Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:42:50.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opening Up Ownership: Community Belonging, Belongings, and the Productive Life of Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Davina Cooper
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing on empirical data and property theory, this article explores the property structure of a “free school” and the work property performs there. At Summerhill, we can see a tension between two property registers. On the one hand, the founder and present members stress the importance of individual ownership; at the same time the school's property regime involves property-limitation rules, a dispersal of rights, collective forms of property, and cross-cutting, pluralized sites of institutional recognition. In exploring how this tension is manifested through property's work, the article focuses on property's contribution to a variegated social life at the school, analyzed in terms of personal, civic, and boundary relations. With belonging treated as the central component of property rather than exclusion or control, ways of understanding what constitutes property and how it works shift.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Summer 2007 , pp. 625 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Gregory. 1998. Property as Propriety. Nebraska Law Review 77:667–702.Google Scholar
Appleton, Matthew. 1993. Summerhill at 70—A Personal Perspective. Friends of Summerhill Trust Journal, Spring: 8.Google Scholar
Appleton, Matthew. 2000. A Free Range Childhood: Self Regulation at Summerhill School. Brandon, VT: The Foundation for Educational Renewal, Inc.Google Scholar
Bell, Abraham, and Parchomovsky, Gideon. 2005. A Theory of Property. Cornell Law Review 90:531–615.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 1997. Property, Pluralism and the Gentrification Frontier. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 12:187–218.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 1998. Landscapes of Property. Law & Society Review 32:567–612.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2004a. The Boundaries of Property: Lessons from Beatrix Potter. Canadian Geographer 48:91–100.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2004b. Un-real Estate: Proprietary Space and Public Gardening. Antipode 36:614–41.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2004c. Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas. 2005. Flowers in the Bathtub: Boundary Crossings at the Public-Private Divide. Geoforum 36:281–96.Google Scholar
Brigham, John, and Diana, Gordon. 1996. Law in Politics: Struggles over Property and Public Space on New York City's Lower East Side. Law & Social Inquiry 21 (2): 265–83.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 1998. Governing Out of Order: Space, Law and the Politics of Belonging. London: Rivers Oram.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 2004. Challenging Diversity: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 2006. “Sometimes a Community and Sometimes a Battlefield”: From the Comedic Public Sphere to the Commons of Speakers’ Corner. Society and Space 24:753–75.Google Scholar
Coşgel, Metin, Murray, John E., and Miceli, Thomas J. 1997 Organization and Distributional Equality in a Network of Communes: The Shakers. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 56:129–44.Google Scholar
Croall, Jonathan. 1983. Neill of Summerhill: The Permanent Rebel. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Darling, John. 1992. A.S. Neill on Democratic Authority: A Lesson from Summerhill? Oxford Review of Education 18:45–57.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret. 1994. Feminist Appropriations: Law, Property and Personality. Social & Legal Studies 3:365–91.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret. 1999. Queer Property, Queer Persons: Self-Ownership and Beyond. Social & Legal Studies 8:327–52.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret, and Naffine, Ngaire. 2001. Are Persons Property? Legal Debates about Property and Personality. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Eleftheriadis, Pavlos. 1996. The Analysis of Property Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16:31–54.Google Scholar
Gray, Kevin. 1991. Property in Thin Air. Cambridge Law Journal 50:252–307.Google Scholar
Grear, Anna. 2003. Theorising the Rainbow? The Puzzle of the Public-Private Divide. Res Publica 9:169–94.Google Scholar
Gribble, David. 1998. Real Education: Varieties of Freedom. Bristol, UK: Libertarian Education.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John. 1986. What Is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 24:1–55.Google Scholar
Grunebaum, James. 1987. Private Ownership. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
The Guardian. 2000. School attacks Ofsted “vandals.” March 21.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1995. Private and Non-Private Property: What Is the Difference? Law Quarterly Review 111:421–44.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1996a. Property and Justice Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. 1996b. Who Owns My Body. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16:55–84.Google Scholar
Heller, Michael. 1998. The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review 111:621–88.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Ray. 1972. Fifty Years of Freedom. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Jacobs, June. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1972. Commitment and Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, ed. 1973. Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, Martha-Marie, and Macdonald, Roderick. 1997. What Is a Critical Legal Pluralism? Canadian Journal of Law and Society 12:25–46.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, Hilke. 2000. The Illusion of Permanence: Work Motivation and Membership Turnover at Twin Oaks Community. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3:157–71.Google Scholar
Kumar, Krishan. 1997. Home: The Promise and Predicament of Private Life at the End of the Twentieth Century. In Public and Private in Thought and Practice, ed. Weintraub, Jeff and Kumar, Krishan, 204–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1964. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manderson, Desmond. 1996. Beyond the Provincial: Space, Aesthetics, and Modernist Legal Theory. Melbourne University Law Review 20:1049–71.Google Scholar
Mason, J. Kenyon, and Laurie, Graeme. 2001. Consent or Property? Dealing with the Body and Its Parts in the Shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey. Modern Law Review 64:710–29.Google Scholar
Maurer, Bill. 2003. Comment: Got Language? Law, Property, and the Anthropological Imagination. American Anthropologist 105:775–81.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally. 1988. Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review 5:869–96.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Bill. 1995 From Utopian Dreaming to Communal Reality: Cooperative Lifestyles in Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Leslie, Skeggs, Beverley, Tyrer, Paul, and Corteen, Karen. 2001. Property, Boundary, Exclusion: Making Sense of Hetero-Violence in Safer Spaces. Social & Cultural Geography 2:407–20.Google Scholar
Munzer, Stephen. 1990. A Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Naffine, Ngaire. 1998. The Legal Structure of Self-Ownership: Or the Self-Posssessed Man and the Woman Possessed. Journal of Law and Society 25:193–212.Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1990. Law, Boundaries, and the Bounded Self. Representations 30:162–89.Google Scholar
Neill, A. S. 1937. That Dreadful School. London: Herbert Jenkins Ltd.Google Scholar
Neill, A. S. 1948. Hearts Not Heads in the School. London: Herbert Jenkins.Google Scholar
Neill, A. S. 1968a. Summerhill. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.Google Scholar
Neill, A. S. 1968b. Talking of Summerhill. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
OFSTED (Office for Standards in Education) Report, Summerhill School. 1999. http://www.summerhill.paed.com/summ/ofsted.htm (accessed April 17, 2007).Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Penner, James. 1997. The Idea of Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Popenoe, Joshua. 1970. Inside Summerhill. New York: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret. 1986. Residential Rent Control. Philosophy & Public Affairs 15:350–80.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret. 1993. Reinterpreting Property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret. 1995. What, if Anything, Is Wrong with Baby Selling? Pacific Law Journal 26:135–45.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret. 1996. Contested Commodities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, Adam. 1986. Property. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles. 1964. The New Property. Yale Law Journal 73:733–87.Google Scholar
Report of an Inquiry into Summerhill School—Leiston, Suffolk, January 2000, (Part One). http://www.selfmanagedlearning.org/Summerhill/RepMain.htm (accessed April 17, 2007).Google Scholar
Rigby, Andrew. 1974. Communes in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol. 1998a. Canons of Property Talk, or, Blackstone's Anxiety. Yale Law Journal 108:601–32.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol. 1998b. The Several Futures of Property: of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems. Minnesota Law Review 83:129–82.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas, eds. 1993. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, 21–61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sargisson, Lucy. 2000. Utopian Bodies and the Politics of Transgression. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schnably, Stephen. 1993. Property and Pragmatism: A Critique of Radin's Theory of Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review 45:347–407.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, Lisa. 2002. Hate Speech, Illocution, and Social Context: A Critique of Judith Butler. Journal of Social Philosophy 33:421–41.Google Scholar
Segefjord, Bjarne. 1971. Summerhill Diary. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Sheller, Mimi, and Urry, John. 2003. Mobile Transformations of “Public” and “Private” Life. Theory, Culture & Society 20:107–25.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph, and Beerman, Jack. 1993. The Social Origins of Property. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 6:217–48.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1976. Walden Two. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Spiro, Melford. 1963. Kibbutz: Venture in Utopia. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 1994. Private Lives, Secluded Places: Privacy as Political Possibility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12:387–401.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 2004. Losing (Out On) Intellectual Resources. In Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social, ed. Pottage, Alain and Mundy, Martha, 201–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian. 1993. The Folly of the “Social Scientific” Concept of Legal Pluralism. Journal of Law and Society 20:192–217.Google Scholar
Thornton, Margaret, ed. 1995. Public and Private: Feminist Legal Debates. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Underkuffler, Laura. 2003. The Idea of Property: Its Meaning and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1990. Fetal Fictions: An Exploration of Property Archetypes in Racial and Gendered Contexts. Florida Law Review 42:81–94.Google Scholar
Wright, Gwendolyn. 1991. Prescribing the Model Home. Social Research 58:213–25.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zablocki, Benjamin. 1973. Problems of Anarchism on Hippie Communes. In Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life, ed. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss, 167–77. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar