Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:19:26.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Deterrence Scripts in Australia's Rejuvenated Offshore Detention Regime for Asylum Seekers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Sharon Pickering  and
Leanne Weber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the Global North experiences a real or manufactured crisis in asylum, deterrence has become the central plank in border control policies. Following a resurgence of boat arrivals and faced with serious overcrowding in detention centers and a spate of drownings, the Australian government returned to the use of offshore detention for asylum seekers. In this article, the official media releases of the major political parties from the period surrounding the reopening of detention facilities on Nauru and Papua New Guinea are subject to systematic discourse analysis. This reveals a range of deterrence scripts that we have labeled “neoliberal deterrence,” “classical deterrence,” and an “ethic of care.” The resuscitation of the deterrence script in this second incarnation of Australian offshore processing arguably reveals increasingly nuanced and combative elements. The article details how these scripts make an important contribution to global immigration governance, which is presently incapable of thinking beyond deterrence in its various forms.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , Fall 2014 , pp. 1006 - 1026
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amnesty International. 2012. What We Found on Nauru. Amnesty International, December 17. http://www.amnesty.org.au/refugees/comments/30726/ (accessed June 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). 2012. Human Rights Issues Raised by the Transfer of Asylum Seekers to Third Countries. Canberra: Australian Human Rights Commission. http://www.humanrights.gov.au/human_rights/immigration/transfer_third_countries.html (accessed February 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., and Weisburd, David L. 2012. The Effects of Focussed Deterrence Strategies on Crime: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 49 (2): 323–358.Google Scholar
Burke, A. 2001. Fear of Security. Sydney: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. 2012. Official Committee Hansard Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee—15/10/2012—Estimates—Immigration and Citizenship Portfolio. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Cullen, Simon 2012. Carr Defends Offshore Processing. ABC News Online, November 21. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012‐11‐21/carr‐defends‐success‐of‐offshore‐asylum‐processing/4383828 (accessed June 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Cullen, Francis, Wright, John, and Blevins, Kristie, eds. 2008. Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Evans, Chris 2008. New Directions in Detention: Restoring Integrity to Australia's Immigration System. Speech delivered at the Australian National University, July 29, in Canberra, Australia. http://www.minister.immi.gov.au/media/speeches/2008/ce080729.htm (accessed July 29, 2008).Google Scholar
Houston, Angus, Aristotle, Paris, and L'Estrange, Michael 2012. Report of the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
Innes, Martin, and Thiel, Darren 2008. Policing Terror. In The Handbook of Policing, 2nd ed., ed. Newburn, Tim, 553–579. Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David M. 2009. Deterrence and Crime Prevention: Reconsidering the Prospect of Sanction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kleiman, Mark A. R. 2009. When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Jude, and Pickering, Sharon, eds. 2012. Borders and Crime: Pre‐Crime, Mobility and Serious Harm in an Age of Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nagin, Daniel S. 2012. Imprisonment and Crime Control: Building Evidence Based Policy. In Contemporary Issues in Criminological Theory and Research, ed. Rosenfeld, Richard, Quinet, Kenna, and Garcia, Crystal, 309–316. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
New Matilda. 2013. Please Put Yourselves in Our Shoes. New Matilda, February 7. http://newmatilda.com/2013/02/07/please‐put‐yourselves‐our‐shoes (accessed June 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Phillips, Janet, and Spinks, Harriet 2013. Boat Arrivals in Australia since 1976 (updated January 29, 2013). Canberra: Parliamentary Library, Parliament of Australia. http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BN/2012‐2013/BoatArrivals (accessed June 10, 2013).Google Scholar
Pickering, Sharon J. 2001. Common Sense and Original Deviancy: News Discourses and Asylum Seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies 14 (2): 169–186.Google Scholar
Pickering, Sharon J., and Lambert, Christine 2002. Deterrence: Australia's Refugee Policy. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 14 (1): 65–86.Google Scholar
Pickering, Sharon J., and McCulloch, Jude 2010. The Haneef Case and Counter‐Terrorism Policing in Australia. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research & Policy 20 (1): 21–38.Google Scholar
Pickering, Sharon J., and Weber, Leanne 2012. Hardening the Rule of Law and Asylum Seekers: Exporting Risk and the Judicial Censure of State Illegality. In State Crime and Resistance, ed. Stanley, Elizabeth and McCulloch, Jude, 183–198. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathon 2007. Governing Through Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 2013. UNHCR Mission to Manus Island, Papua New Guinea 15–17 January 2013. Canberra: UNHCR Regional Office. http://unhcr.org.au/unhcr/images/2013‐02‐04%20Manus%20Island%20Report%20Final.pdf (accessed June 23, 2013).Google Scholar
Weber, Leanne 2007. Policing the Virtual Border: Punitive Preemption in Australian Offshore Migration Controls. Social Justice: Special Issue on Transnational Criminology 34 (2): 77–93.Google Scholar
Weber, Leanne, and Pickering, Sharon 2011. Globalization and Borders: Death at the Global Frontier. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weber, Leanne, and Pickering, Sharon Forthcoming. Constructing Voluntarism: Technologies of “Intent Management” in Australian Border Controls. In New Border and Citizenship Politics, ed. Schwenken, H. and Russ, S. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.immi.gov.au/managing‐australias‐borders/border‐security/irregular‐entry/no‐people‐smuggling/_pdf/no‐advantage‐brochure‐english.pdf (accessed June 19, 2013).Google Scholar
Zagare, F. 1996. Classical Deterrence Theory: A Critical Assessment. International Interactions 21 (4): 365–387.Google Scholar