Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:41:18.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing Hazily (But Not Darkly) Through the Lens: Some Recent Empirical Studies of Surveillance Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Gary T. Marx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Spring 2005 , pp. 339 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. 2003. Accountability for Private Life. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. 2002. Creating Fear: News and the Construction of Crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Altman, I. 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
American Management Association. 1999. U.S. Corporations Reduce Levels of Medical, Drug, and Psychological Testing of Employees. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Ball, K., and Webster, F., eds. 2003. The Intensification of Surveillance: Crime, Terrorism, and Warfare in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. 196667. Whose Side Are We On Social Problems 14: 239–47.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Privacy in the United States and Europe. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C, and Raab, C. 2003. The Governance of Privacy. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bloustein, E. J. 1979. Individual and Group Privacy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. 1957. Collective Behavior. In Review of Sociology: Analysis of the Decade, ed. Gittler, J. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bogard, B. 1996. The Simulation of Surveillance: Hyper Control in Telematic Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1978. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Bok, S. 1982. Secrets on the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Boyne, R. 2000. Post-panopttcism Economy and Society 29: 285–307.Google Scholar
Brin, D. 1998. The Transparent Society. Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Burnham, D. 1983. The Rise of the Computer State. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Cate, F. 2004. Safeguarding Privacy in the Fight Against Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
Chan, J. 2003. Police and New Technologies. In Handbook of Policing, ed. Newburn, T. Cullompton, Devon, U.K.: Willan.Google Scholar
Chan, J. et al. 2001. E-Po!icing.’ The Impact of Information Technology on Police Practices. Queensland, Australia: Criminal Justice Commission.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1985. Visions of Social Control. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2001. Suspect Identities: A History of Criminal Identification and Fingerprinting. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, R., and Marx, G. 1991. No Soul in the New Machine: Techno-Fallacies in the Electronic Monitoring Movement. Justice Quarterly 8: 399–416.Google Scholar
Coser, R. 1961. Insulation from Observability and Types of Social Conformity. American Sociological Review 26: 28–39.Google Scholar
Curry, M. 1997. Digital Places: Living With Geographic Information Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dash, S., Schwartz, R., and Knowlton, R. 1959. The Eavesdroppers. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future of Los Angeles. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Deflem, M. 2002. Policing World Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guttari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
De Lint, W. 2000. Arresting the Eye: Surveillance, Social Control, and Resistance. Assemblages: Space and Culture 7: 21–49.Google Scholar
Doyle, A. 2003. Arresting Images. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, R., and Haggerty, K. 1997. Policing the Risk Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1999. The Limits of Privacy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ewick, P., and Silbey, S. 1998. The Commonplace Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Finkin, M. 2002. Mensclienbild: The Conception of the Employee As a Person In Western Law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 23: 577–637.Google Scholar
Fogelson, R. 1977. Big City Police. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1949. Collected Papers. Vol. 2. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Fried, C. 1968. Privacy. Yale Law Journal. 77: 475–93.Google Scholar
Froomkin, M. 2000. The Death of Privacy Stanford Law Review 52: 1461–543.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Y. 2004. The Glass Cage. In Self, Social Structure, and Beliefs, ed. Alexander, J., Marx, G., and Williams, C. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gandy, O. 1993. The Panoptic Sort. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.Google Scholar
Garfinkle, S. 2000. Database Nation. Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly.Google Scholar
Garland, D. 1997. Governmentality and the Problem of Crime: Foucault, Criminology, Sociology. Theoretical Criminology 1: 173–214.Google Scholar
Gavison, R. 1980. Privacy and the Limits of Law. Yale Law Journal 89: 421–71.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.Google Scholar
Gilliom, J. 1994. Surveillance, Privacy, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays in the Social Situation of the Mental Patient and Other Inmates. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor.Google Scholar
Groombridge, N. 2002. Crime Control or Crime Culture TV Surveillance and Society 1: 30–46.Google Scholar
Gutwirth, S. 2002. Privacy and the Information Age. Boston: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K., and Ericson, R., 2000. The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 5: 605–22.Google Scholar
Handler, J. 1992. Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements. Law and Society Review 26: 697–732.Google Scholar
Helten, F., and Fischer, B. 2003. Video Surveillance on Demand for Various Purposes? Berlin: Berlin Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Hillyard, D., ed. 2004. Special issue, Knowledge, Technology and Policy 17.Google Scholar
Hillyard, D., and Knight, S. 2004. Privacy, Technology, and Social Change. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy 17: 80–101.Google Scholar
Huxley, A. 2000. Brave New World Revisited. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
Ingram, R. 1978. Privacy and Psychology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Jermier, J. 1998. Critical Perspectives on Organizational Control. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 235–510.Google Scholar
Laudon, K. 1986. Dossier Society Value Choices in the Design of National Information Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, S. 1993. It Could Happen Here. New York: Signet Classics.Google Scholar
Leman-Langlois, S. 2002. The Myopic Panopticon: The Social Consequences of Policing Through the Lens. Policing and Society 13: 43–58.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. 2003. Surveillance after September 11th. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity.Google Scholar
Mack, A. 2001. Privacy. Social Research 68: 1–333.Google Scholar
Mann, S., Nolan, J., and Wellman, B. 2003. Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. Surveillance and Society 1: 331–55.Google Scholar
Manning, P. K. 1992. Technology and Organizational Changes in Policing. In Endemic Issues in Policing, ed. Hoover, L., 251–80. Washington, D.C.: PERF.Google Scholar
Margulis, S. 1977. Conceptions of Privacy: Current Status and Next Steps. Journal of Social Issues 3: 5–21.Google Scholar
Margulis, S. 2003. Privacy as a Social Issue and Behavioral Concept. Journal of Social Issues 51: 243–62.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1987. Raising Your Hand Won't Do. Los Angeles Times, April 1.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1988. Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1989. DNA “Fingerprints” May One Day Be Our National ID Card. Wall Street Journal, April 20.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1990. The Case of the Omniscient Organization. Harvard Business Review, March-April.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1995. Undercover in Comparative Perspective: Some Implications for Knowledge and Social Research. In Undercover: Police Surveillance in Comparative Per spective , ed. Fijnaut, C. and Marx, G. Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1996. Electric Eye in the Sky: Some Reflections on the New Surveillance in Popular Culture. Jn Computers, Surveillance, and Privacy, ed. Lyon, D. and Zureik, E. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 1998. An Ethics for the New Surveillance. Information Society 14: 171–85.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 2001. Murky Conceptual Waters: The Public and the Private. Ethics and Information Technology 3: 157–69.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 2002a. Technology and Gender: Thomas I. Voire and the Case of the Peeping Tom. Sociological Quarterly 43: 407–33.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 2002b. What's New About the New Surveillance? Classifying for Change and Continuity. Surveillance and Society 1: 9–29.Google Scholar
Marx, G. 2003. A Tack in the Shoe: Neutralizing and Resisting the New Surveillance. Journal of Social Issues 59: 369–90.Google Scholar
Marx, Forthcoming G. Varieties of Personal Information as Influences on Attitudes Toward Surveillance.Google Scholar
Mathiesen, T. 1997. The Viewer Society: Michael Foucault's “Panopticon” Revisited Theoretical Criminology 1: 215–34.Google Scholar
McCann, M., and March, T. 1995. Law and Everyday Forms of Resistance. In Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, ed. Sarat, A. and Silbey, S. Vol. 15. Greenwich, Conn.: JA1 Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, W. 1997. Crime and Law Enforcement in the Global Village. Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. 2003. Loving Big Brother. Oxford, U.K.: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meehan, A. J. 1998. The Impact of Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) Information Technology on Police Subculture Through the Introduction of Information Technology. Qualitative Sociology 21: 225–54.Google Scholar
Merton, R. 1959. Control, Deviation, and Opportunity Structures. American Sociological Review 24: 177–88.Google Scholar
Miller, A. 1971. The Assault on Privacy: Computers, Data Banks, and Dossiers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1967. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monmonier, M. 2002. Spying With Maps. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D., and Haggerty, K. 2001. Bring it on Home: Home Drug Testing and the Relocation of the War on Drugs. Social and Legal Studies 10: 378–95.Google Scholar
Murray, H. 2000. Deniable Degradation: The Finger-Imaging of Welfare Recipients. Sociological Forum 15: 39–63.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences Forthcoming. Privacy in the Information Age. Nelkin, D., and L. Andrews. 2001. Body Bazaar. New York: Crown Books.Google Scholar
Nelkin, D., and Tancredi, L. 1994. The Social Power of Biological Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Newburn, T., Shiner, M., and Hayman, S. 2004. Race, Crime, and Injustice? Strip Search and the Treatment of Suspects in Custody. British Journal of Criminology 44: 677–94.Google Scholar
Nippert-Eng, C. 1995. Home and Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. 1998. Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public. Law and Philosophy 17: 559–96.Google Scholar
Norris, C, and Armstrong, G. 1999. The Maximum Surveillance Society. Oxford, U.K.: Berg.Google Scholar
Norris, C, Moran, J., and Armstrong, G. 1998. Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television, and Social Control. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Parenti, C. 2003. The Soft Cage. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Poster, M. 1990. The Mode of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Regan, P. 1995. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Roth, P. 2004. The Plot Against America. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Rule, J. 1974. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Rule, J. 1983. 1984-The Ingredients of Totalitarianism. In 1984 Revisited, ed. Howe, I. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Ryan, P., and Shamberg, M. 1971. Guerilla Television. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Scher, J. 2004. http://www.insecuritybyjulia.com.thing.net/pictures.htm.Google Scholar
Schoenman, F., ed. 1984. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shearing, C, and Stenning, P. 1987. Private Policing. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Sheptycki, J. 2003. In Search of Transnational Policing: Towards a Sociology of Global Policing. Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Slobogin, C. 2002. Public Privacy: Camera Surveillance of Public Places and the Right to Anonymity. Mississippi Law Journal 72: 213–98.Google Scholar
Smith, H. J. 1994. Managing Privacy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Smith, H. J. 1999. Ben Franklin's Web Site. Providence, R.I.: Sheridan Pres.Google Scholar
Solove, D. 2002. Conceptualizing Privacy. California Law Review 90: 1087–156.Google Scholar
Staples, W. 2000. Everyday Surveillance: Vigilance and Visibility in Postmodern Life. Lanham, Md.: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sullivan, T. P. 2004. Police Experience with Recording Custodial Interrogations. Evanston, III: Center for Wrongful Conviction, Northwestern Law School.Google Scholar
Sykes, C. 1999. The End of Privacy. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Van Harten, D., and Van Est, R. 2003. Special Issue: Privacy in an Information Society. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 11: 1–36.Google Scholar
Welsh, B., and Farrington, D. 2004. Surveillance for Crime Prevention in Public Space: Results and Policy Choices in Britain and America 3: 497–526.Google Scholar
Westin, A. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 1969. On Record: Files and Dossiers in American Life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Wood, D. 2003. Editorial: Foucault and Panopticism Revisited. Surveillance and Society, vol. 1, no. 3. http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/journalvli3.htm.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. 1996. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zureik, E. 2003. Theorizing Surveillance: The Case of the Workplace. In Surveillance as Social Sorting, ed Lyon, D. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar