We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Alexander, Gregory S.1996. Ten Years of Takings. Journal of Legal Education46: 586–95.Google Scholar
Black's Law Dictionary. 1990. 6th ed. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Blume, Lawrence E., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.1984. Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis. California Law Review72: 569–628.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed., A. Douglas1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review85: 1089–1128.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald A.1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics3: 1–44.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D.1985. Unity in Tort, Contract, and Property: The Model of Precaution. California Law Review73: 1–51.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., and Ulen, Thomas S.1997. Law and Economics. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C.1986. Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review38: 623–87.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C.1996. Takings Legislation: A Comment. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy20: 75–84.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1991. Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures. Virginia Law Review77: 833–79.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A.1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1986. An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions. Harvard Law Review99: 509–617.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell. 1995. Policymaking and the Offer/Asking Price Gap: Toward a Theory of Efficient Entitlement Allocation. Stanford Law Review46: 663–708.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 1990. Just Compensation and Just Politics. Connecticut Law Review22: 285–322.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas. 1986. The Economics of Public Use. Cornell Law Review72: 61–116.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I.1967. Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law. Harvard Law Review80: 1165–1258.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I.1987. Takings, 1987. Columbia Law Review88: 1600–1629.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey. 1997. Gains, Losses, and the Psychology of Litigation. Southern Califomia Law Review70: 113–85.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M.1984. Mohan Reconsidered: Why the Takings Issue Is Still a Muddle. Southern California Law Review57: 561–99.Google Scholar
Rubinfield, Jed.1993. Yak Law Journal102: 1077–1163.Google Scholar
Sax, Joseph. 1964. Takings and the Police Power. Yale Law Journal74: 36–76.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1997. Analysis of Law. Working paper no. 46 (2d ser.), John M. Olin Progra. In Law and Economics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar