Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:46:55.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity in the Face of Penal Innovation: Revisiting the History of American Solitary Confinement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Ashley T. Rubin  and
Keramet Reiter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solitary confinement has been a perennial tool of control in US prisons, despite its status as a repeatedly delegitimized practice. Although there have been significant changes in punishment over time, solitary confinement has remained, mostly at the margins and always as a response to past failures, part of an unending search for greater control over prisoners. This history raises the question of how a discredited penal technology can nevertheless persist. We locate the source of this persistence in prison administrators' unflagging belief in solitary confinement as a last-resort tool of control. To maintain this highly criticized practice, prison administrators strategically revise, but never abandon, discredited practices in response to antecedent legitimacy struggles. Using solitary confinement as a case study, we demonstrate how penal technologies that violate current sensibilities can survive, despite changing macro-level social factors that otherwise explain penal change and practice, provided those technologies serve prison officials' internal goals.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Fall 2018 , pp. 1604 - 1632
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

51st Annual Report of the Inspectors of the State Penitentiary for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 1881. Philadelphia, PA: McLaughlin Brothers.Google Scholar
Association of State Correctional Administrators (ASCA) and the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program at Yale Law School. 2016. Aiming to Reduce Time in Cell: Reports from Correctional Systems on the Numbers of Prisoners in Restricted Housing and on the Potential of Policy Changes to Bring About Reforms. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/area/center/liman/document/aimingtoreducetic.pdf (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Barker, V. 2009. The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way American Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. E. 1921. “The Historical Origin of the Prison System in America.” Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology 12 (1): 35–60.Google Scholar
Beck, A. J. 2015. Special Report: Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011–12. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/urhuspj1112.pdf (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Beckett, K. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bissonnette, J., with Hamm, R., Dellelo, R., and Rodman, E. 2008. When the Prisoners Ran Walpole: A True Story in the Movement for Prison Abolition. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
BPDS. [1826] 1827. First Annual Report of the Board of Managers of the Boston Prison Discipline Society. Boston: T. R. Marvin.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. C. 2011. “Politics, Prisons, and Law Enforcement: An Examination of the Emergence of ‘Law and Order’ Politics in Texas.” Law & Society Review 45 (3): 631–65.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. C. 2014. “The Emergence of Penal Extremism in California: A Dynamic View of Institutional Structures and Political Processes.” Law & Society Review 48 (2): 377–409.Google Scholar
Crewe, B. 2011. “Soft Power in Prison: Implications for Staff-Prisoner Relationships, Liberty and Legitimacy.” European Journal of Criminology 8 (6): 455–68.Google Scholar
Cummins, E. 1994. The Rise and Fall of California's Radical Prison Movement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
DeAvila, J. 2017. “Prisons Balk at Curbing Isolation.” US News, April 30, A-3.Google Scholar
DeBeaumont, G., and deTocqueville, A. 1833. On the Penitentiary System in the United States and its Application in France. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard.Google Scholar
Dickens, C. [1842] 2000. American Notes. Ed. Ingham, Patricia. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Dolan, J. 2011. “Indefinite Solitary Confinement Persists in California Prisons.” Los Angeles Times, September 5.Google Scholar
Doll, E. E. 1957. “Trial and Error at Allegheny: The Western State Penitentiary, 1818–1838.” Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 81 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eason, J. M. 2017. Big House on the Prairie: Rise of the Rural Ghetto and Prison Proliferation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M., and Rubin, E. 2000. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M., and Simon, J. 1992. “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications.” Criminology 30 (4): 449–74.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1985. Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 2012. Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, P. 2008. “‘It's Just Black, White, or Hispanic’: An Observational Study of Racializing Moves in California's Segregated Prison Reception Centers.” Law & Society Review 42 (4): 735–70.Google Scholar
Goodman, P., Page, J., and Phelps, M. 2015. “The Long Struggle: An Agonistic Perspective on Penal Development.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (3): 315–35.Google Scholar
Goodman, P., Page, J., and Phelps, M. 2017. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grassian, S. 2006. “Psychiatric Effects of Solitary Confinement.” Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 22:325–83.Google Scholar
Haney, C. 2017. “‘Madness’ and Penal Confinement: Some Observations on Mental Illness and Prison Pain.” Punishment & Society, online first. doi:10.1177/1462474517705389.Google Scholar
Haney, C., and Lynch, M. 1997. “Regulating Prisons of the Future: A Psychological Analysis of Supermax and Solitary Confinement.” NYU Review of Law & Social Change 23:477–570.Google Scholar
Hepburn, J. 1985. “The Exercise of Power in Coercive Organizations: A Study of Prison Guards.” Criminology 23 (1): 145–64.Google Scholar
Ibsen, A. Z. 2013. “Ruling by Favors: Prison Guards' Informal Exercise of Institutional Control.” Law & Social Inquiry 38 (2): 342–63.Google Scholar
Illinois Department of Corrections. 2012. “Tamms Correctional Center Closing: Fact Sheet.” http://cgfa.ilga.gov/upload/TammsMeetingTestimonyDocuments.pdf (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Irwin, J. 2005. The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. E. 2000. “Monstrous Offenders and the Search for Solidarity Through Modern Punishment.” Hastings Law Journal 51:829–908.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. 2012. “Virginia Plans Changes in Prisoner Isolation Process.” Washington Post, March 30.Google Scholar
LaChance, D. 2016. Executing Freedom: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. F. 1922. The Development of American Prisons and Prison Customs, 1776–1845: With Special Reference to Early Institutions in the State of New York. Albany, NY: Prison Association of New York.Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, A. 1996. Twice the Work of Free Labor: The Political Economy of Convict Labor in the New South. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Liebling, A. 2000. “Prison Officers, Policing and the Use of Discretion.” Theoretical Criminology 4 (3): 333–57.Google Scholar
Liu, S. 2015. “Law's Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Lownes, C. [1793] 1799. An Account of the Alteration and Present State of the Penal Laws of Pennsylvania, Containing Also, an Account of the Gaol and Penitentiary House of Philadelphia—and the Interior Management Thereof. Boston: Young & Minns.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. 2010. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
“Mandela Rules” (UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners). 2015. UN Economic and Social Council, Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, 24th Session, Vienna, May 18–24, E/CN.15/2015/L.6/Rev.1. http://solitaryconfinement.org/uploads/MandelaRules2015UNdocRev.1.pdf (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Martin, J. 2013. “State Prisons Rethink Solitary Confinement.” Seattle Times, January 7. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/state-prisons-rethink-solitary-confinement/ (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
McLennan, R. M. 2008. The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mears, D. P., and Bales, W. D. 2009. “Supermax Incarceration and Recidivism.” Criminology 47 (4): 1131–66.Google Scholar
Mears, D. P., and Bales, W. D. 2010. “Supermax Housing: Placement, Duration, and Time to Reentry.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38 (4): 545–54.Google Scholar
Mears, D. P., and Reisig, M. D. 2006. “The Theory and Practice of Supermax Prisons.” Punishment & Society 8 (1): 33–57.Google Scholar
Melossi, D., and Pavarini, M. 1981. The Prison and the Factory: Origins of the Penitentiary System. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar
Meranze, M. 1996. Laboratories of Virtue: Punishment, Revolution, and Authority in Philadelphia, 1760–1835. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mitford, J. 1974. Kind and Usual Punishment: The Prison Business. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
National Prison Association. 1890. Proceedings of the Annual Congress of the National Prison Association of the United States, held at Cincinnati, September 25–30, 1890. Pittsburgh: Shaw Brothers.Google Scholar
Odier, P. 1982. The Rock: A History of the Fort/the Prison. Eagle Rock, CA: L'Image Odier.Google Scholar
O'Hearn, D. 2013. “Diaspora of Practice: Northern Irish Imprisonment and the Transnational Rise of Cellular Isolation.” Breac: A Digital Journal of Irish Studies, April 12. https://breac.nd.edu/articles/diaspora-of-practice-northern-irish-imprisonment-and-the-transnational-rise-of-cellular-isolation/ (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
O'Keefe, M. 2017. “Reflections on Colorado's Administrative Segregation Study.” National Institute of Justice Journal, 278: NCJ 250346.Google Scholar
Page, J. 2011. The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers' Union in California. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, G. 1826. A Brief Account of the Constitution, Management, & Discipline &c. &c. of the New-York State Prison at Auburn. Auburn, NY: U. F. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Pratt, J. 2008. “Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess: Part I: The Nature and Roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism.” British Journal of Criminology 48:119–37.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. 2012. “The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960–2006.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 57:71–124.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. 2014a. “The Pelican Bay Hunger Strike: Resistance Within the Structural Constraints of a U.S. Supermax Prison.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (3): 579–611.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. 2014b. “Punitive Contrasts: United States vs. Denmark—A Socio-Legal Comparison of Two Prison Systems.” In The Criminal Justice and Law Enforcement Annual: Global Perspectives, ed. Sullivan, Larry, Vol. 6.1, 139–76. New York: AMS Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. Forthcoming. “The International Persistence & Resilience of Solitary Confinement.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series. Google Scholar
Reiter, K., and Blair, T. 2015. “Punishing Mental Illness: Trans-Institutionalization and Solitary Confinement in the United States.” In Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement, ed. Reiter, K. and Koenig, A., 177–96. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Reiter, K., and Coutin, S. 2017. “Crossing Borders and Criminalizing Identity: The Disintegrated Subjects of Administrative Sanctions.” Law & Society Review 51 (3): 567–601.Google Scholar
Reiter, K., and Koenig, A. 2015. Extreme Punishment: Comparative Studies in Detention, Incarceration and Solitary Confinement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rhodes, L. 2004. Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Riveland, C. 1999. Supermax Prisons: Overview and General Considerations. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections, Government Printing Office. http://static.nicic.gov/Library/014937.pdf (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Ross, J. I. 2013. The Globalization of Supermax Prisons. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, D. J. 1980. Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2013. Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875. PhD diss., U.C. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2015a. “A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion.” Law & Society Review 49 (2): 365–99.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2015b. “Resistance or Friction: Understanding the Significance of Secondary Adjustments.” Theoretical Criminology 19 (1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2016. “Penal Change as Penal Layering: A Case Study of Proto-Prison Adoption and Capital Punishment Reduction, 1785–1822.” Punishment & Society 18 (4): 420–41.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2017a. “The Consequences of Prisoners' Micro-Resistance.” Law & Social Inquiry 42 (1): 138–62.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2017b. “Resistance as Agency? Incorporating the Structural Determinants of Prisoner Behaviour.” British Journal of Criminology 57 (3): 644–63Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. Forthcoming a. “The Birth of the Penal Organization: Why Prisons Were Born to Fail.” In The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice, ed. Aviram, H., Greenspan, R., and Simon, J. Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. Forthcoming b. “The Prehistory of Innovation: A Longer View of Penal Change.” Punishment & Society. Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. In prep. The Deviant Prison: Eastern State Penitentiary and the Advantage of Difference, 1829–1913. Book manuscript.Google Scholar
Rusche, G., and Kirchheimer, O. 1939. Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sapien, J. 2017. “On Rikers Island, a Move Toward Reform Causes Trouble.” ProPublica, July 26. https://www.propublica.org/article/on-rikers-island-a-move-toward-reform-causes-trouble (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, H. 2010. “Mass Incarceration and the Paradox of Prison Conditions Litigation.” Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 731–68.Google Scholar
Scott, M. B., and Lyman, S. M. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62.Google Scholar
Shalev, S. 2009. Supermax: Controlling Risk Through Solitary Confinement. London: Willan.Google Scholar
Shane, S. 2011. “Accused Soldier in Brig as Wikileaks Link Is Sought.” New York Times, January 13.Google Scholar
Sellin, T. 1953. “Philadelphia Prisons of the Eighteenth Century.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43:326–31.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 1993. Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Urban Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 2007. Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. S. 2006. “The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History and Review of the Literature.” Crime and Justice 34:441–528.Google Scholar
Smith, P. S. 2009. “Solitary Confinement: History, Practice, and Human Rights Standards.” Prison Service Journal 181:3–11.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Bottoms, A., and Hay, W. 1996. Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stromberg, J. 2014. “The Science of Solitary Confinement.” Smithsonian.com, February 19. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/science-solitary-confinement-180949793/ (accessed October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Teeters, N. K. 1955. The Cradle of the Penitentiary: The Walnut Street Jail at Philadelphia, 1773–1835. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. A. 2016. Blood in the Water: The Attica Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Turnbull, R. J. 1797. A Visit to the Philadelphia Prison. Philadelphia: London; reprinted by James Phillips & Sons.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. 2002. “The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration.” Ethnography 3 (4): 371–97.Google Scholar
Ward, D. A., and Breed, A. F. 1984. The United States Penitentiary, Marion, Illinois: A Report to the Judiciary Committee, United States House of Representatives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wines, E., and Dwight, T. W. 1867. Report on the Prisons and Reformatories of the United States and Canada Made to the Legislature of New York, January 1867. Albany, NY: Van Benthuysen and Sons' Steam Printing House.Google Scholar
Zimring, F. 2003. The Great American Crime Decline. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Adams v. Carlson, 352 F. Supp. 882 (E.D. Ill. 1973).Google Scholar
Ashker v. Governor. Case No. 4:09-cv-05796-CW (N.D. of Cal., Oakland Div. 2015). “Expert Report of Juan E. Méndez.”Google Scholar
Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1940).Google Scholar
Clonce v. Richardson, 379 F. Supp. 338, 345 (W.D. Mo. 1974).Google Scholar
Davis v. Ayala, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), No. 13–1428.Google Scholar
Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (1978).Google Scholar
In re Medley, 134 U.S. 160 (1890).Google Scholar
Madrid v. Gomez, 889 F. Supp. 1146 (1995).Google Scholar
McElvaine v. Brush, 142 U.S. 155 (1891).Google Scholar
Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 (1974).Google Scholar
Ruiz v. Texas, No. 16–7792 (Mar. 7, 2017) (J. Breyer, dissenting).Google Scholar
Toussaint v. McCarthy, 597 F. Supp. 1388 (N.D. Cal. 1984), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 801 F.2d 1080 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1069 (1987).Google Scholar
United States v. Moreland, 258 U.S. 433, 449 (1922) (Brandeis, J., dissenting).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Pennsylvania. 1818. “An Act to Provide for the Erection of a State Penitentiary on the Public Land Adjoining the Town of Allegheny Opposite Pittsburg, in the County of Allegheny, and for Other Purposes.” In Acts of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 138–40. Harrisburg, PA: C. Gleim.Google Scholar
Pennsylvania. 1829. “No. 204: A Further Supplement to an Act, Entitled ‘An Act to Reform the Penal Laws of this Commonwealth.’” In Laws of the General Assembly of the State of Pennsylvania, 341–54. Harrisburg, PA: Office of the Reporter.Google Scholar