Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T03:16:57.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Paradox of Justice: From Transitional to Everyday Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2023

Peter Dixon ,
Pamina Firchow  and
Fiorella Vera-Adrianzén
Peter Dixon
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Heller School for Social Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States. Email: [email protected]
Pamina Firchow
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Heller School for Social Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States. Email: [email protected]
Fiorella Vera-Adrianzén
Affiliation:
Post-doctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Transitional justice lacks a coherent framework for articulating the relationship between distributive and corrective justice. Academic debates remain largely normative, focused on whether and how transitional justice should distinguish itself from the realm of the social, economic, and cultural. Where there is a bridge between legal logics and lived realities, it generally happens through victims’ consultation, but these are often thinly designed processes, revolving around questions like “what do victims want” or failing to turn expectations into action. Taking inspiration from Sally Engle Merry’s “paradox of measurement,” in which measurements produce the realities they assess, we pose a “paradox of justice” in which victims’ lived experiences are filtered and reproduced through the technology of consultation. While important, the question of “what do victims want” ultimately oversimplifies the complexities of how injustice is experienced. Drawing on a unique dataset of everyday indicators of justice from Colombia, this article establishes a framework for articulating the experiential dimensions of post-conflict justice. Ultimately, this framework highlights that justice is a process—whether in the courtroom or in a village reckoning with a massacre—and that the kinds of relationships that justice institutions build with victims are of equal relevance to what these institutions ultimately deliver.

Type
Measures of Justice: A Symposium in Honor of Sally Engle Merry (1944–2020)
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 26 - 41
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 3: 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Patricia A., Adler, Peter, and Fontana, Andrea. 1987. “Everyday Life Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 13: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloyo, Eamon, Dancy, Geoff, and Dutton, Yvonne. 2022. “Retributive or Reparative Justice? Explaining Post-Conflict Preferences in Kenya.” Journal of Peace Research, May: 00223433211065573. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211065573.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Björkdahl, Annika, Hall, Martin, and Svensson, Ted. 2019. “Everyday International Relations: Editors’ Introduction.” Cooperation and Conflict 54, no. 2: 123–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836719845834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bundschuh, Thomas. 2015. “Enabling Transitional Justice, Restoring Capabilities: The Imperative of Participation and Normative Integrity.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9, no. 1: 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabal, Patrick. 2012. The End of Conceit: Western Rationality after Postcolonialism. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Elizabeth A, and Firchow, Pamina. 2019. “Reconciliation Barometers: Tools for Postconflict Policy Design.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 13, no. 3: 546–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijz024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuéllar, Alejandro Castillejo, Dixon, Peter, and Firchow, Pamina. 2022. “Opinion: To Build Peace in War-Torn Colombia, We Need to Think Smaller.” Devex (blog). February 11. https://www.devex.com/news/sponsored/opinion-to-build-peace-in-war-torn-colombia-we-need-to-think-smaller-102551.Google Scholar
De Waardt, Mijke, and Weber, Sanne. 2019. “Beyond Victims’ Mere Presence: An Empirical Analysis of Victim Participation in Transitional Justice in Colombia.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 11, no. 1: 209–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huz002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Peter. 2016. “Reparations, Assistance and the Experience of Justice: Lessons from Colombia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10, no. 1: 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Peter, and Firchow, Pamina. 2022. “Collective Justice: Ex-Combatants and Community Reparations in Colombia.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 14, no. 2: 434–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huac030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Peter, and Tenove, Chris. 2013. “International Criminal Justice as a Transnational Field: Rules, Authority and Victims.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 7: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabra-Zamora, Jorge Luis, Molina-Ochoa, Andrés, and Doubleday, Nancy C.. 2021. The Colombian Peace Agreement: A Multidisciplinary Assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairey, Tiffany, Firchow, Pamina, and Dixon, Peter. 2022. “Images and Indicators: Integrating Visual and Non-Visual Participatory Methods to Amplify Community Voices.” Action Research, online first edition.Google Scholar
Firchow, Pamina. 2018. Reclaiming Everyday Peace: Local Voices in Measurement and Evaluation After War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Mac Ginty, Roger. 2020. “Including Hard-to-Access Populations Using Mobile Phone Surveys and Participatory Indicators.” Sociological Methods & Research 49, no. 1: 133–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Selim, Yvette. 2022. “Meaningful Engagement from the Bottom-Up? Taking Stock of Participation in Transitional Justice Processes.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 16, no. 2: 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijab031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1991. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 2021. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Knopf Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark. 2018. “The Myth of Universality: The UNESCO ‘Philosophers’ Committee’ and the Making of Human Rights.” Law & Social Inquiry 43, no. 3: 596–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gready, Paul, and Robins, Simon. 2014. “From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 8, no. 3: 339–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertogh, Marc. 2018. Nobody’s Law: Legal Consciousness and Legal Alienation in Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60397-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highmore, Ben. 2001. Everyday Life and Cultural Theory: An Introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464229.Google Scholar
Jones, Alasdair. 2018. “Everyday without Exception? Making Space for the Exceptional in Contemporary Sociological Studies of Streetlife.” Sociological Review 66, no. 5: 1000–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118771280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Kashif Saeed, and Nyborg, Ingrid L. P.. 2013. “False Promises False Hopes: Local Perspectives on Liberal Peace Building in North-Western Pakistan.” Forum for Development Studies 40, no. 2: 261–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2013.797016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri, and Levich, Christine. 1987. “The Everyday and Everydayness.” Yale French Studies 73: 7–11. https://doi.org/10.2307/2930193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Naomi, and Firchow, Pamina. 2021. “Measuring Peace from the Bottom Up with the Pasto Indigenous Group in Nariño, Colombia.” Political Science & Politics 54, no. 3: 558–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Ginty, Roger. 2021. Everyday Peace: How So-Called Ordinary People Can Disrupt Violent Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, Kieran. 2007. “Beyond Legalism: Towards a Thicker Understanding of Transitional Justice.” Journal of Law and Society 34, no. 4: 411–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2007.00399.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance: With CA Comment by John M. Conley.” Current Anthropology 52, no. S3: 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1086/657241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2016. The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2017. “The Potential of Ethnographic Methods for Human Rights Research.” Research Methods in Human Rights, May. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785367786/9781785367786.00014.xml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2018. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Indicators in Global Governance, edited by Malito, Debora Valentina, Umbach, Gaby, and Bhuta, Nehal, 477–501. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62707-6_21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2019. “Anthropology and the Perils of Quantification.” American Anthropologist 121, no. 1: 270–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, and Wood, Summer. 2015. “Quantification and the Paradox of Measurement: Translating Children’s Rights in Tanzania.” Current Anthropology 56, no. 2: 205–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/680439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Gearoid. 2011. “Local Evaluations of Justice through Truth Telling in Sierra Leone: Postwar Needs and Transitional Justice.” Human Rights Review 12, no. 4: 515–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0195-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Z. 2008. “Effects of Invisibility: In Search of the ‘Economic’ in Transitional Justice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice International Journal of Transitional Justice 2, no. 3: 266–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Colleen. 2017. The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 1997. A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://www.upenn.edu/pennpress/book/1402.html.Google Scholar
Peace Accords Matrix. 2022. “‘Colombia Data Visualizations,’ Peace Accords Matrix Barometer Initiative in Colombia.” https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/barometer/visualizations.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Navarro, Catalina. 2019. “A Feminist Peace in Colombia?—Colombia.” ReliefWeb. https://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/feminist-peace-colombia.Google Scholar
Sargeant, Elise, Barkworth, Julie, and Madon, Natasha S.. 2020. “Procedural Justice in the Criminal Justice System.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice, September 28. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Frederic Charles. 2015. Elucidating Social Science Concepts: An Interpretivist Guide. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selim, Yvette, and Murithi, Tim. 2011. “Transitional Justice and Development: Partners for Sustainable Peace in Africa?” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 6, no. 2: 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2011.141478175834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 2019. “The Every Day Work of Studying the Law in Everyday Life.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15, no. 1: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R. 1989. “The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group-Value Model.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, no. 5: 830–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. 2009. “Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 1166–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldorf, Lars. 2016. “Local Transitional Justice—Customary Law, Healing Rituals, and Everyday Justice.” In An Introduction to Transitional Justice, edited by Simic, Olivera, 157–76. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2011. “Conflict, Security and Development.” Washington, DC: World Bank. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/WDR2011_Full_Text.pdf.Google Scholar