Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:25:58.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Culture and the Politicolegal Opportunity Structure: Explaining Bill of Rights Legal Impact in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

David Erdos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the cultural self‐understandings of the judiciary can exert a profound effect on legal outcomes under a bill of rights. Utilizing the case of New Zealand, it demonstrates that confinement of expansive case law under the New Zealand Bill of Rights (NZBOR) to the criminal law and freedom of expression arenas is most significantly explained by a British‐descended judicial culture that prioritizes, first, those civil liberty values already cognizable by the common law and, second, rights connected with the policing of parliamentary and legal processes. Nevertheless, judicial culture does not operate in a vacuum. Rather, the opportunity structure facing potential public interest litigants under NZBOR depends also on their politicolegal resource set including the attitude of the political branches (legislature and executive) to the claim being forwarded.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Winter 2009 , pp. 95 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allen, James. 1999. The Effect of a Statutory Bill of Rights Where Parliament Is Sovereign: The Lesson from New Zealand. In Sceptical Essays on Human Rights, ed. Campbell, Tom, Ewing, K. D., Tomkins, Adam, 375–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belgrave, Michael, Kawharu, Merata, and Williams, David, eds. 2005. Waitangi Revisited: Perspectives of the Treaty of Waitangi. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bigwood, Rick, ed. 2006. Public Interest Litigation: New Zealand Experience in International Perspective. Wellington: Lexis Nexis NZ.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert. 2002. Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges. Toronto: Vintage Canada.Google Scholar
Butler, Andrew S. 1998. Same‐Sex Marriage and Discrimination. New Zealand Law Journal, June:229–32.Google Scholar
Butler, Andrew, and Butler, Petra. 2005. The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary. Wellington: Lexis Nexis NZ.Google Scholar
Bulter, Petra. 2006. 15 Years of the NZ Bill of Rights: Time to Celebrate, Time to Reflect, Time to Work Harder? Human Rights Research Journal. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/nzcpl/HRRJ/ (accessed April 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Christie, Nigel. 2001. The New Zealand Same‐Sex Marriage Case: From Aotearoa to the United Nations. In Legal Recognition of Same‐Sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, ed. Wintemute, Robert and Andeneas, Mads, 317–35. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1990. A Bill of Rights for Britain, London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Erdos, David. 2007. Aversive Constitutionalism in the Westminster World: The Genesis of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2): 343–69.Google Scholar
Ely, John H. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: a Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1996. Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. American Political Science Review 9 (4): 765–79.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1999. External Pressure and the Supreme Court's Agenda. In Supreme Court Decision‐Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard, 255–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Evans Case, Rhonda. 2006. Enforcing New Zealand's Anti‐Discrimination Law: The State as Public Interest Litigator in New Zealand. In Public Interest Litigation: New Zealand Experience in International Perspective, ed. Bigwood, Rick, 133–60. Wellington: Lexis Nexis NZ.Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. 1994. The Bill of Rights Debate: Democracy or Juristocracy in Britain? In Human Rights and Labour Law: Essays for Paul O'Higgins, ed. Ewing, K. D., Gearty, C. A., and Hepple, B. A., 147–87. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 2004a. Flag Burning Is Not Speech. http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0405/S00463.htm (accessed April 16, 2008).Google Scholar
Franks, Steven. 2004b. Unfranked 29—Paul Barry Hopkinson v. NZ Police http://www.act.org.nz/node/25951?page=3 (accessed September 6, 2008).Google Scholar
Galligan, Brian, and Morton, F. L. 2006. Australian Exceptionalism: Rights Protection Without a Bill of Rights. In Protecting Rights Without a Bill of Rights, ed. Campbell, Tom, Goldsworthy, Jeffrey, and Stone, Adrienne, 17–39. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Geiringer, Claudia. 2006a. Parsing Sir Kenneth Keith's Taxonomy of Human Rights: A Commentary on Illingworth and Evans Case. In Public Interest Litigation: New Zealand Experience in International Perspective, ed. Bigwood, Rick, 179–86. Wellington: Lexis Nexis NZ.Google Scholar
Geiringer, Claudia. 2006b. International Law through the Lens of Zaoui: Where Is New Zealand At? Public Law Review 17:300–21.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1999. The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretative Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision‐Making. In Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Perspectives, ed. Clayton, Cornell and Gillman, Howard, 65–87. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hiebert, Janet. 2005. Rights‐Vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 1:63–102.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2000. “Negative” Rights vs. “Positive” Entitlements: A Comparative Study of Judicial Interpretations of Rights in an Emerging Neo‐Liberal Economic Order. Human Rights Quarterly 22:1060–98.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, K. J. 1985. A Bill of Rights for New Zealand: Judicial Review versus Democracy. New Zealand Universities Law Review 11:307–22.Google Scholar
Keith, K. J. 2000. “Concerning Change”: The Adoption and Implementation of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 31:721–46.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti‐nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–86.Google Scholar
Klug, Francesca, and Starmer, Keir. 2005. Standing Back from the Human Rights Act: How Effective Is It Five Years On? Public Law 2005 (4): 716–28.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Richard. 2003. Right to Counsel. In The New Zealand Bill of Rights, ed. Rishworth, Paul, Hunscroft, Grant, Optican, Scott, and Mahoney, Richard, 524–550. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mark, Gregory A., and Eisgruber, Christopher L. 1988. Law and Political Culture. University of Chicago Law Review 55 (2): 413–27.Google Scholar
Morton, Ted, and Knopff, Rainer. 2000. The Charter Revolution and the Court Party. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
National Business Review. 2007. SFO [Serious Fraud Office] Boss Defends Powers in Parting Shot. October 8. http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/sfo‐boss‐defends‐powers‐parting‐shot (accessed September 6, 2008).Google Scholar
New Zealand Government (Department of Justice). 1985. A Bill of Rights for New Zealand: A White Paper. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
New Zealand Herald. 2007. Peters: Don't Hold Your Breath Waiting for Apology, September 14, A5.Google Scholar
New Zealand Human Rights Commission. 1998. Consistency 2000. http://www.courts.govt.nz/pubs/reports/1998/hrc_consistency/index.html (accessed September 6, 2008).Google Scholar
New Zealand Law Commission. 1998. Defaming Politicians: A Response to Lange v. Atkinson [discussion paper]. Wellington: Law Commission.Google Scholar
New Zealand Law Commission. 2000. Defaming Politicians: A Response to Lange v. Atkinson. Wellington: Law Commission.Google Scholar
New Zealand Parliament. 2001. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
New Zealand Parliament. 2003. Inquiry into the Operation of the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 and related issues http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/BE3F9016‐70A9‐4C9E‐A05E‐4F5F1842C174/13702/DBSCH_SCR_2372_2275.pdf (accessed September 6, 2008).Google Scholar
Optican, Scott. 2008. “Front End/Back End” Adjudication (Rights Versus Remedies) Under Section 21 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. New Zealand Law Review (2008 2: 409–21.Google Scholar
Provine, Doris. 1999. Revolutionizing Rights: Epp's Comparative Perspective. Law & Social Inquiry 24 (4): 1125–40.Google Scholar
Rishworth, Paul. 2006. Human Rights and the Reconstruction of the Moral High Ground. In Public Interest Litigation: New Zealand Experience in International Perspective, ed. Bigwood, Rick, 115–132. Wellington: Lexis Nexis NZ.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. J. 2004. Failing the System? Enforcing the Right to Education in New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 29:735–68.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Hart. 1998. The Short Happy Life and Tragic Death of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. New Zealand Law Review 1998 (2): 259–311.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smillie, John. 2006. Law, Social Policy and the Courts: Who wants Juristocracy? Otago Law Review 11:183–95.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1988. Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law. American Political Science Review 82 (1): 89–108.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2000. The Rights Revolution and Support Structures for Rights Advocacy. Law & Society Review 34 (4): 1203–19.Google Scholar
Stuart, Sarah. 1996. Women and Wife. Sunday Star Times, February 25.Google Scholar
Taggart, Michael. 1998. Tugging on Superman's Cape: Lessons from Experience with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Public Law 1998:266–87.Google Scholar
Tucker, Warren. 2007. Statement by Director of Security concerning Mr Ahmed Zaoui, September 13. http://www.nzsis.govt.nz/pdf/MEDIA.pdf (accessed September 6, 2008).Google Scholar
The Dominion. 1991. Police Fear Cut in Powers. November 15, 7.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.Google Scholar
Attorney-General v. Daniels, [2003] 2 N.Z.L.R. 742.Google Scholar
Attorney-General v. Zaoui, [2005] N.Z.S.C. 38.Google Scholar
Daniels and Ors v. Attorney-General, M1615-SW99, April 3, 2002 (unreported).Google Scholar
Hansen v. The Queen, [2007] 1 N.Z.S.C. 7.Google Scholar
Hopkinson v. Police, [2004] 3 N.Z.L.R. 703 (H.C.).Google Scholar
Howard v. Attorney-General, [2008] N.Z.H.R.R.T. 10.Google Scholar
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 902/1999, U.N. Doc. A/57/40 [2002].Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [1998] 3 N.Z.L.R. 424.Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [2000] 1 N.Z.L.R. 257.Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 385 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Lawson v. Housing New Zealand, [1997] 2 N.Z.L.R. 474.Google Scholar
Lewis v. Wilson and Horton, [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 546.Google Scholar
Living World Distributors Ltd v. Human Rights Action Group Inc (Wellington), [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 570.Google Scholar
Martin v. Tauranga District Court, [1995] 2 N.Z.L.R. 419 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Ministry of Transport v. Noort; Police v. Curran, [1992] 3 N.Z.L.R. 260 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Moonen v. Film and Literature Board of Review, [2000] 2 N.Z.L.R. 9 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Moonen v. Film and Literature Board of Review (No. 2), [2002] 2 N.Z.L.R. 754 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Quilter v. Attorney-General, [1996] N.Z.F.L.R. 481.Google Scholar
Quilter v. Attorney-General, [1998] 1 N.Z.L.R. 523.Google Scholar
R. v. Grayson & Taylor, [1997] 1 N.Z.L.R. 399.Google Scholar
R. v. Kirifi, [1992] 2 N.Z.L.R. 8 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Jefferies, [1994] 1 N.Z.L.R. 290 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Laugalis, [1993] 10 C.R.N.Z. 350 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Phillips, [1991] 3 N.Z.L.R. 175.Google Scholar
R. v. Pora. [2001] 2 N.Z.L.R. 37.Google Scholar
R. v. Poumako, [2000] 2 N.Z.L.R. 695.Google Scholar
R. v Shaheed, [2002] 2 N.Z.L.R. 377 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Williams, [2007] 3 N.Z.L.R. 207.Google Scholar
Simpson v. Attorney-General [Baigent's Case]. [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 667 (1994) (C.A.).Google Scholar
Westco Lagan Ltd v. Attorney-General, [2001] 1 N.Z.L.R. 40.Google Scholar
Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143.Google Scholar
Attorney-General v. Daniels, [2003] 2 N.Z.L.R. 742.Google Scholar
Attorney-General v. Zaoui, [2005] N.Z.S.C. 38.Google Scholar
Daniels and Ors v. Attorney-General, M1615-SW99, April 3, 2002 (unreported).Google Scholar
Hansen v. The Queen, [2007] 1 N.Z.S.C. 7.Google Scholar
Hopkinson v. Police, [2004] 3 N.Z.L.R. 703 (H.C.).Google Scholar
Howard v. Attorney-General, [2008] N.Z.H.R.R.T. 10.Google Scholar
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 902/1999, U.N. Doc. A/57/40 [2002].Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [1998] 3 N.Z.L.R. 424.Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [2000] 1 N.Z.L.R. 257.Google Scholar
Lange v. Atkinson, [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 385 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Lawson v. Housing New Zealand, [1997] 2 N.Z.L.R. 474.Google Scholar
Lewis v. Wilson and Horton, [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 546.Google Scholar
Living World Distributors Ltd v. Human Rights Action Group Inc (Wellington), [2000] 3 N.Z.L.R. 570.Google Scholar
Martin v. Tauranga District Court, [1995] 2 N.Z.L.R. 419 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Ministry of Transport v. Noort; Police v. Curran, [1992] 3 N.Z.L.R. 260 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Moonen v. Film and Literature Board of Review, [2000] 2 N.Z.L.R. 9 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Moonen v. Film and Literature Board of Review (No. 2), [2002] 2 N.Z.L.R. 754 (C.A.).Google Scholar
Quilter v. Attorney-General, [1996] N.Z.F.L.R. 481.Google Scholar
Quilter v. Attorney-General, [1998] 1 N.Z.L.R. 523.Google Scholar
R. v. Grayson & Taylor, [1997] 1 N.Z.L.R. 399.Google Scholar
R. v. Kirifi, [1992] 2 N.Z.L.R. 8 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Jefferies, [1994] 1 N.Z.L.R. 290 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Laugalis, [1993] 10 C.R.N.Z. 350 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Phillips, [1991] 3 N.Z.L.R. 175.Google Scholar
R. v. Pora. [2001] 2 N.Z.L.R. 37.Google Scholar
R. v. Poumako, [2000] 2 N.Z.L.R. 695.Google Scholar
R. v Shaheed, [2002] 2 N.Z.L.R. 377 (C.A.).Google Scholar
R. v. Williams, [2007] 3 N.Z.L.R. 207.Google Scholar
Simpson v. Attorney-General [Baigent's Case]. [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 667 (1994) (C.A.).Google Scholar
Westco Lagan Ltd v. Attorney-General, [2001] 1 N.Z.L.R. 40.Google Scholar

Canada:

Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 241.Google Scholar

United Kingdom:

Chahal v. United Kingdom, [1996] 23 E.H.RR. 413.Google Scholar
Ireland v. United Kingdom, [1978] 2 E.H.R.R. 25.Google Scholar
R. v. Lambert, [2001] UKHL 37, [2002] 2 A.C. 545.Google Scholar
Ramzy v. UK and The Netherlands, [2006] E.C.H.R. 25424/05.Google Scholar
Reynolds v. Times Newspapers. [1998] 3 All E.R. 961.Google Scholar
Soering v. United Kingdom. [1989] 11 E.H.R.R. 439 (ECtHR).Google Scholar
Tyrer v. United Kingdom. [1978] 2 E.H.R.R. 1.Google Scholar

United States:

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S .186 (1986).Google Scholar
Califano v. Westcott, 433 U.S. 2655 (1979).Google Scholar
Kirchberg v. Fennstra, 450 U.S. 455 (1981).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971).Google Scholar
Romer v. Evans, 116 S. Ct. 1620 (1996).Google Scholar
United States v. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities (Vic.) (2006).Google Scholar
Civil Unions Act (2004).Google Scholar
Education Act (1989).Google Scholar
Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Amendment Act (2005).Google Scholar
Flags, Emblems & Names Protection Act (1981).Google Scholar
Human Rights Act (1993).Google Scholar
Human Rights Act (2004) (ACT).Google Scholar
Human Rights Commission Act (1977).Google Scholar
Human Rights Amendment Act (2001).Google Scholar
Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act (2001).Google Scholar
Marriage Act (1955).Google Scholar
Misuse of Drugs Act (1975).Google Scholar
Relationships (Statutory References) Act (2005).Google Scholar
Supreme Court Act (2003).Google Scholar
Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities (Vic.) (2006).Google Scholar
Civil Unions Act (2004).Google Scholar
Education Act (1989).Google Scholar
Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Amendment Act (2005).Google Scholar
Flags, Emblems & Names Protection Act (1981).Google Scholar
Human Rights Act (1993).Google Scholar
Human Rights Act (2004) (ACT).Google Scholar
Human Rights Commission Act (1977).Google Scholar
Human Rights Amendment Act (2001).Google Scholar
Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act (2001).Google Scholar
Marriage Act (1955).Google Scholar
Misuse of Drugs Act (1975).Google Scholar
Relationships (Statutory References) Act (2005).Google Scholar
Supreme Court Act (2003).Google Scholar

Canada:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act (1982).Google Scholar

United Nations:

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1987).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil on Political Rights (1976).Google Scholar

United Kingdom:

Human Rights Act (1998).Google Scholar

Primary Sources:

Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand. National Archives, MS Papers 0600-01, Wellington, NZ.Google Scholar
Bill of Rights papers, Archives New Zealand, Agency ABVP [Ministry of Justice], Series 7410, Accession W5196, Record LEG 7-3-1, Box 13, Part 19 (1989-90), Wellington, NZ.Google Scholar