Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:54:07.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same‐Sex Marriage into the Public Arena

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Michael C. Dorf  and
Sidney Tarrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since the 1980s, social movement scholars have investigated the dynamic of movement/countermovement interaction. Most of these studies posit movements as initiators, with countermovements reacting to their challenges. Yet sometimes a movement supports an agenda in response to a countermovement that engages in what we call “anticipatory countermobilization.” We interviewed ten leading LGBT activists to explore the hypothesis that the LGBT movement was brought to the fight for marriage equality by the anticipatory countermobilization of social conservatives who opposed same‐sex marriage before there was a realistic prospect that it would be recognized by the courts or political actors. Our findings reinforce the existing scholarship, but also go beyond it in emphasizing a triangular relationship among social movement organizations, countermovement organizations, and grassroots supporters of same‐sex marriage. More broadly, the evidence suggests the need for a more reciprocal understanding of the relations among movements, countermovements, and sociolegal change.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 449 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alimi, Eitan, and Hirsch‐Hoefler, Sivan 2012. Structure of Political Opportunities and Threats and Movement‐Countermovement Interaction in Segmented Composite Regimes. Comparative Politics 44 (3): 331–349.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2005. Out of the Closets and into the Courts. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Kenneth T. 2002. Movement‐Countermovement Dynamics and the Emergence of New Institutions: The Case of “White Flight” Schools in Mississippi. Social Forces 80 (3): 911–936.Google Scholar
Austin, Andrew. 2002. Advancing Accumulation and Managing Its Discontents: The U.S. Anti‐Environmental Countermovement. Sociological Spectrum 22 (1): 71–105.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2011. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Mary, and Taylor, Verta, eds. 2013. The Marrying Kind: Debating Same‐Sex Marriage Within the Lesbian and Gay Movement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Blok, Anders. 2008. Contesting Global Norms: Politics of Identity in Japanese Pro‐Whaling Countermobilization. Global Environmental Politics 8 (2): 39–66.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2010. Mobilizing in the Shadow of the Law: Lesbian and Gay Rights in the Aftermath of Bowers v. Hardwick . Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 31:175–205.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2013. Lawyering for Social Change: Pro Bono Publico, Cause Lawyering and the Social Movement Society. Mobilization 18 (2): 179–196.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A., and Stobaugh, James E. 2013. Law and Social Movements. In The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, ed. Snow, David A., Della Porta, Donatella, Klandermans, Bert, and McAdam, Doug, Vol. 2, 683–687. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown‐Nagin, Tomiko. 2005. Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action. Columbia Law Review 105 (5): 1436–1528.Google Scholar
Budros, Art. 2011. Explaining the First Emancipation: Social Movements and Abolitions in the US North, 1776–1804. Mobilization 16 (4): 439–454.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. 1999. Making Up Emotional People: The Case of Romantic Love. In The Passions of Law, ed. Bandes, Susan A., 217–240. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2009. Fathers’ Rights Groups, Domestic Violence and Political Countermobilization. Social Forces 88 (2): 723–756.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., and NeJaime, Douglas 2010. Lawyering for Marriage Equality. UCLA Law Review 57 (5): 1235–1331.Google Scholar
de Fazio, Gianluca. 2012. Legal Opportunity Structure and Social Movement Strategy in Northern Ireland and Southern United States. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 53 (1): 3–22.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella, and Diani, Mario 1999. Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dixon, Marc 2008. Movements, Countermovements and Policy Adoption: The Case of Right‐to‐Work Activism. Social Forces 87 (1): 473–500.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. 2011. Same‐Sex Marriage, Second‐Class Citizenship, and Law's Social Meaning. Virginia Law Review 97 (6): 1267–1346.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. The Forum of Principle. New York University Law Review 56:469–518.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American cities. American Political Science Review 67 (1): 11–28.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2001. Channeling: Identity‐Based Social Movements and Public Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 150 (1): 419–525.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2002. Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fetner, Tina. 2008. How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998. Building the Cold War Consensus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Meyer, David S. 1996. Framing Political Opportunity. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N., 275–290. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerstmann, Evan. 2008. Same‐Sex Marriage and the Constitution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Google. n.d. Google Books Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=homosexual+marriage%2Cgay+marriage%2Csame‐sex+marriage&year_start=1990&year_end=2008&corpus=17&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Chomosexual%20marriage%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Cgay%20marriage%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2Csame%20‐%20sex%20marriage%3B%2Cc0 (accessed December 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jack. 1968. The Supreme Court, Civil Rights and Civil Dissonance. Yale Law Journal 77 (8): 1520–1544.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 2009. Courting the People: Demosprudence and the Law/Politics Divide. Boston University Law Review 89 (2): 539–561.Google Scholar
Hajjar, Lisa. 2010. Lawyers, Litigation, and the U.S. Anti‐Torture Campaign. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2002. New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 238–255.Google Scholar
Human Rights Campaign n.d. HRC Story. http://www.hrc.org/the‐hrc‐story/annual‐reports (accessed July 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. 2009. Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights. Law & Society Review 43 (1): 151–186.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 2012. From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same‐Sex Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud. 2004. Protest in Time and Space: The Evolution of Waves of Contention. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter, 19–46. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. The Political Opportunity Structure of the New Social Movements: Its Impact on Their Mobilization. In The Politics of Social Protest, ed. Jenkins, J. Craig and Klandermans, Bert, 167–198. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lo, Clarence Y. H. 1982. Countermovements and Conservative Movements in the Contemporary U.S. Annual Review of Sociology 8:107–134.Google Scholar
Loftus, Jeni. 2001. America's Liberalization in Attitudes Toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review 66 (5): 762–782.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mayeri, Serena. 2004. Constitutional Choices: Legal Feminism and the Historical Dynamics of Change. California Law Review 92 (3): 755–839.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug 1983. Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency. American Sociological Review 48 (6): 735–754.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug 1999. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 2006. Law and Social Movements. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., Jenness, Valerie, and Ingram, Helen 2005. Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy in America. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne 1996. Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1628–1660.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Staggenborg, Suzanne 1998. Countermovement Dynamics in Federal Systems: A Comparison of Abortion Politics in Canada and the United States. Research in Political Sociology 8:209–240.Google Scholar
Munro, Lyle. 1999. Contesting Moral Capital in Campaigns Against Animal Liberation. Society and Animals 7 (1): 35–53.Google Scholar
Peleg, Samuel. 2000. Peace Now or Later? Movement‐Countermovement Dynamics and the Israeli Political Cleavage. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 23 (4): 235–254.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center Religion and Public Life Project. 2012. Changing Attitudes About Same‐Sex Marriage. http://features.pewforum.org/same‐sex‐marriage‐attitudes/slide2.php (accessed December 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Prabhat, Devyani. 2011. After 9/11: Guantánamo and the Mobilization of Lawyers. Studies in Law, Politics and Society 54:213–259.Google Scholar
Riddell, Troy Q. 2004. The Impact of Legal Mobilization and Judicial Decisions: The Case of Minority‐Language Education Policy in Canada for Francophones Outside Quebec. Law & Society Review 38 (3): 583–609.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1987. Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics Since Independence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rohlinger, Dina A. 2002. Framing the Abortion Debate: Organizational Resources, Media Strategies, and Movement‐Countermovement Dynamics. Sociological Quarterly 43 (4): 479–507.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 1974. Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2008. Dead or Alive: Originalism as Popular Constitutionalism in Heller. Harvard Law Review 122 (1): 191–245.Google Scholar
Stone, Amy L. 2012. Gay Rights at the Ballot Box. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Amy L. 2013. Winning for LGBT Rights Laws, Losing for Same‐Sex Marriage: The LGBT Movement and Campaign Tactics. In The Marrying Kind: Debating Same‐Sex Marriage Within the Lesbian and Gay Movement, ed. Bernstein, Mary and Taylor, Verta, 135–166. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta, Van Dyke, Nella, Kimport, Katrina, and Andersen, Ellen Ann 2009. Culture and Mobilization: Tactical Repertoires, Same‐Sex Weddings, and the Impact on Gay Activism. American Sociological Review 74 (6): 865–886.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK. Law & Society Review 46 (3): 523–556.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2013. Prejudice Before Pride: Rise of an Anticipatory Countermovement. In Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, ed. Weiss, Meredith L. and Bosia, Michael J., 149–173. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
White House. 2012. Remarks of President Obama at a Campaign Event in Seattle, WA. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the‐press‐office/2012/05/10/remarks‐president‐campaign‐event‐seattle‐wa (accessed December 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d. Same‐Sex Marriage Status in the United States by State. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same‐sex_marriage_status_in_the_United_States_by_state (accessed December 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Yang, Alan S. 1997. Trends: Attitudes Toward Homosexuality. Public Opinion Quarterly 61 (3): 477–507.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N., and Useem, Bert 1987. Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization, Tactics, and State Involvement. In Social Movements in an Organizational Society, ed. Zald, Mayer N. and McCarthy, John David, 247–271. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44 (1993).Google Scholar
Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972).Google Scholar
Baker v. State, 744 A.2d 864 (1999).Google Scholar
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).Google Scholar
Garden State Equality v. Dow, 79 A.3d 1036 (NJ 2013).Google Scholar
Goodridge v. Department of Pub. Health, 798 N.E.2d 941 (2003).Google Scholar
Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S. Ct. 2652 (2013).Google Scholar
In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.2d 384 (Cal. 2008).Google Scholar
Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407 (Conn. 2008).Google Scholar
Kitchen v. Herbert, ___ F.Supp.2d ___, 2013 WL 6697874 (D. Utah, Dec. 20, 2013).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Wymyslo, ___ F.Supp.2d ___, 2013 WL 6726688 (S.D. Ohio, Dec. 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F. Supp. 2d 921 (N.D. Cal. 2010).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).Google Scholar
United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013).Google Scholar
Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C (1996).Google Scholar