Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:39:21.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Communications Revolutions and Legal Culture: An Elusive Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Richard J. Ross
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , Summer 2002 , pp. 637 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1973. A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society. Law and Society Review 8: 217–347.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflictions on the Origin and Spead of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. 1973. Solicitors and the Law of Maintenance, 1590-1640. Cambridge Law Journal 32: 56–80.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. 1986. The Inns of Court and Legal Doctrine. In Lawyers and Laymen ed. Charles-Edwards, T. M., Owen, Morfydd E., and Walters, D. B., 275–86. Cardiff: University of Wales.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1978. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakeliltes and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, Thomas P., and Pinch, Trevor J. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A., Entwisle, Barbara, and Alderson, Arthur S. 1993. Macrocomparative Research Methods. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 321–51.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. W. 1986. Pettyfoggers and Vipers of the Commonwealth: The “Lower Branch” of the Legal Profession in Early Modern England. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bulliet, Richard W. 1994. Determinism and Pre-Industrial Technology. In Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Deteminism, ed. Roe Smith, Merritt and Marx, Leo, 201–15. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L. 1996. Federalism in Cyberspace. Connecticut Law Review 28: 1095–1136.Google Scholar
Carey, James W. 1968. Harold Adam Innis and Marshall McLuhan. In Rosenthal 1968, 270–308.Google Scholar
Carey, James W. 1981. McLuhan and Mumford: The Roots of Modem Media Analysis. Journal of Communication 162–78.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. 1998. Virtual Civil Litigation: A Visit to John Bunyan's Celestial City. Columbia Law Review 98: 1516–37.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1989. The Practical Impact of Writing. In A History of Private Life. Vol. 3, Passions of the Renaissance, ed. Chartier, Roger, 111–59. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard. University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Morris R., and Nagel, Ernest. 1934. An Introduction to Logic and the Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1991. The Comparative Method: Two Decades of Change. In Comparative Political Dynamics: Global Research Perspectives, ed. Rustow, Dankwart A. and Paul Erickson, Kenneth, 7–31. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Collins, James. 1995. Literacy and Literacies. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 75–93.Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan. 1999. The Constitutionalist Revolution: The Transformation of Political Culture in Early Stuart England. Past and Present 163: 76–120.Google Scholar
Culkin, John. 1968. A Schoolman's Guide to Marshall McLuhan. In Rosenthal 1968, 242–56.Google Scholar
Davies, John. 1869–76. Preface to Irish Reports [1615]. In The Complete Works in Verse and Prose (Including Hitherto Unpublished MSS) of Sir John Davies. Printed for private circulation.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Zemon. 1975. Printing and the People. In Zemon Davis, Natalie, Society and Culture in Early Modern France: Eight Essays, 189–226. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
DeFelice, E. Gene. 1986. Causal Inference and Comparative Methods. Comparative Political Studies 19: 415–37.Google Scholar
Dellapenna, Joseph W. 2000. Law in a Shrinking World: The Interaction of Science and Technology with International Law. Kentucky Law Journal 88: 809–82.Google Scholar
De Sola Pool, Ithiel, ed. 1977. The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Sola Pool, Ithiel, ed. 1983. Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Developments in the Law: The Law of Cyberspace. 1999. Harvard Law Review 112: 1574–1704.Google Scholar
Dogan, Mattei, and Pelassy, Dominique. 1984. How to Compare Nations: Strategies in Comparative Politics. Chatham, N. J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. Glencoe, III.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fallers, Lloyd A. 1969. Law without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien, and Henri-Jean, Martin. 1997. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing, 1450–1800. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. 1988. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III. 1998. Property and Contract on the Internet. Chicago-Kent Law Review 73: 1203–56.Google Scholar
Frendeis, John P. 1983. Explanation of Variation and Detection of Covariation: The Purpose and Logic of Comparative Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 16: 255–72.Google Scholar
Furet, Francois, and Ozouf, Jacques. 1982. Reading and Writing: Literacy in France from Calvin to Jules Ferry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Patrick. 1952. The Nature of Historical Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 1990: 131–50.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1967. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter. 1990. Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1986. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian. 1968. The Consequences of Literacy. In Literacy in Traditional Societies, ed. Goody, Jack, 27–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1976. The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology: The Origins, Grammar, and Future of Ideology. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 1979. The Literacy Myth: Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth-Century American City. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 1987a. The Labyrinths of Literacy: Reflections on Literacy Past and Present. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 1987b. The Legacies of Literacy: Continuities and Contradictions in Western Culture and Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Charles. 1980. Reason, Authority, and Imagination: The Jurisprudence of Sir Edward Coke. In Culture and Politics from Puritanism to the Enlightenment, ed. Zagorin, Perez, 25–66. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Halverson, John. 1992. Goody and the Implosion of the Literacy Thesis. Man 27: 301–17.Google Scholar
Hardy, I. Trotter. 1994. The Proper Legal Regime for “Cyberspace. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 55: 993–1055.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., and Honore, Tony. 1985. Causation in the Law. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Michael. 1993. Legal Data Banks, the Glut of Lawyers, and the German Legal Profession. Law and Society Review 27: 421–43.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, Bernard J. 1992. “Coming to Our Senses”: Communication and Legal Expression in Performance Cultures. Emory Law Journal 41: 873–960.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, Bernard J. 1996. Last Writes? Reassessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace. New York University Law Review 71: 615–88.Google Scholar
Hoffman, David. 1836. A Course of Legal Study, Addressed to Students and the Profession Generally. Baltimore: Joseph Neal.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold A. 1951. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Innis, Harold A. 1972. Empire and Communications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
John, Richard R. 1996. Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David R., and Post, David. 1996. Law and Borders-the Rise of Law in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review 48: 1367–1402.Google Scholar
Judson, Margaret A. 1988. The Crisis of the Constitution: An Essay in Constitutional and Political Thought in England, 1603–1645. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kroker, Arthur. 1984. Technology and the Canadian Mind: Innis/McLuhan/Grant. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Levi, Edward H. 1949. An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1991. Small N's and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases. Social Forces 70: 307–20.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1994. More on the Uneasy Case for Using Mill-Type Methods in Small-N Comparative Studies. Social Forces 72: 1225–37.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 1997. The Big Broad Issues in Society and Social History: Application of a Probabilistic Perspective. In Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences, ed. McKim, Vaughn R. and Stephen, P. Turner, , 359–85. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Lien, Molly Warner. 1998. Technocentrism and the Soul of the Common Law Lawyer. American University Law Review 48: 85–134.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. American Political Science Review 65: 682–93.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. 1996. History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias. American Political Science Review 90: 605–18.Google Scholar
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. 1986. Suffolk and the Tudors: Politics and Religion in an English County, 1500-1600. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Wajcman, Judy, eds. 1985. The Social Shaping of Technology. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1965. Causes and Conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly 2: 245–64.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 1999. Nominal, Ordinal, and Narrative Appraisal in Macrocausal Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 104: 1154–96.Google Scholar
Mann, Bruce H. 1987. Neighbors and Strangers: Law and Community in Early Connecticut. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Markell, Bruce A. 1996. Digital Demons and Lost Lawyers. Federal Communications Law Journal 545–55.Google Scholar
Martin, Henri-Jean. 1996. The French Book: Religion, Absolutism, and Readership, 1585-1715. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Martin, Peter W. 1999. The Internet: “Full and Unfettered Access” to Law-Some Implications. Northern Kentucky Law Review 26: 181–209.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1956. A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. 1984. Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1981. The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Pantaloni, Nazareth A. M. III. 1994. Legal Databases, Legal Epistemology, and the Legal Order. Law Library Journal 86: 679–706.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Perritt, Henry H. Jr. 1996. Law and the Information Superhighway. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Perritt, Henry H. Jr. 1998. The Internet Is Changing International Law. Chicago-Kent Law Review 73: 997–1054.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1987. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prest, Wilfred R. 1986. The Rise of the Barristers: A Social History of the English Bar, 1590-1640. Oxford, England: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Raymond, ed. 1968. McLuhan: Pro and Con. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.Google Scholar
Ross, Richard J. 1998a. The Commoning of the Common Law: The Renaissance Debate over Printing English Law, 1520-1640. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146: 323–461.Google Scholar
Ross, Richard J. 1998b. The Memorial Culture of Early Modern English Lawyers: Memory as Keyword, Shelter, and Identity, 1560-1640. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 10: 229–326.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 1996. The Quest for Enabling Metaphors for Law and Lawyering in the Information Age. Michigan Law Review 94: 2029–57.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 1999. Intellectual Property and Contract Law for the Information Age. California Law Review 87: 1–16.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, and Wise, Virginia J. 1997. Legal Positivism as Legal Information. Cornell Law Review 82: 1080–1110.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, and Wise, Virginia J. 2000. Nonlegal Information and the Delegalization of Law. Journal of Legal Studies 29: 495–515.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia, and Cole, Michael. 1981. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1967. Marc Bloch and the Logic of the Comparative Method. History and Theory 6: 208–18.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Andrew L. 1999. The Control Revolution: How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know. New York: Century Foundation.Google Scholar
Sheppard, William. 1648. The Touchstone of Common Assurances. London .Google Scholar
Simpson, A. W. B. 1987. The Common Law and Legal Theory. In Simpson, A. W. B., Legal Theory and Legal History: Essays on the Common Law, 359–82. London: Hambledon.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosociological Inquiry. Comparative Studies in Sociology and History 22: 176–97.Google Scholar
Slack, Jennifer Daryl. 1984a. Communications Technologies and Society: Concepts of Causality and the Politics of Technological Intervention. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Slack, Jennifer Daryl. 1984b. Surveying the Impacts of Communication Technologies. Progress in Communication Sciences 5: 73–109.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Smith, William. 1939. Course of Study for Law Students. In Legal Education in Colonial New York, ed. Hamlin, Paul, 197–200. New York: New York University Law Quarterly Review.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P. 1986. Politics and Ideology in England, 1603-1640. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Susskind, Richard E. 1998. The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. 1986. The Meaning of Literacy in Early Modern England. In The Written Word: Literacy in Transition, ed. Baumann, Gerd, 97–131. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1972. Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism. Wisconsin Law Review 1972: 720–53.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1995a. Cheap Speech and What It Will Do. Yale Law Journal 104: 1805–50.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1995b. Technology and the Future of Law. Stanford Law Review 47: 1375–1403.Google Scholar
Volokh, Eugene. 1996. Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace from the Listener's Perspective: Private Speech Restrictions, Libel, State Actions, Harassment, and Sex. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1996: 377–436.Google Scholar
Waldstreicher, David. 1997. In the Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making of American Nationalism, 1776-1820. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Walsham, Alexandra. 2000. “Domme Preachers”? Post Reformation English Catholicism and the Culture of Print. Past and Present 168: 73–123.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael. 1990. The Letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere in Eighteenth Century America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1967. Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1989. Law without Lawbooks. New York Times 20 August, sec. 7, p. 23.Google Scholar
Wilson, James. 1896. The Works of James Wilson: Being His Public Discourses upon Jurisprudence and Political Science, Including Lectures as Professor of Law, 1790–2. Chicago: Callaghan.Google Scholar
Winston, Brian. 1998. Media, Technology and Society: A History, from the Telegraph to the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zaret, David. 2000. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions and the Public Sphere in Early Modern England. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar