Disabilities Act § 3(2), 42 U. S. C. A. § 12102(2) (1990).Google Scholar
B. v. Lackner, 80 Cal. App. 3d 64 (1978).Google Scholar
Bottoms v. Bottoms, 249 Va. 410, 457 S. E.2d 102 (1995).Google Scholar
Broadus v. State Farm Insurance, 2000 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 19919.Google Scholar
Christian v. Randall, 33 Colo. App. 12 (1973).Google Scholar
Daly v. Daly, 715 P.2d 56 (1986).Google Scholar
Davidson v. Aetna Life and Casualty Ins., 101 Misc. 2d 1, 420 N. Y. S. 2d 450 (1979).Google Scholar
Doe v. Yunits, 2001 Mass. Super. LEXIS 327 (2001).Google Scholar
Enriquez v. West Jersey Health Systems, 777 A.2d 365 (2001).Google Scholar
Geovanni Hernandez-Montiel v. INS, 225 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Hate Crimes Statistics Act, 28 U. S. C. S. § 534 (Law. Co-op. 1996).Google Scholar
In the Matter of Richard Clark Makney, 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3550 (Aug. 13, 2001).Google Scholar
J. L. S. v. D. K. S./S. K. S., 943 S. W.2d 766 (1997).Google Scholar
Littleton v. Prange, 9 S. W. 3d 223(1999).Google Scholar
Miles v. New York University, 979 F. Supp. 248 (1997).Google Scholar
Pinneke v. Preisser, 623 F.2d 546 (1980).Google Scholar
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U. S. 228 (1989).Google Scholar
Rentos v. Oce Office Systems, 1996 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 19060 (S. D. N. Y. 1996).Google Scholar
Rosa v. Park West Bank and Trust, 214 F.3d 213 (2000).Google Scholar
Sanchez-Trujillo v. INS, 801 F.2d 1571 (1986).Google Scholar
Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Smith v. Rasmussen, 249 F.3d 755 (2001).Google Scholar
Ulane v. Eastern Airlines 581 F. Supp. 821 (1983).Google Scholar