No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Putting the Chicago School Debate in Proper Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0897654600010947/resource/name/firstPage-S0897654600010947a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997
References
Crespi, Gregory. 1991. The Mid-Life Crisis of the Law and Economics Movement: Confronting the Problems of Nonfalsifiability and Normative Bias. Notre Dame Law Review
67:231–52.Google Scholar
Crespi, Gregory. 1997. Does the Chicago School Need to Expand Its Curriculum
Law and Social Inquiry
22:149–69.Google Scholar
Dau-Schmidt, Kenneth. 1997. Smoking in the Washroom of the Chicago School: A Reply to Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry
22:171–83.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jeffrey L.
1997. The Chicago School and the Development of a Comprehensive Legal Theory: A Reply to Professor Crespi. Law and Social Inquiry
22:185–89.Google Scholar
Kronman, Anthony. 1980. Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle. 9
joumal of Legal Studies
9:227–42.Google Scholar
Leff, Arthur. 1974. Economic Analysis of Law: Some Realism about Nominalism. Virginia Law Review
60:451–82.Google Scholar
Malloy, Robin Paul, and Braun, Christopher K., eds. 1995. Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Karen. 1994. Austrian Economics in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar