Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:56:32.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habermas's Constitution: A History, Guide, and Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Section Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor. 1973. Negative Dialectics. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Gregory S., and Skapska, GraZyna, eds. 1994. A Fourth Way? Privatization, Property and the Emergence of New Market Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 1976. Considerations on Western Madsm. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith M. 1992. Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France: Variations on a Theme by Habermas. In Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barenberg, Mark. 1994. Democracy and Domination in the Law of Workplace Cooperation: From Bureaucratic to Flexible Production. Columbia Law Review 94:753983.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald. 1994- Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917- Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1996. The Retrieval of the Democratic Ethos. Cardozo Law Review 17:1127–46.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. ed. 1995. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. ed. 1992. An Allegory of Modernity/Postmodernity: Habermas and Derrida. In The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1987. Revising State Theory: Essays in Poltics and Postindustrialism. Philadelphia: Tempie University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Fred. 1990. Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, Gintis, Herbert, and Gustafsson, Bo, eds. 1993. Markets and Democracy: Participation, Accountability and Efficiency. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. 1995. Democracy and Association. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Estlund, Cynthia. 1997. Freedom of Expression in the Workplace and the Problem of Discriminatory Harassment. Texas Law Review 75:687777.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 1991. Courts, Constitutions, and Labor Politics in England and America: A Study of the Constitutive Power of Law. Law and Social Inquiry 16:134.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 1996. Short-Circuit: A Critique of Habermas's Understanding of Law, Politics, and Economic Life. In Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges: Part II: Law, Politics, Economics, and Rights. Cardozo Law Review 17:12391643.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1972. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Max, Durkheim, and Max Weber. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91:481510.Google Scholar
Green, Philip. 1983. Considerations on the Democratic Division of Labor. Politics and Society 12:430460.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1973. Theory and Practice. Translated by Viertel, J. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Translated by McCarthy, T. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1979. Communication and the Evoluaon of Society. Translated by McCarthy, T. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1983. The German Idealism of the Jewish Philosophers. In Jurgen Habermas, Philosophical Political Profiles. Translated by Lawrence, F. G. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984, 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. 2 vols. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1985. Hannah Arendt: On the Concept of Power. In Jurgen Habermas, Philosophical-Political Profiles. Translated by Lawrence, F. G. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1986. Autonomy and Solidarity: Inteviews with Jürgen Habermas. Edited by Dews, Peter. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1988. Law and Morality: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989a. The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies. In Jurgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader. Edited by Seidman, Steven. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989b. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Burger, T. and Lawrence, F. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Translated by Lenhardt, C. and Nicholsen, S.W. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Translated by Cronin, C. P. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1994 The Past as Future. Translated and edited by Pensky, Max. Lincoln: Uniersity of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1995. Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. Journal of Philosophy 42:109–31.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Trans. Rehg, William. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1990. Law and the Search for Community. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. 1996. Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Empowerment and Privatization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael. 1994. The Project of Reconciliation: Hegeľs Social Philosophy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 21:165257.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1971. Philosophy of Mind. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Edited by Wood, Allen W. and translated by Nisbet, H. B. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1980. Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and Global Order. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1984. Against Parsimony: Three Easy Ways of Complicating Some Categories of Economic Discourse. American Economic Review 74:8996.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1986. Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1995. Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Instituttons: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 1972. Traditional and Critical Theory. In Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Hyde, Alan. 1991. In Defense of Employee Ownership. Chicago-Kent Law Review 67:159211.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1973. The Dialectical Imagination: A Histroy of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 1996. Liberalism's Crooked Circle: Letters to Adam Michnik. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudtcation. Harvard Law Review 89:16851778.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1985. The Role of Law in Economic Thought. American University Law Review 34:9391001.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1993. The Stakes of Law, or Hale and Foucault! In Sexy Dressing, Etc. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Klare, Karl E. 1988. Workplace Democracy and Market Reconstruction: An Agenda for Legal Reform. Catholic University Law Review 38:168.Google Scholar
Landes, Joan. 1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, George. 1961. Marxism: An Historical and Critical Study. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Lukacs, Georg. 1918. Bolshevism as a Moral Problem. Trans, by J. Marcus. Social Research 44:416–24.Google Scholar
Lukacs, Georg. 1971. Reification and the Consciousness of t.ie Proletariat. In History and Class Consciousness Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1964. Early Writings. Trans, by Bottomore, T. B. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1991. Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas. 1996. Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions. Cardozo Law Review 17:10831125.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P. 1997. Max Weber and Jurgen Habermas: The Sociology and Philosophy of Law During Crises of the State. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 9:297344.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1996a. Family Quarrel. Cardozo Law Review 17:1163–78.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1996b. Review of Between Facts and Norms, by Jurgen Habermas. Journal of Philosophy 43:307–15.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1997. What Is Constitutional Democracy? Thomas Sealey Lecture, University of Texas at Austin, School of Law.Google Scholar
Outhwaite, William. 1994. Habermas, a Critical Introduction. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Parricipation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. Sexual Contract. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1947. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Piorre, Michael, and Sabel, Charles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1996. Law's Reason, Review of Between Facts and Norms, by Jurgen Habermas. New Republic, 6 May.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1995. Reply to Habermas. Journal of Philosophy 42:132–80.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roe, Mark J. 1994. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 1982. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. 1985. Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in 19th Century Industrialization. Post and Present 108:133–69.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan eds. 1996. Worlds of Possibility: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scranton, Philip. 1989. Figured Tapestry: Production, Markets, and Power in Philadelphia Textiles, 1885–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Storper, Michael, and Scott, Allen J., eds. 1992. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1996. Dialectics of Modernity: On Critical Theory and the Legacy of Twentieth-Century Marxism. New Left Review 215, January 1996:5981.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., ed. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1987a. False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1987b. Plasticity into Power: Comparative-Historical Studies of the Institutional Conditions of Economic and Military Success. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. Science as a Vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Edited by Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Intepretive Sociology. Vol 1. Edited by Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus and translated by Fischoff, Ephraim et al. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whitete, Lucie E. 1990. Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G. Buffalo Law Review 38:158.Google Scholar