Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:32:49.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From a Symbolic Boom to a Marketing Bust: Genesis and Reconstruction of a Field of Legal and Political Expertise at the Crossroads of a Europe Opening to the Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Yves Dezalay
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The short history of environmental institutions and policies in Europe is marked by their radical reorientation. While environmental protection devices were initially conceived in the 1970s by using the classical model of the “watchdog state,” they underwent a shift during the 1990s: the ineffectiveness produced by bureaucratic constraints served as a pretext to hasten the disengagement of the state to the benefit of a regulation negotiated on the basis of financial incentives. The management of environmental issues now relies on the construction of an international market of sustainable development (or of a “rights to pollute” market, similar to that which has been established by the Kyoto protocol). The emergence and reconstruction of this field of expertise can be seen as a kind of microcosm of the perpetually unfinished Tower of Babel that is the European construction. One of the merits of this subject matter is to highlight the internal and external dynamics that have favored the success of a neoliberal counterattack.

Type
Symposium: Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , Winter 2007 , pp. 161 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, Pierre 1993. Esprits d'Etat: Genèse et structure du champ bureaucratique. Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 96–97:49–62.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002. Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées. Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 145:3–8.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin. 2005. La constitution européenne, Ordre politique, utopie juridique et guerre froide. Critique Internationale. January 2005:119–31.Google Scholar
Cohen-Tannugi, Laurent. 1989. La métamorphose de la démocratie. Paris: Odile Jacob. Google Scholar
De Jongh, Paul, and Captain, Sean. 1999. Our Common Journey: A Pioneering Approach to Cooperative Environmental Management. London: Zed Books. Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1992. Marchands de droit, La restructuration de l'ordre juridique international par les multinationales du droit. Paris: Fayard. Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 2002. From a “Golden Age” to an Uncertain Future: Lawyers and the Battles Around the German Environmental State. European Yearbook of Environmental Law 2.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 2004. Les courtiers de l'international, Héritiers cosmopolites, mercenaires de l'impérialisme et missionnaires de l'universel. Actes de la recherche en sciences socials 151–152:5–35.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2000. Henimod entreprenant milj⊘praksis: En præliminær analyse af dansk milj⊘ekspertise som socialt felt. Dansk Sociologi 1 (11):41–57.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2006. La construction européenne au carrefour du national et de l'international.” In Les formes de l'activité politique. Eléments d'analyse sociologique, XVIIIe–Xxe siècle, eds Cohen, Antonin, Lacroix, Bernard, and Riutort, Philippe. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars, Lawyers, Economists and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Dowie, Mark 1995. Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Elkington, John. 1991. A Year in the Greenhouse: An Environmental Diary. London: Victor Gollancz LTD. Google Scholar
Elkington, John. 1998. Cannibals With Forks, The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers. Google Scholar
Golub, Jonathan, ed. 1998. New Instruments for Environment Policy in the EU. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Robert. 1993. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement. Washington, DC: Island Press. Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert. 1984. “The Ideal and the Actual in the Law”: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910. In The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America, ed. Gawalt, Gerard W. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M., Keohane, Robert O., and Levy, Mark A., eds. 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Haigh, N. 1999. European Environmental Policy at 25: Retrospect and Prospect. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy 17.Google Scholar
Haigh, Nigel, and Lanigan, C. 1995. Impact of the European Union on UK Environmental Policy Making. In UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s, ed. Gray, Tim. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Helvarg, David. 1996. “The Big Green Spin Machine”: Corporations and Environmental PR. The Amicus Journal 18 (2):13–21.Google Scholar
Héritier, Adrienne, Knill, Christopher, and Mingers, Susan. 1996. Ringing the Changes in Europe: Regulatory Competition and Redefinition of the State. Britain, France, Germany. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Hulsberg, Werner. 1988. The German Greens: A Social and Political Profile. London: Verso. Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semisovereign State (Policy and Politics in Industrial States). Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre 1994. L'eco-pouvoir, environnements et politiques. Paris: La Découverte. Google Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre, and Bourhis, J. P. Le, 1997. L'environnement ou l'administration des possibles, La création des Directions Régionales de l'Environnement. Paris: l'Harmattan. Google Scholar
Liefferink, Duncan, and Skou Andersen, Mikael. 1998. Greening the E.U.: National Positions in the Run-up to the Amsterdam Treaty. Environmental Politics 7 (3):66–93.Google Scholar
Lowe, Philip, and Ward, Stephen, eds. 1998. British Environmental Policy and Europe. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Moore, Curtis, and Miller, Alan. 1994. Green Gold: Japan, Germany, the United States, and the Race for Environmental Technology. Boston: Beacon Press. Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 1991. British Politics and the Environment. London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 1995. The Global Environmental Movement. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
O'Riordan, Tim, and Voisey, Heather. 1997. Sustainable Development in Western Europe: Coming to Terms with Agenda 21. London: Frank Cass. Google Scholar
Pehle, Heinrich. 1997. Germany: Domestic Obstacles to an International Forerunner. In European Environment Policy: The Pioneers, ed. Andersen, Mikael Skou and Liefferink, Duncan. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckard. 1997. Flexible Instruments in German Environmental Law. In Economic Strength and Environmental Protection by Quick Permit Procedures: A Comparison of Germany and the United States of America, eds Martini, Claudia and Weingarten, Joe. Mainz: RIRP.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1995. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Rowell, Andrew. 1996. Green Backlash, Global Subversion of the Environment Movement. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart, eds. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Shaiko, Ronald G. 1999. Voices and Echoes for the Environment: Public Interest Representation in the 1990s and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm, and Wesseling, Rein. 1997. The Legal Community: Judges, Lawyers, Officials and Clerks in the Writing of Europe. European Law Journal 2:165–68.Google Scholar
Skou Andersen, Mikael. 1994. Governance by Green Taxes, Making Pollution Pay. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Skou Andersen, Mikael, and Liefferink, Duncan, eds. 1997. European Environment Policy: The Pioneers. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Bron Raymond. 1995. Ecological Resistance Movements: The Global Emergence of Radical and Popular Environmentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
Tellegen, E. 1981. The Environmental Movement in the Netherlands. In Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning 3, ed. O'Riordan, Timothy and Kerry Turner, R. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wapner, Paul. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State of New York University Press. Google Scholar
Weidner, H. 1995. 25 Years of Modern Environmental Policy in Germany, Treading a Well-Worn Path to the Top of the International Field. Working Paper FS II-95-30. Berlin: WZB. Google Scholar
Weidner, H., ed. 1997. Performance and Characteristics of German Environmental Policy, Working Paper FS II 97-301. Berlin: WZB. Google Scholar
Welford, Richard. 1997. Hijacking Environmentalism: Corporate Responses to Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan. Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1994. International Governance, Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar