Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:17:25.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Social Life of Regulation in Taipei City Hall: The Role of Legality in the Administrative Bureaucracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article explores the role of legality in conceptions of state and society among bureaucrats in the Taipei, Taiwan city government. When administrators confront the global arena, the existence of law emblematizes modernity and the ability to participate in the international system. In interactions among administrators, law is laden with impossible ideals and fraught with assumptions of hypocrisy. In dealings with people outside the government, legality often signals the breakdown of other, more valuable social norms. Far from legitimating administrative action, legality itself is legitimated by reference to the same values as other social action: it is held up to an ideal of consensus and cultural coherence and judged by its ability to fulfill obligations and nurture relationships. Law does not hegemonically structure administrators’ conceptions of state and society. Rather, it defines one aspect of governance at the margins of legitimacy, dependent on justification through other ethical norms.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrow, Martin. 1970. Bureaucracy. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Allen, Joseph. 2000. Reading Taipei: Cultural Traces in a Cityscape. Harvard Studies on Taiwan: Papers of the Taiwan Studies Workshop 3:123.Google Scholar
Allen, Joseph. 2005. Mapping Taipei: Representation and Ideology, 1626–1945. Studies on Asia Series III 2 (2): 5980.Google Scholar
Amsden, Alice. 1985. The State and Taiwan's Economic Development. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Peter, B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1959. The Human Condition: A Study of the Central Dilemmas Facing Modern Man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Anya. 2007. Why “Taiwan is Too Democratic”: Legitimation, Administration, and Political Participation in Taipei. PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Bishai, Martha Fitzpatrick. 1991. The Development of Industrial Land in Taiwan: A Legal Framework for State Control. Journal of Developing Areas 26:5364.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1963. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bosco, Joseph. 1992. Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, and the State in Local Politics. Ethnology 31 (2): 157–84.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1995. Rites of Institution. In Language and Symbolic Power, ed. Thompson, John B. Trans. Raymond, Gino and Adamson, Matthew, 117–26. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burchell, Graham, Colin, Gordon, and Peter, Miller, eds. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Han‐Yu, and Ramon, H. Myers. 1963. Japanese Colonial Development Policy in Taiwan, 1895–1906: A Case of Bureaucratic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Asian Studies 22 (4): 433–49.Google Scholar
Chang, Ly‐Yun, Lu, Yu‐Hsia, and Wang, Fu‐Chang, eds. 1997.[Taiwanese Society in the 1990s: Taiwan Social Change Survey Symposium Series 2 (Part 1)]. Taipei:[The Preparatory Office of the Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica].Google Scholar
Chang, Mau‐kuei. 1994. Toward an Understanding of the Sheng‐Chi Wen‐Ti in Taiwan: Focusing on Changes After Political Liberalization. In Ethnicity in Taiwan: Social, Historical, and Cultural Perspectives, ed. Chen, Chung‐min, Chuang, Ying‐chang, and Huang, Shu‐min, 93150. Taipei: Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Chao, Linda, and Ramon, H. Meyers. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Albert H. Y. 1999. Towards a Legal Enlightenment: Discussion in Contemporary China on the Rule of Law. Pacific Basin Law Journal 17:125–65.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard, ed. 1987. The Census, Social Structure, and Objectification in South Asia. In An Anthropologist Among the Historians and Other Essays, 224–54. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Comaroff, Jean. 1992. Ethnography and the Historical Imagination. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Corcuff, Stephane. 2000. Taiwan's “Maindlanders”: A New Ethnic Category. China Perspectives 28:7181.Google Scholar
Corcuff, Stephane. ed. 2002. Memories of the Future: National Identity Issues and the Search for a New Taiwan. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. 1984. The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sectors, Product Cycles and Political Consequences. International Organization 38 (1): 140.Google Scholar
Du Gay, Paul. 2000. In Praise of Bureaucracy: Weber, Organization, Ethics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Duara, Prasenjit. 1988. Superscribing Symbols: The Myth of Guandi, Chinese God of War. Journal of Asian Studies 47 (4): 778–95.Google Scholar
Errington, Joseph. 1995. State Speech for Peripheral Publics in Java. Pragmatics 5 (2): 213–24.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, Robert. 2005. Taiwan: A Periphery in Search of a Narrative. Journal of Asian Studies 64 (2): 281–94.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, Eric A. 2000. The Ritual of Rights in Japan: Law, Society, and Health Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Two Lectures. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, Colin, 78108. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Gordon, Colin, Burchell, Graham, and Miller, Peter, 87104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1991. Bartok's Funeral: Representations of Europe in Hungarian Political Rhetoric. American Ethnologist 18:440–58.Google Scholar
Gladney, Dru C. 1993. Representing Nationality in China: Refiguring Majority/Minority Identities. Journal of Asian Studies 53 (1): 92123.Google Scholar
Gold, Thomas B. 1986. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1991. How Should We Do the History of Statistics? In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Gordon, Colin, Burchell, Graham, and Miller, Peter, 181–96. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. Making Up People. In The Science Studies Reader, ed. Biagioli, Mario. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Handelman, Don. 2004. Nationalism and the Israeli State: Bureaucratic Logic in Public Events. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1992. The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. 1968. Agricultural Transformation under Colonialism: The Case of Taiwan. Journal of Economic History 28 (3): 313–40.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. 1971. The Development of Japanese Colonial Government in Taiwan, 1895–1945. In Government and Economic Development, ed. Ranis, Gustaf, 287328. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. 1978. Economic Development of Taiwan, 1860–1970. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ho, Samuel P. S. 1987. Economics, Economic Bureaucracy and Taiwan's Economic Development. Pacific Affairs 20:226–47.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Wuda. 1998. Rizhishidai (1895–1945) Taibeishi Zhi Jindai Dushijihua(1895–1945)[Contemporary Taipei City Planning in Japanese Colonial Age (1895–1945).][Banchiao City]:[Taiwan Urban History Research Center].Google Scholar
Huang, Yuyuan. 1983. Taibeishi Fazhanshi. [Taipei Urban Development History]. Taipei:[Taipei City Historical Records Committee].Google Scholar
Hull, Matthew S. 2003. Paper Travails: Bureaucracy, Graphic Artifacts, and the Built Environment in the Islamabad Metropolitan Area, 1959–1998. PhD diss., Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
Hwang, Jau‐yuan. 1995. Constitutional Change and Political Transition in Taiwan since 1986—The Role of Legal Institutions. SJD diss., Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lesley A. 2007. Rights and Quarantine during the SARS Global Health Crisis: Differentiated Legal Consciousness in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Toronto. Law & Society Review 41:511–50.Google Scholar
Johnson, Marshall. 1992. Classification, Power, and Markets: The Waning of the Ethnic Division of Labor. In Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle, ed. Simon, Denis Fred and Kau, Michael Y. M., 69100. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Ka, Chih‐ming. 1995. Japanese Colonialism in Taiwan: Land Tenure, Development, and Dependency, 1895–1945. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Perry. 1994. Sources of Order in Chinese Law. American Journal of Comparative Law 42:711–59.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Brian L., and Chun‐Ling, Shen. 2005. The Best of Times and the Worst of Times; Criminal Law Reform in Taiwan. American Journal of Chinese Studies 12 (2): 107–37.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1984. Germany and Republican China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1990. Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943–1958. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24:121–41.Google Scholar
Kuo, Cheng‐tian. 2000. Taiwan's Distorted Democracy in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Asian and African Studies 35 (1): 85111.Google Scholar
Lee, Young‐ho ( Yi, Yeong‐ho). 2004. Colonial Modernity and the Investigation of Land Customs: A Comparison of Japan, Taiwan, and Korea. Korea Journal 44 (2): 149–73.Google Scholar
Lerman, Arthur. 1978. Taiwan's Politics: The Provincial Assemblyman's World. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart. 2005. The New Versus the Old Legal Realism: “Things Ain't What They Used to Be.” Wisconsin Law Review 2005: 365403.Google Scholar
Martin, Jeffrey. 2007. A Reasonable Balance of Law and Sentiment: Social Order in Democratic Taiwan from the Policeman's Point of View. Law & Society Review 41 (3): 665–98.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 1997. Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Ramon H., and Mark, R. Peattie, eds. 1984. The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Steven E. 2003. Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter With Nationalist China, 1945–1950. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1998. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt's Concept of the Social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley. 1999. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley. 2000. Is Taiwan Independence Passé? Public Opinion, Party Platforms and National Identity in Taiwan. Harvard Studies on Taiwan: Papers of the Taiwan Studies Workshop 3 (3): 151–70.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley. 2001. From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Rigger, Shelley. 2006. Taiwan's Rising Rationalism: Generations, Politics and “Taiwanese Nationalism.” Washington, DC: East‐West Center Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. 1999. Two or Three Things I Know About Culture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (3): 399421.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985a. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. Schwab, George. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985b. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Trans. Kennedy, Ellen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2004. Legality and Legitimacy. Trans. Seitzer, Jeffrey. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 2005. After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:323–68.Google Scholar
Tan, Qingshan. 2000. Democratization and Bureaucratic Restructuring in Taiwan. Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (2): 4864.Google Scholar
Taylor, Jay. 2000. The Generalissimo's Son: Chiang Ching‐Kuo and the Revolutions in China and Taiwan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tien, Hung‐mao. 1989. The Great Transformation: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ts'ai, Hui‐Yu Caroline. 2006. Shaping Administration in Colonial Taiwan, 1895–1945. In Taiwan Under Japanese Colonial Rule: 1895–1945, ed. Liao, Ping‐Hui and Wang, David Der‐Wei, 97121. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, Mariana. 2003. Which Side Are You On? Uses of the Everyday in Sociolegal Scholarship. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 26 (1): 8698.Google Scholar
Wang, Horng‐luen. 2004. National Culture and its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan, 1949–2003. Comparative Studies in Society and History 46 (4): 786815.Google Scholar
Wang, Tay‐sheng. 2000. Legal Reform in Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule, 1895–1945: The Reception of Western Law. Seattle: Washington University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Basic Sociological Terms. In Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus, 362. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Winckler, Edwin A. 1981. Roles Linking State and Society. In The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, ed. Ahern, Emily Martin and Gates, Hill, 5088. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Winckler, Edwin A. 1984. Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan: From Hard to Soft Authoritarianism? China Quarterly 99:481–99.Google Scholar
Winn, Jane Kaufman. 1994. Relational Practices and the Marginalization of Law: Informal Financial Practices of Small Businesses in Taiwan. Law & Society Review 28 (2): 193232.Google Scholar
Wong, Timothy Ka‐ying. 2001. From Ethnic to Civic Nationalism: The Formation and Changing Nature of Taiwanese Identity. Asian Perspective 25 (3): 175296.Google Scholar
Wu, Nai‐teh. 1987. The Politics of a Regime Patronage System: Mobilization and Control within an Authoritarian Regime. PhD diss., Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Ye, Qizheng, Huang, Guangguo, Cai, Yuanqi, Lai, Xianzong, and Zhang, Honghui. 2000. “”[“Consensus and Multiplicity” Roundtable].[Thought and Words: Journal of the Humanities and Social Science] 38 (3): 143.Google Scholar
Yeh, Jiunn‐Rong. 2002. Constitutional Reform and Democratization in Taiwan, 1945–2000. In Taiwan's Modernization in Global Perspective, ed. Chow, Peter C. Y., 4778. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jingsen. 1993. Taiwan De Dushijihua 1895–19881895–1988. Taiwan's Urban Planning 1895–1988]. Taipei:[Yeqiang].Google Scholar