Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:56:59.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engaging Hearts and Minds: How and Why Legal Organizations Use Public Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

David L. Trowbridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While scholars recognize that cause lawyers use public education as a reform tactic, they rarely place this tactic at the center of their analysis, leaving a gap in our understanding of how cause lawyers use extrajudicial tactics to navigate the limits of litigation. In this article, I examine the role of public education in the work of cause lawyers, through a study of lawyers from eight legal organizations representing the rights of LGBTQ people. Through interviews, archival work, and analysis of publications, I find that lawyers and organizations use education for four functions: (1) to prime a pathway to successful litigation; (2) to control for backlash; (3) to leverage pressure during litigation or policy negotiation; and (4) to generate community and public awareness. This article shows that public education is not simply an ancillary tool to these groups—it is vital to their missions and their everyday work.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , November 2019 , pp. 1196 - 1220
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The article has been substantially improved by feedback on numerous drafts from fantastic scholars and mentors Julie Novkov, Ellen Andersen, and Matthew Ingram. The author would also like to thank the journal’s anonymous reviewers for improving the clarity and quality of the article. This project was possible in part thanks to funding from the University at Albany Dissertation Research Award and the University at Albany Benevolent Association Grant. IRB No. 15X190‐02.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Jacqueline. “New Staff Members.” Lambda Update (Summer 1990). Periodical Collection, Newsletters, L Folder. GLBT Historical Society Archives and Museum.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. Out of the Closets & into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Arkles, Gabriel, Gehi, Pooja, and Redfield, Elana. “The Role of Lawyers in Trans Liberation: Building a Transformative Movement for Social Change.” Seattle Journal for Social Justice 8, no. 2 (2010): 579–641.Google Scholar
Aron, Nan. Liberty and Justice for All: Public Interest Law in the 1980’s and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ashar, Sameer. “Law Clinics and Collective Mobilization.” Clinical Law Review 14 (2008): 455.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A. Jr. “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation.” The Yale Law Journal 85, no. 4 (March 1, 1976): 470–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonauto, Mary, and Esseks, James. “Marriage Equality Advocacy from the Trenches.” Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 29, no. 1 (2015): 117.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. “Making Lemonade: Turning Adverse Decisions into Opportunities for Mobilization.” Amici, no. 13 (2005): 8–13.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. “Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity.” American Journal of Sociology 96, no. 5 (1991): 1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buseck, Gary. “Memo from Gary Buseck to Strategic Planning Committee in Re: Review of GLAD’s Education Work Since 1978” (1999). Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders Records (MS 1961), Box 29, Folder 1. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Leonore. “Getting Queer Priorities Straight: How Direct Legal Services Can Democratize Issue Prioritization in the LGBT Rights Movement.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law & Social Change 17, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 107–36.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Leonore. “The Next Phase: Positioning the Post-Obergefell LGBT Rights Movement to Bridge the Gap between Formal and Lived Equality.” Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties 13, no. 2 (2017).Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., and Eagly, Ingrid V.. “A Critical Reflection on Law and Organizing.” UCLA Law Review 48 (2001): 443–517.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., and NeJaime, Douglas. “Lawyering for Marriage Equality.” UCLA Law Review 57 (2010): 1235–1331.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Tarrow, Sidney. “Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena.” Law & Social Inquiry 39, no. 2 (Spring 2014): 449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellmann, Stephen. “Cause Lawyering in the Third World.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. Edited by Sarat, Austin and Stuart, A. Scheingold, 349–429. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Elsesser, Charles. “Community Lawyering – The Role of Lawyers in the Social Justice Movement.” Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 14 (Spring 2013): 375–404.Google Scholar
Fox, Jeremy C. “Patients, Advocates Hope to Ease a Visible Burden.” Boston Globe. March 24, 2014. https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2014/03/23/bill-would-provide-treatment-mandate-for-disfiguring-side-effect-hiv-medications/pYHxCwpc89BgKwDmqTZpAJ/story.html.Google Scholar
GLAD. “Statement of Purpose and Descriptions.” Gay and Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (1979). Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders Records (MS 1962), Box 5, Folder 5. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jennifer. “The Lawyer Is Not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change.” California Law Review 95, no. 5 (October 31, 2007): 2133–46.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, and Torres, Gerald. “Changing the Wind: Notes Toward a Demosprudence of Law and Social Movements.” Cornell Law Faculty Publications (June 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. Social Movements and the Legal System: Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press Inc, 1978.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F., Ginsberg, Betsy, and Snow, Arthur. “The Public Interest Law Industry.” In Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis. Edited by Weisbrod, Burton Allen, Handler, Joel F., and Komesar, Neil K., 42–79. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hildebran, Andrea. “Memo from Andrea Hildebran to Strategic Planning Community and Gary Buseck in Re: Summary of Public Education Department Functions” (August 12, 1999). Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders Records (MS 1961), Box 29, Folder 1. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer. “Conducting Intensive Interviews and Elite Interviews.” Workshop on Interdisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research [Internet] (2009). https://scholar.harvard.edu/jlhochschild/publications/conducting-intensive-interviews-and-elite-interviews.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law and Society 43, no. 1 (2009): 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael. From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael. “How Brown Changed Race Relations: The Backlash Thesis.” The Journal of American History 81, no. 1 (June 1994): 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreis, Anthony Michael. “Stages of Constitutional Grief: Democratic Constitutionalism and the Marriage Revolution.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 4 (January 1, 2018): 877–988.Google Scholar
Lambda Legal. “2013 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax (Form 990).” U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, October 31, 2014. https://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/anf_fy2014_990_2.pdf.Google Scholar
Lambda Legal. “2015 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax (Form 990).” U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, October 31, 2016. https://www.lambdalegal.org/sites/default/files/990.pdf.Google Scholar
Lambda Legal. “A Description of the Organization and Its Work | Lambda Legal.” Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., 1990 1989. Newsletter Box. LGBT Community Center National History Archive, New York City.Google Scholar
Lambda Legal. “HIV Is Not a Crime II- National Training Academy.” Lambda Legal (2017). https://www.lambdalegal.org/events/160517_educ-hiv-is-not-a-crime-ii.Google Scholar
Lambda Legal. “Impact Magazine Fall 2008.” Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. (Fall 2008). http://www.lambdalegal.org/publications/impact_2008_fall.Google Scholar
Leachman, Gwendolyn. “From Protest to Perry: How Litigation Shaped the LGBT Movement’s Agenda.” UC Davis Law Review 47 (2014): 1667–1751.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. “The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics.” Harvard Law Review 120 (February 1, 2007): 937–88.Google Scholar
Lopez, Gerald P. Rebellious Lawyering: One Chicano’s Vision of Progressive Law Practice. 1 st edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Maher, Pat. “Memo from Pat Maher to Lambda Board, Re: Public Education Program,” 1983. Richard Burns Papers, Box 5. LGBT Community Center National History Archive.Google Scholar
Malici, Akan, and Smith, Elizabeth S.. Political Science Research in Practice . New York; London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. “Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment.” Law & Social Inquiry 28, no. 3 (2003): 659–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. “Social Movement Strategies and the Participatory Potential of Litigation.” In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Edited by Sarat, Austin and Stuart, A. Scheingold, 164–81. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. “When the First Quail Calls: Multiple Consciousness as Jurisprudential Method.” Women’s Rights Law Reporter 11, no. 1 (1989): 7.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. 1st edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. “Social Movements and the Mobilization of Law.” In Social Movements and American Political Institutions. Edited by Costain, Anne and McFarland, Andrew, 201–15. People, Passions, and Power. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael, and Silverstein, Helena. “Rethinking Law’s ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. Edited by Sarat, Austin and Stuart, A. Scheingold, 261–92. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Meili, Stephen. “Consumer Cause Lawyers in the United States: Lawyers for the Movement or a Movement unto Themselves?” In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Edited by Sarat, Austin and Stuart, A. Scheingold, 120–44. Stanford Law Books, 2006.Google Scholar
NCLR. “2013 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax (Form 990).” U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, June 2, 2014. http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/943/086/2013-943086885-0a76272f-9.pdf.Google Scholar
NCLR Staff. “Lesbians of Color Project Gets Off the Ground.” National Center for Lesbian Rights Newsletter (Fall/Winter 1990). NAT-NGLTF Box. LGBT Community Center Archive, New York City, NY.Google Scholar
NCLR Staff. “Overview of Public Education Program,” March 26, 1996. Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders Records (MS 1961), Box 29, Folder 1. Manuscripts and Archives, Yale University Library.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth, and Albiston, Catherine. “The Organization of Public Interest Practice: 1975–2004.” North Carolina Law Review 84, no. 5 (2005): 1591–621.Google Scholar
Powers, Ed. “Legal Battle for Rights Demands New Strategy.” Bay Area Reporter (June 25, 1987). Donna Hitchens Papers, Carton 1. GLBT Historical Society Archives and Museum.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. “Public Interest Law: The Movement at Midlife.” Stanford Law Review 60, no. 6 (April 1, 2008): 2027–84.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. “Courting Disaster: Looking for Change in All the Wrong Places.” Drake Law Review 54 (2005): 795–829.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. “The Struggle to Politicize Legal Practice: A Case Study of the Left-Activist Lawyering in Seattle.” In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. Edited by Sarat, Austin and Stuart, A. Scheingold, 118–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A., and Sarat, Austin. Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. 1 st edition. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics, 2004.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, and Walker, Jack L Jr. “The Litigation Strategies of Interest Groups.” In Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Edited by Walker, Jack L Jr., 157–84. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61, no. 2 (2008): 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Helena. Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N.. “Why Do Interest Groups Engage the Judiciary? Policy Wishes and Structural Needs*.” Social Science Quarterly 87, no. 3 (September 1, 2006): 558–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill, and Waltenburg, Eric N. Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Revised, Expanded edition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2015.Google Scholar
Sylvia Rivera Law Project. “Trainings and Speaking Engagements” (2017). https://srlp.org/trainings/.Google Scholar
Tansey, Oisín. “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40, no. 4 (2007): 765–72.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Tauber, Steven C. Navigating the Jungle: Law, Politics, and the Animal Advocacy Movement. 1 st edition. New York: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, Urvashi. Virtual Equality: The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation. New York: Anchor Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. Political Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar