Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:28:42.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Passion, System, and First Amendment Jurisprudence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Sanford Levinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , Summer 1991 , pp. 643 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Although Justice Scalia, with his professed hatred of judicial balancing, may come close to the Blackian position.Google Scholar

2 461 US. 138 (1983).Google Scholar

3 A fine example of the approach that Shiffrin is criticizing is C. Edwin Baker's recent Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

4 406 U.S. 205 (1972).Google Scholar