Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:28:49.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Values and Private Lives: Cott, Davis, and Hartog on the History of Marriage Law in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mary Lyndon Shanley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , Autumn 2002 , pp. 923 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bem, Sandra Lipsitz. 1998. An Unconventional Family. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi. 2000. Looking at Marriage. Michigan Law Review 98: 1766–96.Google Scholar
Carbone, June. 1996. Morality, Public Policy and the Family: The Role of Marriage and the Public/Private Divide. Santa Clara Law Review 36: 265–83.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1995. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and other Twentieth-Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtue and Diversity in the Liberal State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Glenda. 1996. Gender and Jim Crow: Women and the Politics of White Supremacy in North Carolina, 1896–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carlonia Press.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991 Rights Talk. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gordon, Sarah Barringer. 2002. The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Graff, E. J. 1999. What Is Marriage for? The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Michael. Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1985.Google Scholar
Harrington, Mona. 1999. Care and Equality. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1998. No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love's Labor. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat de. [1721] 1973. The Persian Letters, trans. Betts, C. J. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Monstesquieu, Charles de Secondat de. [1748] 1989. The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia C., and Stone, Harold S. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1999. A Plea for Difficulty. In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? ed. Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., 105–14. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Polikoff, Nancy D. 1993. We Will Get What We Ask for: Why Legalizing Gay and Lesbian Marriage Will Not “Dismantle the Legal Structure of Gender in Every Marriage. Virginia Law Review 79: 1535–50.Google Scholar
Regan, Milton C. Jr. 1988. Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, Milton C. Jr. 1999. Alone Together: Law and the Meanings of Marriage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1997. Democratic Sex: Reynolds v. U. S., Sexual Relations, and Community. In Sex, Preference, and Family, ed. Estlund, David M. and Nussbaum, Martha C. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanley, Mary Lyndon. 1989. Feminism, Marriage and the Law in Victorian England. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shultz, Marjorie Maguire. 1982. Contractual Ordering of Marriage: A New Model for State Policy. California Law Review 70: 204–334.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1990. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, Carol. 1994. The Way We Live Now: A Discussion of Contracts and Domestic Relations. Utah Law Review 2: 777–815.Google Scholar
Weitzman, Lenore. 1981. Marriage Contract. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Ida B., and Addams, Jane. 1977. Lynching and Rape: An Exchange of Views, ed. Aptheker, Bettina. New York: Ameircan Institute for Marxist Studies.Google Scholar
Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do about It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar