Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:04:35.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oppositional Postmodernism and Globalizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Darian-Smith, Eve 1998. Power in Paradise: The Political Implications of Santos's Utopia. Law ad Social Inquiry 23:81120.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1996. The Illusions of Postmodernism. Oxford, Eng.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1972. Critical Theory. Selected Essays. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1982. The Real World of Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 1995. Toward a New Common Sense. Law, Science, and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa 1997. Toward a Multicultural Conception of Human Rights. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 18:115. Also available in Working Paper Series on Political Economy of Legal Change no. 2 (Dec. 1996), Global Studies Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa Forthcoming. The Fall of the Angelus Novus: Beyond the Modern Game of Roots and Options. Current Sociology. An earlier version of this paper is available in Working Paper Series on Political Economy of Legal Change no. 3 (Dec. 1996), Global Studies Program, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar