Creating the Reasonable Child: Risk, Responsibility, and the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine

Evelyn Atkinson

doi:10.1111/lsi.12304

Creating the Reasonable Child: Risk, Responsibility, and the Attractive Nuisance Doctrine

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018

Evelyn Atkinson

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

In common law, trespassers could not sue for injuries. In the early 1870s, however, courts exempted child trespassers injured by industrial machinery from this rule. The development of the hotly contested “attractive nuisance” doctrine illustrates turn-of-the-twentieth-century debates about how to allocate the risk of injury from industrial accidents, which linked responsibility to the capacity to understand danger and to exert self-control. Although at first courts in attractive nuisance cases perceived children as innocent, irrational “butterflies,” they gradually reconceived child plaintiffs to be rational, risk-bearing individuals, a change reflected and accelerated by the Safety First campaign launched by railroad corporations. This reframing of children's ability to bear risk created the standard of the “reasonable child,” which transferred responsibility for industrial accidents to children themselves. Although by the 1930s the attractive nuisance doctrine had been widely accepted, in practice the “reasonable child” standard posed a difficult hurdle for child plaintiffs to overcome.

Type: Articles
Information: Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 1122 - 1154

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12304 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, Mark. 1992. Safety First Comes to the Railroads, 1910–1939. Railway & Locomotive Historical Society 166:6–33.Google Scholar

Aldrich, Mark. 1997. Safety First: Technology, Labor, and Business in the Building of American Work Safety, 1870–1939. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, Mark. 2006. Death Rode the Rails: American Railroad Accidents and Safety, 1828–1965. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Alphonso, Gwendoline. 2014. Of Families or Individuals? Southern Child Workers and the Progressive Crusade for Child Labor Regulation, 1899–1920. In Children and Youth During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, ed. Marten, James, 59–80. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

American Law Institute (ALI). 1934. Artificial Conditions Highly Dangerous to Trespassing Children. In Restatement of Torts (First). St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute.Google Scholar

American Law Institute (ALI) 1965 (updated 2016). Artificial Conditions Highly Dangerous to Trespassing Children. Restatement of Torts (Second). St. Paul, MN: American Law Institute.Google Scholar

American Railway Safety Association. 1913. Railway World 57:825–26.Google Scholar

Atkinson, Evelyn. 2013. Out of the Household: Master‐Servant Relations and Employer Liability Law. Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 25:205–70.Google Scholar

Bailey, Roy Rutherford. 1917. Sure Pop and the Safety Scouts. New York: World Book Co.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, Jim. 2014. The Coal Famine of 1903. http://www.connectingthewindycity.com/2014/01/the-coal-famine-of-1903.html (accessed April 24, 2017).Google Scholar

Batson, R. Neal. 1967. Trespassing Children: A Study in Expanding Liability. Vanderbilt Law Review 20:139–69.Google Scholar

Belnap, H. W. 1918. The Importance of Organized Safety Work. Railroad Trainman 35:483–87.Google Scholar

Brewer, Holly. 2005. By Birth or Consent: Children, Law & the Anglo‐American Revolution in Authority. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Browne, Irving. 1897. The Allurement of Infants. American Law Review 31:891–904.Google Scholar

Brownell, H. L. 1913. Education in Public Safety. In Second Safety Congress of the National Council for Industrial Safety, 25–27. Chicago: National Council for Industrial Safety.Google Scholar

Buckner, D. E. 1967. Comment Note—Age and Mentality of Child as Affecting Application of Attractive Nuisance Doctrine. American Law Reports 3d16:25.Google Scholar

Carson, George C. 1914. Report of Committee on Safety. Electric Railway Journal 44:165–66.Google Scholar

Children's Calendar Teaches Danger of Trespassing. 1916. Railway Review 59:799.Google Scholar

Chudacoff, Howard. 2007. Children at Play: An American History. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Clement, Priscilla Ferguson. 1997. Growing Pains: Children in the Industrial Age, 1850–1890. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar

Cobbey, J. E. 1907. Cobbey's Annotated Statutes of Nebraska, Vol. 2. Beatrice, NE: J. E. Cobbey.Google Scholar

Compilation of the Laws of the State of North Dakota. 1915. Bismark, ND: Board of Railroad Commissioners.Google Scholar

Cooley, Thomas M. 1868. A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the States of the American Union. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar

Coon, J. W. 1913. Not a Passenger Killed in Five Years. Official Proceedings of the New York Railroad Club 23:3050–82.Google Scholar

Corporation Laws of the State of Missouri, The. 1900. Jefferson City, MO: Tribune.Google Scholar

Deadly Toll of Trespass on Railways, The. 1915. Railway Business Association Bulletin 16:3–11.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1899. The School and Society: Being Three Lectures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fourth Annual Report of the Railroad Commission of Indiana 1909. 1910. Indianapolis: Wm. B. Burford.Google Scholar

Garland, David S., and McGehee, Lucius P. 1898. The American and English Encyclopedia of Law, Vol. 7, 2d ed. New York: Edward Thompson.Google Scholar

General Laws of Massachusetts Relating to Railroad Corporations. 1897. Boston: Wright & Potter.Google Scholar

Grade Crossings, The. 1915. Washington Times, November 22, 6.Google Scholar

Grant, H. Roger. 1997. Railroads in the Heartland: Steam and Traction in the Golden Age of Postcards. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar

Grossberg, Michael. 2003. “A Protected Childhood”: The Emergence of Child Protection in America. In American Public Life and the Historical Imagination, ed. Gamber, Wendy, Grossberg, Michael, and Hartog, Hendrik, 213–39. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Hearings Before the Subcommittee of the Committee on Interstate Commerce, U.S. Senate, 64th Congress, Second Session. 1917. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr. 1881. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar

How Safety Was Sold to Seventeen Hundred Picked School Boys at Milwaukee. 1920. National Safety News 2:14.Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley. 1923. The Turntable Cases in the Federal Courts. Harvard Law Review 36:826–54.Google Scholar

Karsten, Peter. 1997. Heart Versus Head: Judge‐Made Law in Nineteenth‐Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Karsten, Peter. 1998. Enabling the Poor to Have Their Day in Court: The Sanctioning of Contingency Fee Contracts, A History to 1940. DePaul Law Review 47:231–60.Google Scholar

Lane, Joseph H. 1915. America's Negligence—Railway Trespass. Worcester Magazine 18:131–35.Google Scholar

Leigh, Edmund. 1916. New Ideals in Police Administration: Educating Our Friends, the Public, to Keep Off Our Property. Baltimore and Ohio Employes Magazine 3:25–29.Google Scholar

Levy, Jonathan. 2012. Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Metcalfe, F. M. 1920. Activity of the Railway Accident Prevention Movement. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Convention of the Association of Governmental Labor Officials of the United States and Canada, 124–29. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Mintz, Steven. 2004. Huck's Raft: A History of American Childhood. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mohun, Arwen. 2013. Risk: Negotiating Safety in American Society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Nasaw, David. 1985. Children of the City: At Work and at Play. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Negligent Use of One's Property—Injuries to Children by Unguarded and Unfastened Turntable. 1875. Central Law Journal 2:170–76.Google Scholar

Odem, Mary E. 1995. Delinquent Daughters: Protecting and Policing Adolescent Female Sexuality in the United States, 1885–1920. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Payne, E. George. 1919. Education in Accident Prevention. Chicago: Lyons and Carnahan.Google Scholar

Pearson, Susan J. 2015. “Age Ought to Be a Fact”: The Campaign Against Child Labor and the Rise of the Birth Certificate. Journal of American History 10:1144–65.Google Scholar

Prosser, William L. 1955. Handbook of the Law of Torts, 2d ed. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar

Prosser, William L. 1959. Trespassing Children. California Law Review 47:427–69.Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe. 1907. The Need of a Sociological Jurisprudence. Green Bag 19:607–15.Google Scholar

Proceedings of the First Cooperative Safety Congress. 1912. Milwaukee, WI: Association of Iron and Steel Electrical Engineers.Google Scholar

Purcell, Edward. 1992. Litigation and Inequality: Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Industrial America, 1870–1958. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, R. C. 1915. Railways Accidents and “Safety First.” Journal of Political Economy 23:49–60.Google Scholar

Richards, R. C. 1917. The Safety‐First Movement on American Railways. In Proceedings of the Second Pan American Scientific Congress, Section IX, 326–50. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Riney‐Kehrberg, Pamela. 2000. Helping Ma and Helping Pa: Iowa's Turn‐of‐the‐Century Farm Children. Annals of Iowa 59:115–40.Google Scholar

Riney‐Kehrberg, Pamela. 2001. “But What Kind of Work Do the Rest of You Do?” Child Labor on Nebraska Farms, 1870–1920. Nebraska History 82:2–10 Google Scholar

Rockwell, John S. 1916. Highway Crossing Accidents—Their Cause, and How They Can Be Reduced. Railway Review 59:558–59.Google Scholar

Rothman, David. 1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.Google Scholar

Safety Rhymes for Children. 1913. Federal Trade Reporter 2:514.Google Scholar

Safety Work on Union Pacific. 1913. Public Service Regulations 2:345–47.Google Scholar

Schmidt, James D. 2010. Industrial Violence and the Legal Origins of Child Labor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shearman, Thomas Gaskell. 1888. A Treatise on the Law of Negligence, Vol. 1, 4th ed. New York: Baker, Voorhis.Google Scholar

Shulman, Harry. 1927. Standard of Care Required of Children. Yale Law Journal 37:618–25.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremiah. 1898. Liability of Landowners to Children Entering Without Permission, I. Harvard Law Review 11:349–73.Google Scholar

Steffes, Tracy. 2011. School, Society, and State: A New Education to Govern Modern America, 1890–1940. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, William. 1999. Lawyering for the Railroad: Business, Law, and Power in the New South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar

Trespasser Evil, The. 1915. Railway and Industrial Section of the Commercial and Financial Review 100, February 27, 3–4.Google Scholar

Trespassing Accidents. 1909. North Platte Semi‐Weekly Tribune (North Platte, NE), October 12.Google Scholar

Twain, Mark. [1884] 1892. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. New York: C. L. Webster.Google Scholar

Van Sant, R. M. 1915. Letters to the Editor. Railway Age Gazette 58:122.Google Scholar

Welke, Barbara Young. 1994. Unreasonable Women: Gender and the Law of Accidental Injury, 1870–1920. Law & Social Inquiry 19:369–403.Google Scholar

Welke, Barbara Young. 2001. Recasting American Liberty: Gender, Race, Law, and the Railroad Revolution, 1865–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Welke, Barbara Young. 2014. The Cowboy Suit Tragedy: Spreading Risk, Owning Hazard in the Modern American Consumer Economy. Journal of American History. 101:97–121.Google Scholar

West, Elliot. 1989. Growing Up with the Country: Childhood on the Far Western Frontier. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

White, G. Edward. 2003. Tort Law in America: An Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

White, Richard. 2011. Railroaded. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Wiecek, William. 1998. The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought: Law and Ideology in America, 1886–1937. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wiggin, Kate Douglas. 1903. Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Willrich, Michael. 2004. City of Courts: Socializing Justice in Progressive Era Chicago. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Witt, John Fabian. 2009. The Accidental Republic: Crippled Workingmen, Destitute Widows, and the Remaking of American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Zelizer, Viviana. 1985. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Atchison, T. & S.F.R. Co. v. Shaft (1885), 33 Kan. 521 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Atchison, T. & S.F.R. Co. v. Todd (1895), 54 Kan. 551, 38 P. 804 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Barrett v. Southern Pac. Co. (1891), 91 Cal. 296, 25 Am. St. Rep. 186 (Cal.).Google Scholar

Bennett v. Wabash, St. L. & P.R. Co. (1883), 61 Iowa 355 (Iowa).Google Scholar

Bielenberg v. Montana Union Ry. Co. (1889), 8 Mont. 271 (Mont.).Google Scholar

Biggs v. Consolidated Barb‐Wire Co. (1899), 60 Kan. 217, 56 P. 4 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Clark's Adm'x v. Hannibal & St. J.R. Co. (1865), 36 Mo. 202 (Mo.).Google Scholar

City of Shawnee v. Cheek (1913), 41 Okla. 227, 137 P. 724 (Okla.).Google Scholar

Conrad v. Baltimore & O.R. Co. (1908), 64 W.Va. 176, 61 S.E. 44 (W.Va.).Google Scholar

Consolidated City & C.P. Ry. Co. v. Carlson (1897), 58 Kan. 62, 48 P. 635 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Dublin Cotton Oil Co. v. Jarrard (1897), 40 S.W. 531, 534‐35 (Tex. Civ. App.).Google Scholar

Duron v. Beaumont Iron Works (1928), 9 S.W.2d 1104 (Tex. Comm. App.).Google Scholar

Ecliff v. Wabash, St. L. & P.R. Co. (1887), 31 N.W. 180, 64 Mich. 196 (Mich.).Google Scholar

Edgington v. Burlington, C.R. & N.R. Co. (1902), 116 Iowa 410, 90 N.W. 95 (Iowa).Google Scholar

Emond v. Kimberly‐Clark Co. (1914), 159 Wis. 83, 149 N.W. 760 (Wisc.).Google Scholar

Faylor v. Great Eastern Quicksilver Mining Co. (1919), 45 Cal. App. 194, 187 P. 101 (Cal.).Google Scholar

Frost v. Eastern R. R. (1887), 64 N.H. 220, 9 A. 790, 791 (N.H.).Google Scholar

Garcia v. Soogian (1959), 338 P.2d 433, 52 Cal.2d 107 (Cal.).Google Scholar

George v. Los Angeles Ry. Co. (1899), 126 Cal. 357, 58 P. 819 (Cal.).Google Scholar

Gillam v. Sioux City & St. P.R. Co. (1897), 26 Minn. 268 (Minn.).Google Scholar

Gillespie v. McGowan (1882), 100 Pa. 144, 45 Am. Rep. 365 (Pa.).Google Scholar

Graham v. Sandhill Power Co. (1925), 189 N.C. 381, 127 S.E. 429 (N.C.).Google Scholar

Guilfoyle By and Through Wild v. Missouri, Kansas, and Texas R. Co. (1987), 812 F.2d 1290 (10th Cir.).Google Scholar

Hashtani v. Duke Power Co. (1978), 578 F.2d 542 (4th Cir.).Google Scholar

Heimann v. Kinnare (1901), 190 Ill. 156, 60 N.E. 215 (Neb.).Google Scholar

Herrera v. Southern Pac. Ry. Co. (1961), 188 Cal.App.2d 441, 10 Cal. Rptr. 575 (Cal. App.).Google Scholar

Holland v. Baltimore & O. R. Co. (1981), 431 A.2d 597 (D.C.).Google Scholar

Johns v. Fort Worth Power & Light Co. (1930), 30 S.W.2d 549 (Tex. Civ. App.).Google Scholar

Kansas Cent. Ry. Co. v. Fitzsimmons (1879), 22 Kan. 686, 31 Am. Rep. 203 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Kay v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (1870), 65 Pa. 269, 277 3 Am. Rep. 628 (Pa.).Google Scholar

Keffe v. Milwaukee & St. P. Ry. Co. (1875), 21 Minn. 207, 18 Am. Rep. 393 (Minn.).Google Scholar

Krummack v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. (1915), 98 Neb. 773, 154 N.W. 541 (Neb).Google Scholar

Lynchburg Telephone Co. v. Bokker (1905), 103 Va. 594, 50 S.E. 148 (Va.).Google Scholar

Mangold v. St. Louis, M. & S.E. Ry. (1906), 116 Mo. App. 606 (Mo.).Google Scholar

Masser v. Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co. (1886), 68 Iowa 602, 27 N.W. 776 (Iowa).Google Scholar

McKiddy v. Des Moines Elec. Co. (1926), 202 Iowa 225, 206 N.W. 815 (Iowa).Google Scholar

McLendon v. Hampton Cotton Mills Co. (1917), 109 S.C. 238, 95 S.E. 781 (S.C.).Google Scholar

Merryman v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. (1892), 85 Iowa 634, 52 N.W. 545 (Iowa).Google Scholar

Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Beckwith (1889), 129 U.S. 26, 9 S. Ct. 207 (Sup. Ct.).Google Scholar

Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Humes (1885), 115 U.S. 512, 6 S. Ct. 110 (Sup. Ct.).Google Scholar

Munn v. People of State of Illinois (1876), 94 U.S. 113 (Sup. Ct.).Google Scholar

Nashville Lumber Co. v. Busbee (1911), 100 Ark. 76,139 S.W. 301 (Ark.).Google Scholar

Nelson v. Burnham & Morrill Co. (1915), 114 Me. 213, 95 A. 1029 (Maine).Google Scholar

Nolley v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. (1950), 183 F.2d 566 (8th Cir.).Google Scholar

Peoria, D. & E. Ry. Co. v. Schiller (1883), 12 Ill. App. 443 (Ill. App.).Google Scholar

Perkins v. Eastern R. Co. (1849), 29 Me. 307 (Me.).Google Scholar

Pratt Coal & Iron Co. v. Brawley (1888), 83 Ala. 371, 3 So. 555 (Ala.).Google Scholar

Riggle v. Lens (1914), 71 Or. 125, 142 P. 346 (Or.).Google Scholar

Ryan v. Towar (1901), 128 Mich. 463, 87 N.W. 644 (Mich.).Google Scholar

Schmitz v. St. Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. Co. (1893), 119 Mo. 256, 24 S.W. 472 (Mo.).Google Scholar

Sioux City & P. R. Co. v. Stout (1873), 84 U.S. 657 (Sup. Ct.).Google Scholar

Sioux City & P. R. Co. v. Stout (1873), 84 U.S. 657 (Sup. Ct.) (U.S. Supreme Court Records, Plaintiff's Brief).Google Scholar

State ex rel. Kansas City Light & Power Co. v. Trimble (1926), 315 Mo. 32, 285 S.W. 455 (Mo.).Google Scholar

Stiele ex rel. Gladieux v. City of Crystal (2002), 646 N.W.2d 251 (Minn. Ct. App.).Google Scholar

Stout v. Sioux City & P.R. Co. (1872), 23 F. Cas. 180 (D. Neb.).Google Scholar

Studer v. Southern Pac. Co. (1898), 121 Cal. 400, 53 P. 942 (Cal.).Google Scholar

Twist v. Winona & St. P. R. Co. (1888), 39 N.W. 402, 39 Minn. 164 (Minn.).Google Scholar

United Zinc & Chem. Co. v. Britt (1922), 258 U.S. 268, 42 S. Ct. 299 (Sup. Ct.).Google Scholar

Weik v. Southern Pac. Co. (1913), 132 P. 775, 21 Cal. App. 711 (Cal.).Google Scholar

Western & A.R. Co. v. Young (1888), 7 S.E. 912, 81 Ga. 397 (Ga.).Google Scholar

Wilmes v. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. (1916), 175 Iowa 101, 156 N.W. 877 (Iowa).Google Scholar

Wilson v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry. Co. (1903), 71 P. 282, 66 Kan. 183 (Kan.).Google Scholar

Woolson v. Northern R. R. (1848), 19 N.H. 267 (N.H.).Google Scholar